i strongly believe its one person corazonneke is rupeltje, to bad he's a faker now because i had a hit whit him a while ago
Suspicious notes and users
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
- tinka
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:57 pm
- Location: hoboken, antwerpen, belgium
damn, other fake hits between corazonneke and rupeltje
i strongly believe its one person corazonneke is rupeltje, to bad he's a faker now because i had a hit whit him a while ago
(that was not a fake , believe me)
i strongly believe its one person corazonneke is rupeltje, to bad he's a faker now because i had a hit whit him a while ago
click me please, im saving points for a IPod
http://www.ipodvoorniks.nl/?page=clicks&ref=7801
http://www.ipodvoorniks.nl/?page=clicks&ref=7801
- bhoeyb
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 3:58 pm
- Location: Herentals - Belgium
- Contact:
This: ' http://users.skynet.be/rupeltje ' is at the profile of corazonneketinka wrote:I strongly believe its one person corazonneke is rupeltje, to bad he's a faker now because i had a hit whit him a while ago(that was not a fake , believe me)
.- airis
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: Rovaniemi, Lapland, Finland
I think they are friends. ---> So these are "friend hits", but your hit is still a real one.tinka wrote:damn, other fake hits between corazonneke and rupeltje
i strongly believe its one person corazonneke is rupeltje, to bad he's a faker now because i had a hit whit him a while ago(that was not fake , believe me)
Edit: Like bhoeyb wrote
- avij
- Forum Moderator

- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 10:45 pm
- Location: Helsinki Finland
- Contact:
Re: fake user!!!!
Well, I hope the other people living in your city are smarter than he is. Here's my message and his reply:airis wrote:I am so sad that a user in my hometown is doing this.Fons wrote:User Jempha made some entries:
(emphasis mine)Jempha wrote:Miksi ihmeessä??avij wrote:Jospa nyt kuitenkin lopettaisit niiden feikkiseteleiden kirjaamisen EBT:hen. Sopiiko?
Eurobilltracker Support Team/avij
Quick translation: "It'd be nice if you stopped entering those fake notes into EBT, OK? -- Why should I ??
Oh dear
- !Pretfles!
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 6:20 pm
- Location: Mechelen (Flanders,Belgium)
- Contact:
Isn't that enough reason to block him, or to erase his account?
My Flickr
Personal Blog
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
('.)_('.) webpage to help him gain world domination.
Personal Blog
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
('.)_('.) webpage to help him gain world domination.
FAKE HITS!!
retsi and Pekka Thai:
why aren't they blocked?! or deleted...?
2003-11-19 19:48:43 Lxxxx6426xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:48:43 Lxxxx2833xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx1582xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx2807xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx1551xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx3246xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx2863xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:43:10 Lxxxx6582xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:43:10 Xxxxx3580xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9973xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx2522xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx7797xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9941xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9546xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx4082xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:31 Lxxxx1792xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:31 Lxxxx2488xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:30 Lxxxx7247xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:30 Lxxxx9887xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
And what about rene en sandra and hauwaert n:
2003-11-19 20:11:48 Xxxxx4124xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:10:44 Uxxxx6485xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:08:57 Zxxxx2900xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:07:02 Xxxxx6575xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:05:33 Zxxxx7370xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:04:13 Xxxxx2799xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 19:59:13 Uxxxx7111xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
why aren't they blocked?! or deleted...?
2003-11-19 19:48:43 Lxxxx6426xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:48:43 Lxxxx2833xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx1582xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx2807xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx1551xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx3246xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:45:50 Lxxxx2863xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:43:10 Lxxxx6582xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:43:10 Xxxxx3580xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9973xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx2522xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx7797xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9941xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx9546xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:40:34 Lxxxx4082xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:31 Lxxxx1792xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:31 Lxxxx2488xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:30 Lxxxx7247xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
2003-11-19 19:37:30 Lxxxx9887xxx Pekka Thai - retsi - Pekka Thai
And what about rene en sandra and hauwaert n:
2003-11-19 20:11:48 Xxxxx4124xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:10:44 Uxxxx6485xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:08:57 Zxxxx2900xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:07:02 Xxxxx6575xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:05:33 Zxxxx7370xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 20:04:13 Xxxxx2799xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
2003-11-19 19:59:13 Uxxxx7111xxx rene en sandra - hauwaert n
- airis
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: Rovaniemi, Lapland, Finland
Yes, he is faking.bhoeyb wrote:Jempha is entering for fake notes: see bill ID 1415823 till 1415836. That's all I could see but probably, there are more
.
