Page 269 of 329

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2016 6:40 pm
by tigerpranke
-flop- wrote:Here is something wrong, too: no first appearance date, no last note entered... :roll:
Tresana should be ok now.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:48 am
by -flop-
tigerpranke wrote:
-flop- wrote:Here is something wrong, too: no first appearance date, no last note entered... :roll:
Tresana should be ok now.
Great job!
Thank you. :mrgreen:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2016 2:17 pm
by Fons
I guess some cities in this region should be merged.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... egion=2039

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:32 pm
by googlejaps
Fons wrote:I guess some cities in this region should be merged.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... egion=2039
Fixed :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:09 pm
by negative

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 9:40 am
by googlejaps

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:54 am
by Infrarouge
Missing dot:

Vrisia

https://www.google.de/maps/place/Vrisia ... 28.1928747

Thanks for amending!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2016 11:02 am
by googlejaps
Infrarouge wrote:Missing dot:

Vrisia

https://www.google.de/maps/place/Vrisia ... 28.1928747

Thanks for amending!
done :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:27 am
by negative

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:45 am
by Raumi
Done!
Thank you for spotting!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:07 am
by negative
city Riga is in :flag-lv: not :flag-lt:
RIGA LT.JPG
RIGA LT.JPG (27.32 KiB) Viewed 1092 times
http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=168820061
NASE RIGA LT.JPG
NASE RIGA LT.JPG (24.8 KiB) Viewed 1092 times

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 2:08 pm
by flv-fgsp
I entered some notes from Hosingen (Luxemburg, 9801), but till now, the right dot hasn't be attributed.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=162954866

Should I have entered Parc Hosingen, which is the name of the Commune/Gemeinde?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 2:09 pm
by negative
Helsinki is in :flag-fi: Finland not :flag-se: Sweden
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=168836167
Helsinki SE.JPG
Helsinki SE.JPG (21.23 KiB) Viewed 1075 times

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:50 pm
by tigerpranke
flv-fgsp wrote:I entered some notes from Hosingen (Luxemburg, 9801), but till now, the right dot hasn't be attributed.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=162954866

Should I have entered Parc Hosingen, which is the name of the Commune/Gemeinde?
The coordinates of 9801 Hosingen were wrong. Your dot should appear within a few hours now.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 6:53 pm
by tigerpranke
negative wrote:city Riga is in :flag-lv: not :flag-lt:
...
Helsinki is in :flag-fi: Finland not :flag-se: Sweden
Well, it were the trackers who chose the wrong country. :roll: And only those trackers can change it.

In the meantime the cities have been assigned to the right profile.