Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: avij, Phaseolus, Fons, dserrano5

opalon
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1786
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 9:00 am
Location: Belgique

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by opalon »

hello,

Is it possible to merge this city and this city in this red point :
International Airport of Tunis-Carthage
Adresse : 1080 Tunis Cedex، Tunis, Tunisie
siriusLT
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by siriusLT »

Missing dot:

Tauragnai Utena County, Lithuania. 55.449773, 25.798160
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

opalon wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:29 am ...Is it possible to merge...
Yes, both profiles are merged now.
siriusLT wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:55 pm Missing dot:

Tauragnai Utena County, Lithuania. 55.449773, 25.798160
Done.
User avatar
Dioniz
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 797
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Dioniz »

I went through :flag-hr: Croatian city profiles and found some deviations. I would have made changes by myself if I would be able to. There is a list:

Dubrovačko-neretvanska županija
Zavalatica (ID 131198) is part of a settlement Čara (no profile yet), mun. Korčula.
Lastovo (ID 157934) has to be split: Ubli (ZIP 20290) is an independent settlement (same mun. Lastovo).
Konavle (ID 204114), mun. Konavle is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Trsteno (ID 174238) belongs to mun. Dubrovnik (not mun. Dubrovačko primorje).
Duvrocnic (ID 215158) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).
Duprownick (ID 240566) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).

Istarska županija
Buje / Buie (ID 121607), mun. Buje: Kastel (ZIP 52460) belongs to (i.e. should be interchanged with) Kaštel (ID 212278), same mun. Buje.
Špina (ID 132969), mun. Umag is part of a settlement Đuba (no profile yet), same mun. Umag.
Brestova (ID 212227), mun. Kršan is part of a settlement Zagorje (no profile yet), same mun. Kršan.
Banjole (ID 154692) and Premantura (ID 135652) belong to mun. Medulin (not mun. Pula).
Štinjan (ID 236869), mun. Pula is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Pula / Pola (ID 77116), same mun. Pula.
Valbaldon (ID 236870), mun. Fažana is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Fažana (ID 156768), same mun. Fažana.
Barbariga (ID 179239), mun. Vodnjan is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Peroj (ID 236871), same mun. Vodnjan.
Kaštelir-Labinci (ID 187408) is not a settlement. It's a municipality.
Červar Porat (ID 195275) has a dash in the name (--> Červar-Porat).
Rovinji (ID 222949) = Rovinj / Rovigno (ID 82171).

Zadarska županija
Vlašići (ID 132292) belongs to mun. Pag (not mun. Povljana).
Jasenice (ID 189323) belongs to mun. Jasenice (not mun. Obrovac).
Lun (ID 213535) belongs to mun. Novalja, Ličko-senjska (not mun Pag, Zadarska).
Vrgada (ID 223675) belongs to mun. Pakoštane (not mun. Biograd na Moru).
Borik (ID 190475), mun. Zadar is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Zadar (ID 116520), same mun. Zadar.
Luka (ZIP 53282) and Luka (ZIP 23281) inside of :flag-sk: Lúka (ID 151883) belong to Luka (no profile yet), mun. Sali, Zadarska.

Ličko-senjska županija
Žigljen (ID 188594), mun. Novalja is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Novalja (ID 146688), same mun. Novalja.
Janjče (ID 190476), mun. Otočac (and probabily Janjce (ZIP 2****) (--> toll station!) inside of Kosa Janjačka (ID 190957), mun. Perušič) are part of a settlement Ramljani (no pofile yet), mun. Otočac.
Tovarnele (ID 231775), mun. Novalja is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Lun (ID 213535), same mun. Novalja.

Karlovačka županija
Ozalj (ID 226471) belongs to mun. Ozalj (not mun. Karlovac).

Splitsko-dalmatinska županija
Kaštela (ID 45405) are not a settlement, only a municipality.
Selca (ID 91157), mun. Selca: Selce (ZIP 51266) belongs to Selce (no profile yet), mun. Crikvenica, Pimorsko-goranska. (Also Selce (ZIP 752) inside of the same profile doesn't belong here, but because ZIP code is corrupted, it's hard to locate this place --> There are more places with te same name.)
Brač (ID 195755) is not a settlement nor municipality, only island.
Split Airport (ID 222422) should be integrated with original name (--> Zračna luka Split / Split Airport).

Krapinsko-zagorska županija
Macelj (ID 221655), mun. Đurmanec is not s settlement. Most probabily should be merged with Gornji Macelj (ID 32547) (--> toll station), same mun. Đurmanec.

Primorsko-goranska županija
Kikovica (ID 174964), mun. Čavle is part of a settlement Soboli (no profile yet), same mun. Čavle.
Valbiska (ID 223020), mun. Krk is part of a settlement Pinezići (no profile yet), same mun. Krk.
Martinšćica (ID 59097) belongs to mun. Cres (not mun. Kostrena).
Kostrena (ID 192775), mun. Kostrena is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Kamo Škrila (ID 197524), mun. Punat should be merged with Stara Baška (ID 197395), same mun. Punat.
Supertarska Draga (ID 220692), mun. Rab has to be renamed (--> Supetarska Draga).

Zagrebačka županija
Rugvica (ID 146864), Donja Greda (ID 210566) and Sop (ID 179720) belong to mun. Rugvica (not mun. Dugo Selo or mun. Ivanić-Grad).

Osječko-baranjska županija
Djakovo (ID 225505) has to be renamed (--> Đakovo).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x :flag-si:, 277x :flag-at:, 52x :flag-de:, 24x :flag-it:, 10x :flag-nl:, 7x :flag-be:, 5x :flag-fi:, 5x :flag-sk:, 3x :flag-fr:, 1x :flag-ee:, 1x :flag-gr:, 1x :flag-hr:, 1x :flag-lt:, 1x :flag-pt:, 1x :flag-es:, 1x ME, 1x :flag-at: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-be:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-fr: :flag-de:
Flightdiary & Where's George?
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4184
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

This Haaren is not in the Netherlands, but in Germany. The coordinates are 51.565°N, 8.727°E.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Elmo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:46 pm This Haaren is not in the Netherlands, but in Germany. The coordinates are 51.565°N, 8.727°E.
Corrected and placed in municipality Bad Wünnenberg
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4184
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

Burdie wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 12:35 am
Elmo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:46 pm This Haaren is not in the Netherlands, but in Germany. The coordinates are 51.565°N, 8.727°E.
Corrected and placed in municipality Bad Wünnenberg
Thanks! Ald would you be so kind to add Oberelsungen (Gemeinde Zierenberg) as well? The coordinates are 51.375°N, 9.229°E.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Elmo wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:21 pm
Burdie wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 12:35 am
Elmo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:46 pm This Haaren is not in the Netherlands, but in Germany. The coordinates are 51.565°N, 8.727°E.
Corrected and placed in municipality Bad Wünnenberg
Thanks! Ald would you be so kind to add Oberelsungen (Gemeinde Zierenberg) as well? The coordinates are 51.375°N, 9.229°E.
Done.
User avatar
tigerpranke
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1832
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Dingolfing, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by tigerpranke »

Please do the plotters a little favour:

Give them some time to do their job - at least 48 hours. Normally most of the :flag-eu: places get their coordinates within one week, but nobody is perfect. Not every country is monitored by a plotter, so we are thankful for your requests.

BTW: It's totally understandable that you want to see new dots on your map as soon as possible - so do I :wink:
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Dioniz wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:54 am I went through :flag-hr: Croatian city profiles and found some deviations.
I worked out the list, some profiles i didn't changed.

Brestova; Wikipedia says it is a village
Valbaldon Wikipedia says Valbandon is a village
Žigljen; wikipedia says it is a port-village
Janjče; google map says Janjče, 53202, Kosa Janjačka, Croatia and nearby petrol station CRODUX - Janjče zapad 53202, Perušić,
Macelj: Wikipedia says it is a village divided into Gornji Macelj (Upper) and Donji Macelj (Lower)
Valbiska: wikipedia says it is a village

Thank you for the list. can you check it again, if you have other info please let me know and than I can change it
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Dioniz
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 797
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Dioniz »

Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am I worked out the list.
Thank you for that!
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am can you check it again, if you have other info please let me know and than I can change it
Dubrovačko-neretvanska županija
Čara (ID 131198) belongs to mun. Korčula (not Smokvica).

Istarska županija
Kaštel (ID 212278) = Kaštel (ID 241770)

Brestova (ID 212227), mun. Kršan is part of a settlement Zagorje (no profile yet), same mun. Kršan.
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 amBrestova; Wikipedia says it is a village
That's not correct. Here's a list of settlements in mun. Kršan (not avaliable in English): https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kr%C5%A1an. You can check the extent of Zagorje also on Google Maps: https://www.google.si/maps/place/52234, ... 6898?hl=sl
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am Wikipedia says Valbandon is a village
You're right (--> since 2011). In Google Maps they are not separated yet.

