Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Phaseolus, Fons, avij, dserrano5

User avatar
eddydevries
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18645
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Den Haag (NL)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby eddydevries » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:02 pm

Burdie wrote:
groentje wrote:According to PostNL, there is a space between the numbers and the letters of the postal code, and two between the postal code and the city name.
A link: https://www.postnl.nl/en/mail-and-parce ... il-banner-



As Dutch City manager, I give all the new postcodes from The Netherlands a dot based on combination Postcode / Place given in Google map.
for Breskens (4511 RE) should that give coordinates 51.40427, 3.54284
In this case someone entered already a note in 26-9-2006 withe Breskens (4511 RE) But it is fixed by Inviterbo :-)

I've seen entering notes both with and without space in the postcode.
Officially it's with the space, but I've seen lot of dot where both postcodes are plotted :wink: .
Eddy - Den Haag - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1590 +56 triples +1 quadruple = 1647.

Facebook-profile + hyves-profile + postcrossing

scrtr
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:56 am
Location: Brugge, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby scrtr » Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:32 am

The city 'Blankebergen' is misspelled, as it should be 'Blankenberge'.

User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby tigerpranke » Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:46 pm

scrtr wrote:The city 'Blankebergen' is misspelled, as it should be 'Blankenberge'.

Done.

siriusLT
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby siriusLT » Mon May 01, 2017 2:23 pm

Please add coordinates for :flag-lt: Taujėnai:

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=229392
Taujėnai 55°23′31″N 24°45′50″E
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tauj%C4%97nai

User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby Burdie » Mon May 01, 2017 11:13 pm

siriusLT wrote:Please add coordinates for :flag-lt: Taujėnai:

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=229392
Taujėnai 55°23′31″N 24°45′50″E
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tauj%C4%97nai


Coordinates are already in. Please give us et least 48 hours the time to sort things out, as stated on the first post of this topic
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST 244 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 367
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog

User avatar
negative
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:53 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby negative » Sun May 14, 2017 8:14 am

Missing DOT for:
:flag-de: Mülheim an der Ruhr
51.415804, 6.907388
http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=175793352

User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby tigerpranke » Sun May 14, 2017 8:56 am

negative wrote:Missing DOT for:
:flag-de: Mülheim an der Ruhr
51.415804, 6.907388
http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=175793352

:?: Nothing wrong with :flag-de: 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr since 2006

User avatar
negative
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 2:53 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby negative » Sun May 14, 2017 7:13 pm

tigerpranke wrote:
negative wrote:Missing DOT for:
:flag-de: Mülheim an der Ruhr
51.415804, 6.907388
http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=175793352

:?: Nothing wrong with :flag-de: 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr since 2006


Can I get a DOT?
Mulheim.PNG
Mulheim.PNG (297.94 KiB) Viewed 172 times

User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1543
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby tigerpranke » Sun May 14, 2017 7:46 pm

You can't get this dot with postal code 45470, as it is located just east of the dot-border. 45468 will give you the dot.

scrtr
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:56 am
Location: Brugge, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby scrtr » Tue May 16, 2017 9:42 pm

:flag-be: Zwevezele

The location of this place on the map seems to be wrong.
I had a hit there with Wingene, which is only 4 km away from Zwevezele.

User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby Burdie » Wed May 17, 2017 4:56 pm

scrtr wrote::flag-be: Zwevezele

The location of this place on the map seems to be wrong.
I had a hit there with Wingene, which is only 4 km away from Zwevezele.



I hope it is better now (5 km) The dot from Zwevezele was placed in Zwevegem (Kortrijk)
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST 244 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 367
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog

scrtr
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:56 am
Location: Brugge, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Postby scrtr » Wed May 17, 2017 7:06 pm

Burdie wrote:
scrtr wrote::flag-be: Zwevezele

The location of this place on the map seems to be wrong.
I had a hit there with Wingene, which is only 4 km away from Zwevezele.



I hope it is better now (5 km) The dot from Zwevezele was placed in Zwevegem (Kortrijk)


Much better, thanks! :)


Return to “Feedback and Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest