Yes...Skylimit wrote:Ah, you finally got to know him ...Olivier wrote:Louis Michel told about the need for Europe of its own army!
Does the EU still exist?
unfortunetly that's true.. more terrorism ---> more fear ----> moer clear election victoriesOlivier wrote:Skylimit wrote:Nope, good work. More terrorism = more pre-emptive war !Olivier wrote: Bush JR is on the good way to do like his father... but with more collateral damages: a stronger anti-americanism all over the world, a scepticist GB, angry Arabs...
Bad work!
I think they know what they are doing, and don't care about consequenses on their own citizins (a bit like Saddam)![]()
I think Germany would participate also. There is already a franco-german soldier unity. GB and France are for such an european army!Skylimit wrote:My best guess is that the EU-army will be an experiment from the founding members ... Benelux-France-Germany and Italy.
I doubt, even that the Netherlands and Italy would participate ...
France, Belgium and Germany are in for it.
Italy will follow if the 5 other foundating members do it, I guess...
I don't agree on it. I thought it first, but I have changed my mind. These countries have waited for more than 10 years to get in the Union. If the rules are done before the enlargment, there can't be any veto.Skylimit wrote: I think the enlargement of the EU was a big mistake !
The most important is to have the EU Constitution before may 2004!
I guess the enthousiasm for the euro will be there liks it was in Europe last year. It's the only real symbol of Europe we have.Skylimit wrote: It will be a free trade zone, and nothing more. The Euro, and also the Euro in the new member states, however, would be a good thing.
There will be a new one soon: the European Social Security card...
In Canada, we have a Social Insurance ID, delivered by each Province, but available in all Canada.
So am I!Skylimit wrote: I am in for a stronger Europe : Economically, politically & military. This will never be a fact with 28 members who all hold a veto.
In fact, no decision will ever be decided on, ever again.
The future constitution is clear on that. The decisions will be taken by majority, no more by unanimity.
recently I read an article that said the majority of St Miqueleans were against the euro, they prefered the franc, because they feel french but not european, since they are North Americans...Olivier wrote:Yes, true!BossaNova wrote:hmm and also St. Miqueleans..French North Americans..
bn![]()
There are also south american!In Guyane!
And what about the people of Guadeloupe, Martinique, Saint-Barthélémy, Saint-Martin... ?
bn
- eurobillsandcoins
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 2:55 am
- Location: Hong Kong SAR
- Contact:
- eurobillsandcoins
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 2:55 am
- Location: Hong Kong SAR
- Contact:
- eurobillsandcoins
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 2:55 am
- Location: Hong Kong SAR
- Contact:
- eurobillsandcoins
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 754
- Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 2:55 am
- Location: Hong Kong SAR
- Contact:
They can't keep the veto...Skylimit wrote:I took the opposite direction. I was very enthousiastic, but with the latest developments, I am pessimistic.Olivier wrote: I don't agree on it. I thought it first, but I have changed my mind. .
If they take out the veto, we may have something going...
V. Giscard d'Estaing told it several times...

