Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Moderators: avij, Phaseolus, Fons, dserrano5
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I went through Croatian city profiles and found some deviations. I would have made changes by myself if I would be able to. There is a list:
Dubrovačko-neretvanska županija
Zavalatica (ID 131198) is part of a settlement Čara (no profile yet), mun. Korčula.
Lastovo (ID 157934) has to be split: Ubli (ZIP 20290) is an independent settlement (same mun. Lastovo).
Konavle (ID 204114), mun. Konavle is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Trsteno (ID 174238) belongs to mun. Dubrovnik (not mun. Dubrovačko primorje).
Duvrocnic (ID 215158) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).
Duprownick (ID 240566) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).
Istarska županija
Buje / Buie (ID 121607), mun. Buje: Kastel (ZIP 52460) belongs to (i.e. should be interchanged with) Kaštel (ID 212278), same mun. Buje.
Špina (ID 132969), mun. Umag is part of a settlement Đuba (no profile yet), same mun. Umag.
Brestova (ID 212227), mun. Kršan is part of a settlement Zagorje (no profile yet), same mun. Kršan.
Banjole (ID 154692) and Premantura (ID 135652) belong to mun. Medulin (not mun. Pula).
Štinjan (ID 236869), mun. Pula is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Pula / Pola (ID 77116), same mun. Pula.
Valbaldon (ID 236870), mun. Fažana is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Fažana (ID 156768), same mun. Fažana.
Barbariga (ID 179239), mun. Vodnjan is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Peroj (ID 236871), same mun. Vodnjan.
Kaštelir-Labinci (ID 187408) is not a settlement. It's a municipality.
Červar Porat (ID 195275) has a dash in the name (--> Červar-Porat).
Rovinji (ID 222949) = Rovinj / Rovigno (ID 82171).
Zadarska županija
Vlašići (ID 132292) belongs to mun. Pag (not mun. Povljana).
Jasenice (ID 189323) belongs to mun. Jasenice (not mun. Obrovac).
Lun (ID 213535) belongs to mun. Novalja, Ličko-senjska (not mun Pag, Zadarska).
Vrgada (ID 223675) belongs to mun. Pakoštane (not mun. Biograd na Moru).
Borik (ID 190475), mun. Zadar is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Zadar (ID 116520), same mun. Zadar.
Luka (ZIP 53282) and Luka (ZIP 23281) inside of Lúka (ID 151883) belong to Luka (no profile yet), mun. Sali, Zadarska.
Ličko-senjska županija
Žigljen (ID 188594), mun. Novalja is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Novalja (ID 146688), same mun. Novalja.
Janjče (ID 190476), mun. Otočac (and probabily Janjce (ZIP 2****) (--> toll station!) inside of Kosa Janjačka (ID 190957), mun. Perušič) are part of a settlement Ramljani (no pofile yet), mun. Otočac.
Tovarnele (ID 231775), mun. Novalja is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Lun (ID 213535), same mun. Novalja.
Karlovačka županija
Ozalj (ID 226471) belongs to mun. Ozalj (not mun. Karlovac).
Splitsko-dalmatinska županija
Kaštela (ID 45405) are not a settlement, only a municipality.
Selca (ID 91157), mun. Selca: Selce (ZIP 51266) belongs to Selce (no profile yet), mun. Crikvenica, Pimorsko-goranska. (Also Selce (ZIP 752) inside of the same profile doesn't belong here, but because ZIP code is corrupted, it's hard to locate this place --> There are more places with te same name.)
Brač (ID 195755) is not a settlement nor municipality, only island.
Split Airport (ID 222422) should be integrated with original name (--> Zračna luka Split / Split Airport).
Krapinsko-zagorska županija
Macelj (ID 221655), mun. Đurmanec is not s settlement. Most probabily should be merged with Gornji Macelj (ID 32547) (--> toll station), same mun. Đurmanec.
Primorsko-goranska županija
Kikovica (ID 174964), mun. Čavle is part of a settlement Soboli (no profile yet), same mun. Čavle.
Valbiska (ID 223020), mun. Krk is part of a settlement Pinezići (no profile yet), same mun. Krk.
Martinšćica (ID 59097) belongs to mun. Cres (not mun. Kostrena).
Kostrena (ID 192775), mun. Kostrena is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Kamo Škrila (ID 197524), mun. Punat should be merged with Stara Baška (ID 197395), same mun. Punat.
Supertarska Draga (ID 220692), mun. Rab has to be renamed (--> Supetarska Draga).
Zagrebačka županija
Rugvica (ID 146864), Donja Greda (ID 210566) and Sop (ID 179720) belong to mun. Rugvica (not mun. Dugo Selo or mun. Ivanić-Grad).
Osječko-baranjska županija
Djakovo (ID 225505) has to be renamed (--> Đakovo).
Dubrovačko-neretvanska županija
Zavalatica (ID 131198) is part of a settlement Čara (no profile yet), mun. Korčula.
Lastovo (ID 157934) has to be split: Ubli (ZIP 20290) is an independent settlement (same mun. Lastovo).
