Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
Wovychamois
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: 38068 Rovereto (TN) - Italy

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Wovychamois »

Wovychamois wrote:Thanks Androl,

all is now almost ok, except:
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=168164" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is Piazza (Terragnolo) with O at the end.

for Piscinas location http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82001708" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, the location is on the west side of Sardinia and this is the municipality of Arbus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbus_(Sardinia" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) to whom it belongs.

Why on EBT map I see the almost correct place for Cittadella (near Padua) http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=18109" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, but when I look at the map generated by google dotmap it is completely misplaced (near Forli)?
Doesn't google dotmap take the data from EBT?

Same problem for Fiumicino (00054) on EBT is correct on google dotmap is misplaced.
:flag-it: Alpca 10105 e Nunavut :flag-it: - 38068 Rovereto (TN)

:flag-eu: My EBT-profile - since 2nd September 2007
EBTCheck statistics - last updated 12th September 2020
User avatar
Wovychamois
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: 38068 Rovereto (TN) - Italy

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Wovychamois »

Wovychamois wrote:This profile (Lisboa- Sete Rios): http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=167931" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, shuold be added to Lisboa http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55600" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:flag-it: Alpca 10105 e Nunavut :flag-it: - 38068 Rovereto (TN)

:flag-eu: My EBT-profile - since 2nd September 2007
EBTCheck statistics - last updated 12th September 2020
User avatar
Crazy Bob
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7434
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Crazy Bob »

Ronchei dei Legionari appears to be a mis-spelling of Ronchi dei Legionari.
User avatar
Yelverdack
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Yelverdack »

Hi,

Missing dot in Switzerland : Saint-Imier http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=168466" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; has the following coodinates :
47°09'10'' N 7° 00' 00'' E

And another village is registered here with an wrong name :
Montagny-Chamard http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=167981" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is not a commune. The correct commune name is Montagny-près-Yverdon and the coordinates are :
46° 47' 00'' N 6° 37' 00'' E
"To be is to do". Socrates
"To do is to be". Jean-Paul Sartre
"To be do be do". Franck Sinatra

Loi de Bell : Tout corps plongé dans une baignoire entend alors le téléphone sonner.
Loi de Zenone : La file d'à côté avance toujours plus vite. Si tu changes de file, celle que tu viens de quitter deviendra alors la plus rapide.
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13442
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Saint-Maurice-sous-les-Côtes : http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=83389181" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The dot is missing (obviously, as it is a bit the middle of Nowhere :mrgreen: )

the coordinates are : 49°00'58.23'' N and 5°40' 39.03'' E

I know you want the coordinates in another shape but I never succeed to remember how to produce these coordinates
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13442
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Sommepy-Tahure = http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=83388835" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

another village lost in the middle of Nowhere :

49°15'02.15'' N and 4°33'21.85'' E
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13442
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

The two other dots are still missing, and I need to add a third one :

Grab = http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=83393560" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This village is located south of Mainhardt, and is part of Grosserlach.

precise location is :
49°02'26.70''N
9°34'31.13''E

It's also the kind of lost place, but this time, it's not in France, but in Baden-Württemberg.
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13442
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Thank you for the updates !
User avatar
Crossmaster
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1969
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Würzburg / Home of famous bocksbeutel

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Crossmaster »

Please add the profile of Honhardt to the (not yet existing) profile of Frankenhardt (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honhardt)
Doi merg prin pădure. Unul găseşte 100 de lei altul nu...

Mein Profil, meine NIG-Statistiken.
User avatar
googlejaps
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by googlejaps »

Wonderful world:

In France there's:
  • Lac Chambon, near Chambon-sur-Lac, a community in the departement Puy-de-Dôme. wiki googlemaps
  • Lac de Chambon, near Chambon, a village in the community of Éguzon, in the departement Indre. wiki googlemaps
  • Lac du Chambon, (no village with the same name), in the departement Isère.wiki googlemaps
I entered notes in Chambon (Éguzon, Indre). The city profile seems to be indicating the right spot on the map. But when I zoom in on the googlemaps dotmap, with 'locations' checked. I see the marker of chambon way out of the dot of Éguzon. About halfway between Chambon (Éguzon) and Chambon-sur-Lac. So maybe these city profiles have to be splitted.

(I couldn't find the city profile of Chambon-sur-Lac.)
User avatar
yli
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5870
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 4:34 am
Location: TILBURG
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by yli »

I have taken a closer look at the cityprofiles of :flag-lu: Luxembourg

* Basharrage is a typo for Bascharage
* please merge Bereldamge and Béreldange and rename the profile Bereldange
* Bertange and Bertrang are typos for Bertrange
* please split up the profile of Bockholtz into Bockholtz (Goesdorf) (postalcode 9637) or Bockholtz (Hosingen) (postalcode 9830)
* Bofferding is a brand of beer, so merge it with Unknown city
* please split up the profile of Brouch into Brouch (Boevange-Attert) (postalcode 7415 or 7416) or Brouch (Biwer) (postalcode 6837)
* Cappellen is a typo of Capellen
* Clerveau is a typo of Clervaux
* There are two profiles of Fischbach (1 and 2. Please rename them to Fischbach (postalcode 7430) and Fischbach (Heinerscheid) (postalcode 9749)
* please split up the profile of Fond-de-Gras into Fond-de-Gras (Differdange) (postalcodes 4501 to 4520, 4523 to 4698, and 4521) and Fond-de-Gras (Pétange) (postalcodes 4701 to 4786 and 4801 to 4888)
* please split up the profile of Heisdorf into Heisdorf (Steinsel) (postalcodes 7302 to 7349) and Heisdorf (Wincrange) (postalcodes 9xxx and higher)
* please rename Hespérange into Hesperange
* please split up the profile of Hostert into Hostert (Niederanven) (postalcodes between 6970 and 6998) and Hostert (Rambrouch) (postalcodes 8537 and 8546)
* Hudelange might be a typo for Huldange
* please split up the profile of Kockelscheuer into Kockelscheuer (Roeser) (postalcodes 1898 and 1899) and Kockelscheuer (Luxembourg) (all other postalcodes). The last one is a quarter of the city Luxembourg, so it might also be merged with Luxembourg
* Langsur isn't really a village. It's the area around a petrolstation at the A1 highway. The Luxembourgian postalservice doesn't give it a postalcode. It's best to merge it with Wasserbillig
* Lorentzeweiler is a typo of Lorentzweiler
* Martelange-Haut should be merged with Haut-Martelange
* please split up the profile of Maulusmühle into Maulusmühle (Wincrange) (postalcode 9974) and Maulusmühle (Weiswampach) (all other postalcodes)
* please merge Monnerich with Monderçange and rename it Mondercange (Monnerich is the german name, Mondercange the french name)
* please merge Müllerthal with Mullerthal (german and french for same village)
* please rename Neuhäusgen into Neuaeusgen (according to wikipedia Lëtzebuergisch the offical french and german name)
* please merge Reckeng op der Mess with Reckange-sur-Mess (Reckange-sur-Mess is the french name, Reckeng op der Mess the Lëtzebuergesch name)
* Roderhausen and Rudershausen are typos of Rodershausen
* please merge Rombach Martelange and Romback (typo) with Rombach. Martelange is a closeby village in Belgium.
* please split up the profile of Roodt into Roodt (Ell) (postalcode 8560) and Roodt (Septfontaines) (postalcode 8398)
* please split up the profile of Weiler into Weiler (Putscheid) (postalcode 9466) and Weiler (Wincrange) (postalcode 9982)

* Beggen, Bonnevoie, Cents, Gasperich, Hamm, Hollerich, Kirchberg, Kockelscheuer (mentioned before), Merl and Pulvermühl are all quaters (suburbs) of Luxembourg so the might be merged with Luxembourg

...and is it an idea to make the Luxemburgian profiles multilangual. Now the majority is in French, but also German and Lëtzebuergesch could be used.
Jelle zonder internet. Het was een leuke hobby, maar niet mijn hobby. Een leven zonder internet is mijn ding. Een leven van geld uitgeven in plaats van tracken zeg maar.... hahaha. Ja, er mag gelachen worden.
Inloggen op site lukt niet meer, maakt niet uit. Ik snap toch niets van nieuwe biljetten :lol:
User avatar
bob9
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:58 pm
Location: H:fors

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by bob9 »

Coordinates missing for Image Åsele

64.161667°N
17.352778° E
Cash is king. | My EBT profile
User avatar
eddydevries
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20032
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Rotterdam (NL)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by eddydevries »

When registrating into EBT, a new user mistyped his home-city, so a new city-profile was formed.

Please merge Hellevcoetsluis into the profile of Hellevoetsluis
Eddy - Rotterdam - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.

Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
User avatar
rlaurenssen
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 903
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 9:50 pm
Location: Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by rlaurenssen »

Please merge Stiphout http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=101928 with the city prifile
of Helmond http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=38833. I live here and Stiphout is not a
city or village, just a suburb of Helmond.
User avatar
BaliBennie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3692
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:13 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by BaliBennie »

A tricky place Stiphout......

The Dutch wikipedia says it is a village. Stiphout is een dorp en voormalige gemeente in Noord-Brabant, dat sinds 1968 deel uitmaakt van de gemeente Helmond. .................... Sinds 1968 behoort Stiphout dan ook tot de gemeente Helmond, en is deels een villadorp. .................. Daarom is het een der rijkste dorpen van Nederland.
Naburige kernen: Helmond, Mierlo-Hout, Nuenen, Gerwen, Aarle-Rixtel, Lieshout.


But at the bottom of the page it lists the wijken/suburbs of Helmond.
Gemeente Helmond
Wijken: Binnenstad-Oost · Brandevoort · Brouwhuis · Dierdonk · De Groene Loper · Helmond Centrum · Helmond Noord · Helmond-Oost · Helmond-West · Mierlo-Hout · Rijpelberg · Stiphout · Suytkade · Warande · ZonneKwartier


But on the Wikipedia page for gemeente/municipality Helmond the following is listed:
Stadsdelen (city parts)
* Brandevoort
* Brouwhuis
* Dierdonk
* De Groene Loper (in aanbouw)
* Helmond Centrum
* Binnenstad-Oost
* Helmond Noord
* Helmond Oost
* Helmond West
* Rijpelberg
* Suytkade
* Warande
* ZonneKwartier (in aanbouw)

Andere kernen binnen de gemeente (Other places in the municipality)
* Stiphout
* Mierlo-Hout



On plaatsnaamborden pagina you can see it has a white plate under the blue plate Helmond meaning it is a part of Helmond.

On the official gemeentesite of Helmond it says it is a wijk/suburb of Helmond.

Reading all this information it seems to be a special place but it is a official wijk/suburb of Helmond. I will merge the two cityprofiles.

And yes I know that wikipedia is not always right. It is just an open-source encyclopedia made by humans which can make mistakes. But in general it is a good source.
Last edited by BaliBennie on Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Visit my homepage to see my statistics, maps and more!

Look at my 5 years statistics

Er gaat niets boven Groningen EBT
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”