I suggest to block his account so he can't mess up our database anymore, despite his real entries (sorry Airis).
- avij
- Forum Moderator

- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon May 27, 2002 10:45 pm
- Location: Helsinki Finland
- Contact:
Jempha ... has been taken care of. After I sent the email I mentioned above, I waited to see if he had stopped doing the strange things. Looks like he entered another batch of 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500e notes after he wrote his initial reply, so he didn't seem to care about my warning and I had to do something.
I deleted all those notes that had been inserted with all the denominations (35 distinct serials, 228 entries in the database). I told him that and warned that if he doesn't start behaving, I'll delete ALL his notes from the database. I offered him an opportunity to start playing by the rules again and everything would be OK. After all, he had (and still has) 337 real note entries in EBT.
But. He went completely nuts about the fact that I had deleted those invalid entries, saying that there were real notes among those. This might be true and I'm perfectly aware of that, but it really wasn't worth the effort to determine which entry is the valid one among 6 invalid ones and this would have to be done for all the 35 notes individually. Basically, he lost all the notes he had entered since 12th November.
In his second email he wrote to say that he noticed that I was indeed serious about deleting those notes and said he'd quit because all his notes from the last two weeks (although one week would have been more accurate) had been deleted.
In his third (and hopefully the last) email he wrote to inform me about his opinion that "avij must be f*cking bored because avij watches what kind of notes the other EBT users enter". Oh, there were tons of other 4-letter-words among all the emails I received but I don't wish to reproduce them here.
How .. encouraging
I won't write a reply to him.
edit: The number of removed notes was actually 20, not 35. There were 20 notes which had been found and entered after Nov 12, and 15 notes that he has had before but re-entered again with more denominations. I was able to clean up the group of 15 notes, but the group of 20 notes would have been harder. I did this when I first deleted the notes, I just forgot to mention it in my message.
I deleted all those notes that had been inserted with all the denominations (35 distinct serials, 228 entries in the database). I told him that and warned that if he doesn't start behaving, I'll delete ALL his notes from the database. I offered him an opportunity to start playing by the rules again and everything would be OK. After all, he had (and still has) 337 real note entries in EBT.
But. He went completely nuts about the fact that I had deleted those invalid entries, saying that there were real notes among those. This might be true and I'm perfectly aware of that, but it really wasn't worth the effort to determine which entry is the valid one among 6 invalid ones and this would have to be done for all the 35 notes individually. Basically, he lost all the notes he had entered since 12th November.
In his second email he wrote to say that he noticed that I was indeed serious about deleting those notes and said he'd quit because all his notes from the last two weeks (although one week would have been more accurate) had been deleted.
In his third (and hopefully the last) email he wrote to inform me about his opinion that "avij must be f*cking bored because avij watches what kind of notes the other EBT users enter". Oh, there were tons of other 4-letter-words among all the emails I received but I don't wish to reproduce them here.
How .. encouraging
edit: The number of removed notes was actually 20, not 35. There were 20 notes which had been found and entered after Nov 12, and 15 notes that he has had before but re-entered again with more denominations. I was able to clean up the group of 15 notes, but the group of 20 notes would have been harder. I did this when I first deleted the notes, I just forgot to mention it in my message.
Last edited by avij on Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- nodisch18
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 8:25 pm
- Location: Sint-Oedenrode
- Contact:
We sure do!!!Aaron wrote:That's it - in your position you get all kind of sh*t from frustrated fakers.avij wrote:How .. encouragingI won't write a reply to him.
Nevertheless, someone has to do it and we are glad you've taken the responsibility and - have to say it again - we appreciate your work.
Don't let those fakers break you! We know how commited you aare and we really appreciate your work!!
- Annie_in_exile
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 987
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 2:51 pm
- Location: Brussels
- Contact:
Well done. That's the kind of behaviour I don't understand. You've been extremely considerate and kind when first approaching and warning someone. If they misbehave after that, there shouldn't be any reason for complaining about the consequences.
There's a famous slogan: "Don't mess with Texas". Maybe Avij should adopt a new signature: "Don't mess with me" ?
There's a famous slogan: "Don't mess with Texas". Maybe Avij should adopt a new signature: "Don't mess with me" ?