Konavle (ID 204114), mun. Konavle is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Trsteno (ID 174238) belongs to mun. Dubrovnik (not mun. Dubrovačko primorje).
Duvrocnic (ID 215158) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).
Duprownick (ID 240566) = Dubrovnik (ID 22862).
Istarska županija
Buje / Buie (ID 121607), mun. Buje: Kastel (ZIP 52460) belongs to (i.e. should be interchanged with) Kaštel (ID 212278), same mun. Buje.
Špina (ID 132969), mun. Umag is part of a settlement Đuba (no profile yet), same mun. Umag.
Brestova (ID 212227), mun. Kršan is part of a settlement Zagorje (no profile yet), same mun. Kršan.
Banjole (ID 154692) and Premantura (ID 135652) belong to mun. Medulin (not mun. Pula).
Štinjan (ID 236869), mun. Pula is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Pula / Pola (ID 77116), same mun. Pula.
Valbaldon (ID 236870), mun. Fažana is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Fažana (ID 156768), same mun. Fažana.
Barbariga (ID 179239), mun. Vodnjan is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Peroj (ID 236871), same mun. Vodnjan.
Kaštelir-Labinci (ID 187408) is not a settlement. It's a municipality.
Červar Porat (ID 195275) has a dash in the name (--> Červar-Porat).
Rovinji (ID 222949) = Rovinj / Rovigno (ID 82171).
Zadarska županija
Vlašići (ID 132292) belongs to mun. Pag (not mun. Povljana).
Jasenice (ID 189323) belongs to mun. Jasenice (not mun. Obrovac).
Lun (ID 213535) belongs to mun. Novalja, Ličko-senjska (not mun Pag, Zadarska).
Vrgada (ID 223675) belongs to mun. Pakoštane (not mun. Biograd na Moru).
Borik (ID 190475), mun. Zadar is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Zadar (ID 116520), same mun. Zadar.
Luka (ZIP 53282) and Luka (ZIP 23281) inside of Lúka (ID 151883) belong to Luka (no profile yet), mun. Sali, Zadarska.
Ličko-senjska županija
Žigljen (ID 188594), mun. Novalja is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Novalja (ID 146688), same mun. Novalja.
Janjče (ID 190476), mun. Otočac (and probabily Janjce (ZIP 2****) (--> toll station!) inside of Kosa Janjačka (ID 190957), mun. Perušič) are part of a settlement Ramljani (no pofile yet), mun. Otočac.
Tovarnele (ID 231775), mun. Novalja is part of settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Lun (ID 213535), same mun. Novalja.
Karlovačka županija
Ozalj (ID 226471) belongs to mun. Ozalj (not mun. Karlovac).
Splitsko-dalmatinska županija
Kaštela (ID 45405) are not a settlement, only a municipality.
Selca (ID 91157), mun. Selca: Selce (ZIP 51266) belongs to Selce (no profile yet), mun. Crikvenica, Pimorsko-goranska. (Also Selce (ZIP 752) inside of the same profile doesn't belong here, but because ZIP code is corrupted, it's hard to locate this place --> There are more places with te same name.)
Brač (ID 195755) is not a settlement nor municipality, only island.
Split Airport (ID 222422) should be integrated with original name (--> Zračna luka Split / Split Airport).
Krapinsko-zagorska županija
Macelj (ID 221655), mun. Đurmanec is not s settlement. Most probabily should be merged with Gornji Macelj (ID 32547) (--> toll station), same mun. Đurmanec.
Primorsko-goranska županija
Kikovica (ID 174964), mun. Čavle is part of a settlement Soboli (no profile yet), same mun. Čavle.
Valbiska (ID 223020), mun. Krk is part of a settlement Pinezići (no profile yet), same mun. Krk.
Martinšćica (ID 59097) belongs to mun. Cres (not mun. Kostrena).
Kostrena (ID 192775), mun. Kostrena is only a municipality - there's no settlement with such name.
Kamo Škrila (ID 197524), mun. Punat should be merged with Stara Baška (ID 197395), same mun. Punat.
Supertarska Draga (ID 220692), mun. Rab has to be renamed (--> Supetarska Draga).
Zagrebačka županija
Rugvica (ID 146864), Donja Greda (ID 210566) and Sop (ID 179720) belong to mun. Rugvica (not mun. Dugo Selo or mun. Ivanić-Grad).
Osječko-baranjska županija
Djakovo (ID 225505) has to be renamed (--> Đakovo).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
This Haaren is not in the Netherlands, but in Germany. The coordinates are 51.565°N, 8.727°E.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Corrected and placed in municipality Bad Wünnenberg
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple 3 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Thanks! Ald would you be so kind to add Oberelsungen (Gemeinde Zierenberg) as well? The coordinates are 51.375°N, 9.229°E.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done.Elmo wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:21 pmThanks! Ald would you be so kind to add Oberelsungen (Gemeinde Zierenberg) as well? The coordinates are 51.375°N, 9.229°E.