Ličko-senjska županija
Žigljen (ID 188594), mun. Novalja is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Novalja (ID 146688), same mun. Novalja.
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 amŽigljen; wikipedia says it is a port-village
It's a port but not independent settlement. Here's a list of these in mun. Novalja: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novalja. Same on Google Maps.

Janjče (ID 190476), mun. Otočac (and probabily Janjce (ZIP 2****) (--> toll station!) inside of Kosa Janjačka (ID 190957), mun. Perušič) are part of a settlement Ramljani (no pofile yet), mun. Otočac.
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am Janjče; google map says Janjče, 53202, Kosa Janjačka, Croatia and nearby petrol station CRODUX - Janjče zapad 53202, Perušić,
These are just ZIP codes. The settlement is Ramljani: https://www.google.si/maps/place/53224, ... 0986?hl=sl. Here's a list of settlements in mun. Otočac (on the bottom): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oto%C4%8Dac

Krapinsko-zagorska županija
Macelj (ID 221655), mun. Đurmanec is not s settlement. Most probabily should be merged with Gornji Macelj (ID 32547) (--> toll station), same mun. Đurmanec.
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am Macelj: Wikipedia says it is a village divided into Gornji Macelj (Upper) and Donji Macelj (Lower)
I know. I just wanted to say it needs to be merged with one of these two and the first has a toll station, so it has to be the right one.

Primorsko-goranska županija
Valbiska (ID 223020), mun. Krk is part of a settlement Pinezići (no profile yet), same mun. Krk.
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am Valbiska: wikipedia says it is a village
It's only a small port. Here's a list of villages that belong to Krk (in the middle): https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krk_(grad). Google Maps (Valbiska on the south): https://www.google.si/maps/place/Pinezi ... 8276?hl=sl

Kostrena (ZIP 51221) inside of Randići (ID 192775), mun. Kostrena. --> Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put it under Kostrena Sveta Lucija which is the seat of mun.

Zagrebačka županija
Sop (ID 179720) belongs to mun. Rugvica (not mun. Ivanić-Grad).

You made a mistake with Trsteno (ID 174238). It belongs to mun. Dubrovnik (not mun. Dubrava, Zagrebačka).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x :flag-si:, 277x :flag-at:, 52x :flag-de:, 24x :flag-it:, 10x :flag-nl:, 7x :flag-be:, 5x :flag-fi:, 5x :flag-sk:, 3x :flag-fr:, 1x :flag-ee:, 1x :flag-gr:, 1x :flag-hr:, 1x :flag-lt:, 1x :flag-pt:, 1x :flag-es:, 1x ME, 1x :flag-at: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-be:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-fr: :flag-de:
Flightdiary & Where's George?
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

Dioniz wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:57 pm
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am I worked out the list.
Thank you for that!
Burdie wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:42 am can you check it again, if you have other info please let me know and than I can change it

I think we are there now
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
User avatar
Dioniz
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 797
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:07 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Dioniz »

Burdie wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:51 amI think we are there now
Thank you for your effort!

It's only one small thing left. There's been a missunderstanding regarding Macelj, mun. Đurmanec, Krapinsko-zagorska županija. There are two separate settlements: Gornji Macelj and Donji Macelj. Now there's only one (Macelj) which has to be split and "Macelj" (without adjective) belongs to Gornji Macelj (--> toll station).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x :flag-si:, 277x :flag-at:, 52x :flag-de:, 24x :flag-it:, 10x :flag-nl:, 7x :flag-be:, 5x :flag-fi:, 5x :flag-sk:, 3x :flag-fr:, 1x :flag-ee:, 1x :flag-gr:, 1x :flag-hr:, 1x :flag-lt:, 1x :flag-pt:, 1x :flag-es:, 1x ME, 1x :flag-at: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-be:, 1x :flag-be: :flag-at:, 1x :flag-fr: :flag-de:
Flightdiary & Where's George?
User avatar
eddydevries
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20029
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Rotterdam (NL)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by eddydevries »

One user enter his notes from Zwankendamme as "Zwankandamme" (last link is of his note)

Please add the coordinates like this note.
If it's not possible to copy the coordinates from another note (I think it's better to have the least different coordinates for the same city-postcode-combination), you can use N 51.309938, E 3.196636.

And than merge this city profile into Zwankendamme.
Eddy - Rotterdam - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.

Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
User avatar
Burdie
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Burdie »

eddydevries wrote: Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:32 pm merge this city profile into Zwankendamme.
Done
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple :flag-ie: 3 :flag-eu: 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”