an-148 wrote:little reminder![]()
an-148 wrote:Zagvozd (HR) http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187266" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
resting area on A1 : 43.321213,17.167296an-148 wrote:Vrgorac (HR) http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187265" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
location: 43.203111,17.379813an-148 wrote:wrong location for that bill: http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=112868552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;an-148 wrote:Vrpolje (HR) (http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187269" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
exact location of the resting area on A1 (odmoriste): 43.691149,16.03858
Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
- an-148
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 4596
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
- Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
don't forget those ones
thanks a lot
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- an-148
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 4596
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
- Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
thanks

http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
Ashido44
- Euro-Master in Training

- Posts: 987
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:09 pm
- Location: Weit weg von hier!!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Die Bündelmischer, die meisten Belgier sind, haben gar keine Ahnung, was der EBT-Geist ist
The mixers of bundles, which are most of them belgians, don't have any clue, what's the EBT spirit
Les mélangeurs de liasses, belges pour la plupart, n'ont aucune idée de ce qu'est l'esprit EBT
De Bundelsmixers, die meeste Belgen zijn, hebben geen idee wat de EBT-geest is
The mixers of bundles, which are most of them belgians, don't have any clue, what's the EBT spirit
Les mélangeurs de liasses, belges pour la plupart, n'ont aucune idée de ce qu'est l'esprit EBT
De Bundelsmixers, die meeste Belgen zijn, hebben geen idee wat de EBT-geest is
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Can somebody fix this.genkie wrote:Bom Jesus do Monte is a city in the Municipality Braga.
- bzajc
- Euro-Expert in Training

- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:34 pm
- Location: Velenje, Slovenia
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
A little reminder.
bzajc wrote:Achadas da Cruzhas coordinates 32.841111, -17.21. It is in the municipality of Porto Moniz
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Is it possible to make a new city-profile for this village
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113496578" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ?
This village, Voort, is not a part of Heusden-Zolder, but it's a part of Borgloon.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voort_(Borgloon" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
This village, Voort, is not a part of Heusden-Zolder, but it's a part of Borgloon.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voort_(Borgloon" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
-
hladno_pivo
- Euro-Newbie

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:55 am
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I noticed some errors regarding the municipality of Bohinj (Slovenia). I will list them beginning with the ones easiest to fix.
1. Two city profiles for the same thing:
Srednja vas --> Srednja vas v Bohinju, postal 4267
e.g. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=110900326
Some famous Bohinj mountain or alpine pastures (planine) should be merged with the correct profiles of the villages in the valley bellow. However, the GPS is not the same for villages and the pastures (GPS for "Note Report" only; not meant for "City profile").
1. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113178187 Planina pri jezeru (1453 m) --> Stara Fužina (postal 4265). (GPS: 46,30968°N / 13,82758°E)
2. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716550 Planina Konjščica (1438 m) --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (postal 4267) (GPS: 46,3488°N / 13,89645°E)
3. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716359 Pokljuka Rudno polje --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (4267) (GPS: 46,3458°N / 13,9236°E)
I found one misspelled name shown at the city profile for:
1. Ribičev Laz --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
Most complex error, there are several cities summarised in the same profile:
1. "Bohinjsko jezero". It is the name of the Bohinj lake where three settelments are found: Ribčev laz, Stara Fužina and Ukanc. To add to confusion also the post office is named "Bohinjsko jezero". There is no such city / village with this name. Post office is in the city Ribčev laz so I suggest:
Bohinjsko jezero --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
2. As far as I am aware, if somebody wrote "Bohinj" , which is a municipality with close to 20 cities / villages, it was automatically assumed that this was an unexisting city "Bohinjsko jezero". I recommend a solution, which is to assign the postals to one of the three cities in the area 4264 (Bohinjska Bistrica), 4265 (Ribčev laz) and 4267 (Srednja vas v Bohinju).
I think this is it for now. But there are still over ten different settelments in Bohinj, that have not yet been visited by any of the EBT enthusiast.
Thanks for all the effort correcting and updating this & regards!
Edited: 14.8.2012
1. Two city profiles for the same thing:
Srednja vas --> Srednja vas v Bohinju, postal 4267
e.g. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=110900326
Some famous Bohinj mountain or alpine pastures (planine) should be merged with the correct profiles of the villages in the valley bellow. However, the GPS is not the same for villages and the pastures (GPS for "Note Report" only; not meant for "City profile").
1. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113178187 Planina pri jezeru (1453 m) --> Stara Fužina (postal 4265). (GPS: 46,30968°N / 13,82758°E)
2. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716550 Planina Konjščica (1438 m) --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (postal 4267) (GPS: 46,3488°N / 13,89645°E)
3. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716359 Pokljuka Rudno polje --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (4267) (GPS: 46,3458°N / 13,9236°E)
I found one misspelled name shown at the city profile for:
1. Ribičev Laz --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
Most complex error, there are several cities summarised in the same profile:
1. "Bohinjsko jezero". It is the name of the Bohinj lake where three settelments are found: Ribčev laz, Stara Fužina and Ukanc. To add to confusion also the post office is named "Bohinjsko jezero". There is no such city / village with this name. Post office is in the city Ribčev laz so I suggest:
Bohinjsko jezero --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
2. As far as I am aware, if somebody wrote "Bohinj" , which is a municipality with close to 20 cities / villages, it was automatically assumed that this was an unexisting city "Bohinjsko jezero". I recommend a solution, which is to assign the postals to one of the three cities in the area 4264 (Bohinjska Bistrica), 4265 (Ribčev laz) and 4267 (Srednja vas v Bohinju).
I think this is it for now. But there are still over ten different settelments in Bohinj, that have not yet been visited by any of the EBT enthusiast.
Thanks for all the effort correcting and updating this & regards!
Edited: 14.8.2012
Last edited by hladno_pivo on Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- an-148
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 4596
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
- Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Montenau 4770, coordinates: 50.35881,6.122943
first bill entered: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113885910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(beware of the false spelling of wally2cv: there is no "e" after the "n")
first bill entered: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113885910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(beware of the false spelling of wally2cv: there is no "e" after the "n")
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- an-148
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 4596
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
- Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
new location in Montenegro: Baošići https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187968" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Baošići 85344, municipality Herceg Novi
coordinates: 42.442461,18.626618
Baošići 85344, municipality Herceg Novi
coordinates: 42.442461,18.626618
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Some good points. I'm not a plotter, so can't help you directly. But as I also like to have such things worked out correctly and consequently, maybe a few remarks can help to settle this correctly.hladno_pivo wrote:I noticed some errors regarding the municipality of Bohinj (Slovenia).
Afaik, you should give the name of the "city" (settlement) in the location and give any "city-quarters" (parts of settlement) into the comment if desired. Respective locations are then defined as combinations of settlement+postalcode. But in Slovenia this leads in most cases to 1 coordinate as settlements generally have 1 postalcode only.hladno_pivo wrote: Some famous Bohinj mountain or alpine pastures (planine) should be merged with the correct profiles of the villages in the valley bellow. However, the GPS is not the same for villages and the pastures.
1. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113178187 Planina pri jezeru (1453 m) --> Stara Fužina (postal 4265). (GPS: 46,30968°N / 13,82758°E)
2. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716550 Planina Konjščica (1438 m) --> Srednja vas (postal 4267) (GPS: 46,3488°N / 13,89645°E)
3. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716359 Pokljuka Rudno polje --> Bohinjska Bistrica (4264) (GPS: 46,3458°N / 13,9236°E)
None of the three seems to be an official settlement (naselje), so they should be merged into the profiles of the cities on which territories they are without coordinate assigned. (that is: they will get the average coordinate).
By the way: Rudno polje seems to be part of Srednja vas v Bohinju and to have postalcode 4267 (see e.g.: http://www.center-pokljuka.si/sl/poklju ... ljuki.html
Indeed, the "i" is too much, but do you have a source for the non-capital "l"? Both Geopedia as the municipality of Bohinj give it with a capital "L"hladno_pivo wrote:I found one misspelled name shown at the city profile for (also mind the capital letters):
1. Ribičev Laz --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
Yes, those are difficult cases. I would say the location of the post office doesn't really matter. My suggestion would be to unassign these notes at all as they refer to a non-exisiting town, but merely to a region and you cannot be reasonably sure which of the places they were received. However I don't know what the official procedure is in this.hladno_pivo wrote: Most complex error, there are several cities summarised in the same profile:
1. "Bohinjsko jezero". It is the name of the Bohinj lake where three settelments are found: Ribčev laz, Stara Fužina and Ukanc. To add to confusion also the post office is named "Bohinjsko jezero". There is no such city / village with this name. Post office is in the city Ribčev laz so I suggest:
Bohinjsko jezero --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
2. As far as I am aware, if somebody wrote "Bohinj" , which is a municipality with close to 20 cities / villages, it was automatically assumed that this was an unexisting city "Bohinjsko jezero". I recommend a solution, which is to assign the postals to one of the three cities in the area 4264 (Bohinjska Bistrica), 4265 (Ribčev laz) and 4267 (Srednja vas v Bohinju).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
One more case of the "Bohinjsko jezero" type: Zelenica
This is a valley (popular for skiing), not a settlement. Interesting here is that the note could have been received at the lower part (which is part of Podlubelj, municipality Tržič) or at the upper part (which is part of Doslovče, mun. Žirovnica).
This is a valley (popular for skiing), not a settlement. Interesting here is that the note could have been received at the lower part (which is part of Podlubelj, municipality Tržič) or at the upper part (which is part of Doslovče, mun. Žirovnica).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Jyväskylän maalaiskunta (Rural municipality of Jyväskylä) ceased to exist on January 1, 2009, when it was merged with the city of Jyväskylä. Please, merge the city profiles into a "new" Jyväskylä.
"Olemme kosmisia kukkakaaleja ajan ja olevaisen virrassa..."
"Klip klop - hevonen on pop, kun lasagneen sitä laittaa"
Hullulla on halvat huvit
"Klip klop - hevonen on pop, kun lasagneen sitä laittaa"
Hullulla on halvat huvit
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I have find an incorrect dot for Thirimont
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... ity=179273" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This dot is for a place with the same name, but that's a part of Beaumont.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirimont" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This dot is for a place with the same name, but that's a part of Beaumont.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirimont" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Vico Equense is way off base. My bills from there are located in Croatia, while the city profile is located somewhere near Pescara. The right coördinates are 40.662, 14.427.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Elmo wrote:Vico Equense is way off base. My bills from there are located in Croatia, while the city profile is located somewhere near Pescara. The right coördinates are 40.662, 14.427.
Fixed!
Se tu passi un posto strano che si chiama Baffalù
io non ci sarò ma tu vedrai...
Elenco dei comuni italiani con il loro inauguratore/List of italian cities with their "first-note user"
io non ci sarò ma tu vedrai...
Elenco dei comuni italiani con il loro inauguratore/List of italian cities with their "first-note user"
