Definitly... but on the other hand, it would be hard for a "real democratic, elected" european gouvernment to support the US policy with the 80% no-war EuropeansAaron wrote:At least it's far better than a common European government which is supporting the USA policy...Olivier wrote: I agree, but at the same time we would not have got internal fights inside Europe. France + Germany + Belgium... / GB + Spain + Portugal...![]()
I agree with you!Aaron wrote: On the top of that, the structure of today's EU system is totally incompenent for a (con)federation. It's horribly slow and ineffective, far too bureaucratic. On the other hand, it's difficult to make it operative without reducing democracy and control against bribing.
I don't want a president named by his pears. I wish him/her to be elected.
Aaron wrote: Again one reason why EU should get rid of NATO. Times have changed since the days when NATO was founded. I think this is not really what the old member countries wanted when they joined to the organisation.
True, but I don't think countries like Denmark, Great Britain, Spain... will agree to get rid of NATO for a european independant army.
Yes, but they now need a kind of legitimacy, since the US soldiers get bullets in south of Irak. Legitimacy means also... mon€y.Aaron wrote:USA is worried about UN only when it suits their needs. You can see USA has totally paralysed UN.Olivier wrote:The USA can't afford of ruining all the alliances, ruining the UN...
I wonder what will happen. In my opinion the collapse will be soon, and as brutal as the fall of the Berlin Wall.Aaron wrote: It's an interesting article. Some economy gurus counted 25 years time for USA until their economy collapses to an economical crisis. They reduced it to 20 years when Bush Jr became president elected...![]()
China and Russia are aware of that. The links are getting stronger between these 4 poles.Aaron wrote: The bad side is the problem in today's world economy is that everything effects on everything. If, or when, USA collapses it effects everywhere in the world. Let's hope China, Russia and India will be strong factors in world economy by then because otherwise we would be alone as the EU internal demand would not be high enough to satisfy the internal supply.
About the internal demand, let's not forget that there are 280 millions of Americans, and soon 450 millions of Europeans... + a huge russian market close of Europe.
USA are no more vital for the European economy. Moreover of the europeans are payed in dollars...
This shows, according to me, that our countries are too small to face the international market, even Germany. The European Union could create a new era of prosperity with a european New Deal. The european commission has made some proposals that way. It could be great for the 10 new countries to get brand new roads, airports, motorways, bridges... It would decrease the unemployment.Aaron wrote:
On the other hand, also German economy is in a bad shape. The public sector deficit is too high and for example cities of Hamburg and Berlin have nearly bankrupted. This is a very bad thing as Germany is the economy locomotive of Europe. I don't remember exactly how big role the German gross national product has in EU but I think it's something like 40%...
The money for this would be the money the international investors put in the eurozone since it's better for them to invest here than in the USA.
The euro, its stability and strength would allow a Keynesian policy. The european market is only the half of the chinese market! Let's go! A european (elected) government would not spend its time in discussions on the majority/unanimity on the size of bananas... but would act now!

