The new EU
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
The new EU
Hi! I'm curious to know your opinions and ideas about the topic, which is, IMHO, very interesting.
My preference goes to Federalistic
My preference goes to Federalistic
The new EU
I agree with you.pinguino79 wrote: Hi! I'm curious to know your opinions and ideas about the topic, which is, IMHO, very interesting.
My preference goes to Federalistic
We have to share our strength for subjects such as environnement, food policy, immigration, taxes, equality, human rights, foreign policy... but keep our own cultures which are our roots and identity.
I'd like more democracy in the EU. When will we elect a president or a prime minister?
Do you think Brussels will be the federal capital of Europe?
Olivier
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
The new EU
I was almost sure you'd have been the first one to commentOlivier wrote: I agree with you.
We have to share our strength for subjects such as environnement, food policy, immigration, taxes, equality, human rights, foreign policy... but keep our own cultures which are our roots and identity.
I'd like more democracy in the EU. When will we elect a president or a prime minister?
Do you think Brussels will be the federal capital of Europe?
So, this is my opinion: everyone agrees that EU is NOT democratic; the Parliament, elected, has very few powers, which are instead in the hands of few "eurocrats". The euro is just the first step, then there will be all the things you already listed (but I'd add also a common army).
BTW, the low democracy wasn't a real problem, 'cause crucial decisions were taken by the national governements. I don't know when we'll elect a president or a prime minister, this depends on the convention; Brussels will be the federal capital, but only because it's the seat of the Parliament.
You said the best thing: each country has to keep its own culture and identity, though partecipating to european integration: the real richness of Europe is not the euro, it's the cultural differences which MUST be preserved.
A misc note about this: the idea of common and national sides in coins is great, and making them legal in all ?-zone sounds like sharing our identities with the other countries (and, of course, we can collect coins )
The new EU
pinguino79 wrote:
I was almost sure you'd have been the first one to comment
You start to know me well...
When will the Convention propose its project of Constitution?pinguino79 wrote: I don't know when we'll elect a president or a prime minister, this depends on the convention;
I hope it wil be before the enlargement...
Yes! I agree with you!pinguino79 wrote: You said the best thing: each country has to keep its own culture and identity, though partecipating to european integration: the real richness of Europe is not the euro, it's the cultural differences which MUST be preserved.
O.
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
The new EU
According to the official news, there are no fixed dates, but last term is late 2004.Olivier wrote: When will the Convention propose its project of Constitution?
I hope it wil be before the enlargement...
I think there's no problem with enlargement, 'cause in the convention there are also the candidate countries; but I read just this morning on an italian newsmagazine that there are good chances that in _this_ year some countries will join EU.
The new EU
You mean that some countries could join on january 1st 2003?pinguino79 wrote: I read just this morning on an italian newsmagazine that there are good chances that in _this_ year some countries will join EU.
There must be a referendum in each candidate country, I guess... and before the Parlement of Strasbourg has to close the negociations... ?
I think they might join in 2004, just before the general elections of june 2004 for the euro-parlement. ?
O.
Olympics Games of 2004
Do you think our champions will participate united under the euro banner, for the Olympics of Athens 2004? )pinguino79 wrote: My preference goes to Federalistic
O.
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
The new EU
This is my opinion, too, but I was just reporting what I read (and I can't be sure if the source is trusty ).Olivier wrote: You mean that some countries could join on january 1st 2003?
There must be a referendum in each candidate country, I guess... and before the Parlement of Strasbourg has to close the negociations... ?
I think they might join in 2004, just before the general elections of june 2004 for the euro-parlement. ?
But it seems to me there's too much hurry; this year the common currency, now the convention together with the enlargement... too much things at the same time.
BTW: are we the only ones interested in the topic? I expected more people to reply
And I hope you joined the ECC usergroup
The new EU
It's not really in the hurry! Euro has been existing for 3 years. The decision has bee made in 1993 !pinguino79 wrote: But it seems to me there's too much hurry; this year the common currency, now the convention together with the enlargement... too much things at the same time.
Now the economical Europe is almost made. It's now the turn of a political union.
The French were in favor of Euro, Germany less. Germany is leading for a federal Europe, France less... but the opinions change and french seam to be federalist (forums on the net), at least to get more democracy.
The enlargement has begun in the 1995's. 2004... it's been for 10 years.
I think so, for the moment.pinguino79 wrote: BTW: are we the only ones interested in the topic? I expected more people to reply
Yes! I joined this morning !pinguino79 wrote: And I hope you joined the ECC usergroup
Olivier
Olympics
How? what are the rules, for the competitors?smh wrote:Not if that means we can only send 3 competitors in each fieldDo you think our champions will participate united under the euro banner, for the Olympics of Athens 2004? )
The american and russian delegations are always very important...
Olivier
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
The new EU
Sure! And to be more precise, the first ideas for a common currency were expressed in 1988! The funny thing is that at the time it seemed to be a vision, and now the convention is working on a constitution!Olivier wrote: It's not really in the hurry! Euro has been existing for 3 years. The decision has bee made in 1993 !
Now the economical Europe is almost made. It's now the turn of a political union.
I think all countries prefere a federalistic union; the main discussions will be about which power should be moved to EU and which should remain to national governements.The French were in favor of Euro, Germany less. Germany is leading for a federal Europe, France less... but the opinions change and french seam to be federalist (forums on the net), at least to get more democracy.
No, I couldn't agree with that, at least not in the short term. Maybe in 40 or 50 years, but not now.Hi! I'm curious to know your opinions and ideas about the topic, which is, IMHO, very interesting.
My preference goes to Federalistic
Certainly there is room for greater cooperation (foriegn policy, international law, etc.) but there are some areas that should not be touched (eg tax). Tax harmonisation is bad. The arguments put forward by those who favour tax harmonisation are fallacious. It won't encourage a "race to the bottom" - corporate tax rates lowered to "steal" inward investment from European partners. There is no evidence for this and plenty against. Those countries that wish to keep taxes high to fund a strong social welfare system are welcome to do. But don't try and force it down the throats of countries who have decided that that way lies stagnation.
I remember reading a report in the Economist - I think, sorry, no cite - which even suggested that tax competition was a way of levelling the playing field. For countries such as Ireland which are in a non-central location it was the only way of reclaiming the advantage that countries such as the Netherlands, France etc. have. That of a central location.
But in principle I am all for a coherent and strong EU. In fact, I would say that I usually consider myself more "European" than "Irish". Though I am put to shame by the multilinguists who post here.
Simon
- pinguino79
- Euro-Expert in Training
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 5:44 pm
- Location: Vicenza, Italy, EU
Thanks for the postMoneyHog wrote: Certainly there is room for greater cooperation (foriegn policy, international law, etc.) but there are some areas that should not be touched (eg tax).
I think too that a common foreign policy is essential; then there could be a stronger cooperation on other less critic areas, but things like school system and, yes, taxes, should remain to the national governements.
One thing: I wrote federalistic meaning this (see also my previous posts on the topic), but maybe the word is wrong; perhaps confederation woul've been better. So, now, I'm getting back to my English books
The new EU
On your opinion, which powers should remain national and which one should become federal?pinguino79 wrote:I think all countries prefere a federalistic union; the main discussions will be about which power should be moved to EU and which should remain to national governements.