- tigerpranke
- Euro-Master
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:20 pm
- Location: Dingolfing, Germany
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Please do the plotters a little favour:
Give them some time to do their job - at least 48 hours. Normally most of the places get their coordinates within one week, but nobody is perfect. Not every country is monitored by a plotter, so we are thankful for your requests.
BTW: It's totally understandable that you want to see new dots on your map as soon as possible - so do I
Give them some time to do their job - at least 48 hours. Normally most of the places get their coordinates within one week, but nobody is perfect. Not every country is monitored by a plotter, so we are thankful for your requests.
BTW: It's totally understandable that you want to see new dots on your map as soon as possible - so do I
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I worked out the list, some profiles i didn't changed.
Brestova; Wikipedia says it is a village
Valbaldon Wikipedia says Valbandon is a village
Žigljen; wikipedia says it is a port-village
Janjče; google map says Janjče, 53202, Kosa Janjačka, Croatia and nearby petrol station CRODUX - Janjče zapad 53202, Perušić,
Macelj: Wikipedia says it is a village divided into Gornji Macelj (Upper) and Donji Macelj (Lower)
Valbiska: wikipedia says it is a village
Thank you for the list. can you check it again, if you have other info please let me know and than I can change it
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple 3 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Thank you for that!
Dubrovačko-neretvanska županija
Čara (ID 131198) belongs to mun. Korčula (not Smokvica).
Istarska županija
Kaštel (ID 212278) = Kaštel (ID 241770)
Brestova (ID 212227), mun. Kršan is part of a settlement Zagorje (no profile yet), same mun. Kršan.
That's not correct. Here's a list of settlements in mun. Kršan (not avaliable in English): https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kr%C5%A1an. You can check the extent of Zagorje also on Google Maps: https://www.google.si/maps/place/52234, ... 6898?hl=sl
You're right (--> since 2011). In Google Maps they are not separated yet.
Ličko-senjska županija
Žigljen (ID 188594), mun. Novalja is part of a settlement (i.e. should be merged with) Novalja (ID 146688), same mun. Novalja.
It's a port but not independent settlement. Here's a list of these in mun. Novalja: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novalja. Same on Google Maps.
Janjče (ID 190476), mun. Otočac (and probabily Janjce (ZIP 2****) (--> toll station!) inside of Kosa Janjačka (ID 190957), mun. Perušič) are part of a settlement Ramljani (no pofile yet), mun. Otočac.
These are just ZIP codes. The settlement is Ramljani: https://www.google.si/maps/place/53224, ... 0986?hl=sl. Here's a list of settlements in mun. Otočac (on the bottom): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oto%C4%8Dac
Krapinsko-zagorska županija
Macelj (ID 221655), mun. Đurmanec is not s settlement. Most probabily should be merged with Gornji Macelj (ID 32547) (--> toll station), same mun. Đurmanec.
I know. I just wanted to say it needs to be merged with one of these two and the first has a toll station, so it has to be the right one.
Primorsko-goranska županija
Valbiska (ID 223020), mun. Krk is part of a settlement Pinezići (no profile yet), same mun. Krk.
It's only a small port. Here's a list of villages that belong to Krk (in the middle): https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krk_(grad). Google Maps (Valbiska on the south): https://www.google.si/maps/place/Pinezi ... 8276?hl=sl
Kostrena (ZIP 51221) inside of Randići (ID 192775), mun. Kostrena. --> Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put it under Kostrena Sveta Lucija which is the seat of mun.
Zagrebačka županija
Sop (ID 179720) belongs to mun. Rugvica (not mun. Ivanić-Grad).
You made a mistake with Trsteno (ID 174238). It belongs to mun. Dubrovnik (not mun. Dubrava, Zagrebačka).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I think we are there now
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple 3 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Thank you for your effort!
It's only one small thing left. There's been a missunderstanding regarding Macelj, mun. Đurmanec, Krapinsko-zagorska županija. There are two separate settlements: Gornji Macelj and Donji Macelj. Now there's only one (Macelj) which has to be split and "Macelj" (without adjective) belongs to Gornji Macelj (--> toll station).
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Hits: 616x , 277x , 52x , 24x , 10x , 7x , 5x , 5x , 3x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x ME, 1x , 1x , 1x , 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
- eddydevries
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 20029
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
- Location: Rotterdam (NL)
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
One user enter his notes from Zwankendamme as "Zwankandamme" (last link is of his note)
Please add the coordinates like this note.
If it's not possible to copy the coordinates from another note (I think it's better to have the least different coordinates for the same city-postcode-combination), you can use N 51.309938, E 3.196636.
And than merge this city profile into Zwankendamme.
Please add the coordinates like this note.
If it's not possible to copy the coordinates from another note (I think it's better to have the least different coordinates for the same city-postcode-combination), you can use N 51.309938, E 3.196636.
And than merge this city profile into Zwankendamme.
Eddy - Rotterdam - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.
Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.
Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 250 Hits with 2 triple 3 410
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog