Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

[opalon]

Hello,

Could someone give me the exact city of the Antalya Airport?

For my part, I found "Lara, Antalya, Muratpaşa".

When I do a search GPS coordinates, I found this:
Latitude: 36.89867
Longitude: 30.800491999999963

Thanks a lot

Anybody can help me for this?

[LArdennais]

I added another translation to the database: Gembloers can be integrated in the profile of Gembloux.

So groentje in the same thing... Jurbeke can be integrated in the profile of Jurbise

Alles zijn gedoen, groentje

[Dioniz]

Please merge these profiles (last one is correct):
Velika planina ~ 1534 m with Velika Planina;
Radovljic with Radovljica;
Dobrova-Polhov Gradec with Dobrova;
Spodnje pirniče with Spodnje Pirniče;
Šmarje-Sap with Šmarje - Sap;
Bagonya with Bogojina;
Domžale Vir with Vir;
Lendva with Lendava / Lendva;
Ljubljane, Ljubljanja and Šiška with Ljubljana;
Mavčice with Mavčiče;
Logatlec with Logatec;
Ptujska cesta with Gornja Radgona;
Catez ob sabi with Čatež ob Savi;
Zrece with Zreče.

Please rename:
Topol to "Topol pri Begunjah";
Grad to "Grad (Cerklje na Gorenjskem)";
Ribnica to "Ribnica (Postojna)".

Please create new profiles:
Puscava 15 8230 Mokronog should be "Puščava" (belongs to Municipality Trebnje);
Loka pri mengšu should be "Loka pri Mengšu" (belongs to Municipality Domžale);
Podolseva should be "Podolševa" (belongs to Municipality Mozirje).

[Jackgaillard]

Hello, new city profile : could you please add this ?
Hartennes-et-Taux (02210) here with this note here
on wiki Hartennes-et-Taux (02210)
GPS : 49.274973 N, 3.352203 E
Thanks to LArdennais adding red dot but I miss Level 1 and level 2 entries

Hartennes-et-Taux (02210) is in :

Région (Level 1) : Picardie : http://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?region=2112" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Département : (Level 2) : Aisne : http://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?region=2188" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

thanks by advance
Jack

[mizar]

...

[mizar]

Here's my take on these corrections (1st group above is fine, merge everything):

Please rename:
Topol to "Topol pri Begunjah";
Grad to "Grad (Cerklje na Gorenjskem)";
Ribnica to "Ribnica (Postojna)".

Don't change anything here:
#1 - EBT has correct info, it's a village in Bloke municipality called just "Topol" (Topol pri Begunjah is a different village in Cerknica municipality)
#2 and #3 - EBT can handle places with the same name in different municipalities, so there's no need for the info in parentheses as it's not part of the official name. You can see which one is meant on the city profile page if necessary.

Please create new profiles:
Puscava 15 8230 Mokronog should be "Puščava" (belongs to Municipality Trebnje);
Loka pri mengšu should be "Loka pri Mengšu" (belongs to Municipality Domžale);
Podolseva should be "Podolševa" (belongs to Municipality Mozirje).

What you wrote are NOT municipalities but administrative units (or municipalities in Yugoslav times). Spelling corrections are correct (to be done), but Puščava is in Mokronog - Trebelno municipality, Loka pri Mengšu is in Mengeš municipality and Podolševa is already correctly placed in Solčava municipality, so just rename it.

[eddydevries]

Please rename:
Topol to "Topol pri Begunjah";
Grad to "Grad (Cerklje na Gorenjskem)";
Ribnica to "Ribnica (Postojna)".

Don't change anything here:

#2 and #3 - EBT can handle places with the same name in different municipalities, so there's no need for the info in parentheses as it's not part of the official name. You can see which one is meant on the city profile page if necessary.

That's not always correct. Sometimes if you enter notes from one village, they're placed in another city-profile.

But you can see which "Ribnica" is meant where when you look at this list (if nothing was added)?
That's why normally the name of the region (or when they're in the same region: the name of the municipality) is added into the name of the city-profile. It's already added to the name of the other city-profile (Ribnica na Pohorju), so why wouldn't you add it to the other city-profile too?

[klapotec]

why would you, if there's different postal codes and the official name doesn't include the region?
IMO if there's official names, they should be preferred

[eddydevries]

why would you, if there's different postal codes and the official name doesn't include the region?
IMO if there's official names, they should be preferred

Because it's possible that if you enter a note in such a city, it's added to the city-profile of another city with the same name (even if that's in another country). Because it is plotted automatically, the plotters don't receive a message that there's a note which need attention.
That was solved by adding the name of the province: than it automatically moved to the right city (the city-managers didn't need to do something here). (a note received in this Bergen was automatically placed in this Bergen).
So if you add the region, you're sure the note will get into the right profile.

[opalon]

Hi,

Could you please merge this two city :

1 => this city Wezembeek Opem is not correct spelling. So EBT make a new city. But the official city are this : Wezembeek-Oppem

2 => this city Rhode-Saint-Genèsep0pp0aaaz0 is not correct spelling. So EBT make a new city. But the official city are this : Sint-Genesius-Rode / Rhode-Saint-Genèse

Many thanks

[LArdennais]

Done.

[kayhh]

Position on map for DE-23946 Boltenhagen is not correct. N 54° 3' 54.2514", E 13° 36' 48.8484"

[kayhh]

Please merge AT-2320 Schwechat-Zwölfaxing with AT-2322 Zwölfaxing 48° 6′ 34″ N, 16° 27′ 44″ E 48.109444°, 16.462222°

[ErGo]

Please merge AT-2320 Schwechat-Zwölfaxing with AT-2322 Zwölfaxing 48° 6′ 34″ N, 16° 27′ 44″ E 48.109444°, 16.462222°

This request was already made in the german thread and was also answered there.

[eddydevries]

Position on map for DE-23946 Boltenhagen is not correct. N 54° 3' 54.2514", E 13° 36' 48.8484"

To make it easier to place the coordinates: N 54.065070°, E 13.613569° (the coordinates has to be added in the decimal format)