Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: avij, Phaseolus, Fons, dserrano5

User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4184
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

I have spotted some missing dots in my dotmap:

:flag-fr: Lieu-dit Les Roches has coordinates 45.116, 6.086 (it is part of the municipality of Huez, but it is in another dot).
:flag-fr: Les Quintrands has coordinates 43.852, 5.818 (it is part of the municipality of Manosque, but it is in another dot).
:flag-es: Barakaldo has coordinates 43.289, -3.011.
:flag-es: Piedras Blancas has coordinates 43.561, -5.977.
This :flag-es: Salcedo is in Asturias and not in Ponevedra. The coordinates are 43.531, -6.697.
:flag-pt: Avelar with post code 3240-302 has coordinates 39.918, -8.360. (IMHO, in Portugal, every post sode should have its own coordinates, I am not sure if the Portuguese do this?)
:flag-es: Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo is divided into two dots. I have enterd them in Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo-Este and Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo-Oeste. They have all been placed in the eastern dot. The western dot has coordinates 38.301, -5.272.
:flag-es: Puente de la Cerrada has coordinates 37.958, -3.189.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 6529
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

Elmo wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:05 pm:flag-pt: Avelar[/url] with post code 3240-302 has coordinates 39.918, -8.360. (IMHO, in Portugal, every post sode should have its own coordinates, I am not sure if the Portuguese do this?)
We do. 😎

Please change your postal code to the correct one:

3240-316

This one has coordinates already. I may have to set them again after you change the postal code though, because locations with zero notes are automatically deleted after a very short period of time.

I know you saw your postal code somewhere but unfortunately it's not uncommon for companies to show their own postal codes wrong, not for Google to show the wrong postal codes for companies. 3240-302 does not exist in fact.

Cheers!
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Elmo, I think Spain is now OK for you. I changed Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo-Oeste and Salcedo. The other places were already dotted
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4184
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

lmviterbo wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:57 am
Elmo wrote: Fri Mar 25, 2022 9:05 pm:flag-pt: Avelar[/url] with post code 3240-302 has coordinates 39.918, -8.360. (IMHO, in Portugal, every post sode should have its own coordinates, I am not sure if the Portuguese do this?)
We do. 😎

Please change your postal code to the correct one:

3240-316

This one has coordinates already. I may have to set them again after you change the postal code though, because locations with zero notes are automatically deleted after a very short period of time.

I know you saw your postal code somewhere but unfortunately it's not uncommon for companies to show their own postal codes wrong, not for Google to show the wrong postal codes for companies. 3240-302 does not exist in fact.

Cheers!
Tkanks for your advice! I have changed the post code. The dot is correct now. :)
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4184
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

Burdie wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 11:17 am Elmo, I think Spain is now OK for you. I changed Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo-Oeste and Salcedo. The other places were already dotted
Thanks for your effort, Burdie! Unfortunately the other dots are still wrong. They are dotted, but they are dotted in the wrong dot. And the same is true for the two French dots.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Elmo wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 2:25 pm
Burdie wrote: Sat Mar 26, 2022 11:17 am Elmo, I think Spain is now OK for you. I changed Peñarroya-Pueblonuevo-Oeste and Salcedo. The other places were already dotted
Thanks for your effort, Burdie! Unfortunately the other dots are still wrong. They are dotted, but they are dotted in the wrong dot. And the same is true for the two French dots.
I can't see where a dot begins or ends, But if I compare for example the Piedras Blancas dot are:
EBT - Google map is 209 meter diverend
EBT - Wikipedia is 137 meter diverend
EBT - your coordinates is 264 meter divered

So I leave it where it is
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
siriusLT
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by siriusLT »

Missing dots:

:flag-lt: Molainiai - Lithuania, Panevėžys county. 55,70841, 24,31351
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=218567593
User avatar
gergapsek
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:45 am
Location: Štajerska ~ Steiermark
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by gergapsek »

Done.
siriusLT wrote: Fri Apr 08, 2022 6:24 pm Missing dots:

:flag-lt: Molainiai - Lithuania, Panevėžys county. 55,70841, 24,31351
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=218567593
User avatar
maarsy
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4270
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: merchtem

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by maarsy »

this one is from a while ago , had noticed it but never got around to request a fix

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=154950976

the location is upminster , however if you follow the link of the location it goes to london ( london city rather than greater london )


upminster should be a part of romford under this location as it falls under the RM post code rather than the central london ones https://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=222873
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

maarsy wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 7:47 pm this one is from a while ago , had noticed it but never got around to request a fix

https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=154950976

the location is upminster , however if you follow the link of the location it goes to london ( london city rather than greater london )


upminster should be a part of romford under this location as it falls under the RM post code rather than the central london ones https://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=222873
Upminster has now his own Cityprofile
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
ErGo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5956
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:12 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by ErGo »

Please support coordinates to :flag-hu: Királyszentistván:
47.1092, 18.04386
User avatar
gergapsek
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 1675
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:45 am
Location: Štajerska ~ Steiermark
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by gergapsek »

Done.
ErGo wrote: Tue Apr 26, 2022 7:57 am Please support coordinates to :flag-hu: Királyszentistván:
47.1092, 18.04386
Xerxes84
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:27 pm

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Xerxes84 »

Is is possible to get a dot added for Gortnahoe, Co. Tipperary in Ireland? No notes were entered there previously.

Gortnahoe: 52.6757° N, 7.6028° W

Link to note: https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=219362735

Thanks
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Xerxes84 wrote: Sun May 01, 2022 8:53 pm Is is possible to get a dot added for Gortnahoe, Co. Tipperary in Ireland? No notes were entered there previously.

Gortnahoe: 52.6757° N, 7.6028° W

Link to note: https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=219362735

Thanks
Done
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
-flop-
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 6617
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:39 pm
Location: Piemonte

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by -flop- »

The profile of Sarral should be split so that the italian village could be correctly located in Aosta province (45.6634, 7.1608).
Thank you.
Se tu passi un posto strano che si chiama Baffalù
io non ci sarò ma tu vedrai...


Elenco dei comuni italiani con il loro inauguratore/List of italian cities with their "first-note user"
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”