Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

don't forget those ones :wink: :wink: thanks a lot
an-148 wrote:little reminder :wink:
an-148 wrote:Zagvozd (HR) http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187266" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
resting area on A1 : 43.321213,17.167296
an-148 wrote:Vrgorac (HR) http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187265" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
location: 43.203111,17.379813
an-148 wrote:
an-148 wrote:Vrpolje (HR) (http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187269" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
exact location of the resting area on A1 (odmoriste): 43.691149,16.03858
wrong location for that bill: http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=112868552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

thanks :wink: :wink:
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ashido44
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 987
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:09 pm
Location: Weit weg von hier!!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Ashido44 »

Habay-la-Neuve and Habay are the same city.

Habay-la-Neuve is the full name.
Die Bündelmischer, die meisten Belgier sind, haben gar keine Ahnung, was der EBT-Geist ist
The mixers of bundles, which are most of them belgians, don't have any clue, what's the EBT spirit
Les mélangeurs de liasses, belges pour la plupart, n'ont aucune idée de ce qu'est l'esprit EBT
De Bundelsmixers, die meeste Belgen zijn, hebben geen idee wat de EBT-geest is
genkie
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:00 pm
Location: Zutendaal, Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by genkie »

genkie wrote:Bom Jesus do Monte is a city in the Municipality Braga.
Can somebody fix this.
User avatar
bzajc
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:34 pm
Location: Velenje, Slovenia
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by bzajc »

A little reminder.
bzajc wrote:Achadas da Cruz :flag-pt: has coordinates 32.841111, -17.21. It is in the municipality of Porto Moniz
User avatar
De Slak
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2018
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:43 pm
Location: Mechelen Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by De Slak »

Is it possible to make a new city-profile for this village :arrow: http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113496578" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ?
This village, Voort, is not a part of Heusden-Zolder, but it's a part of Borgloon.


http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voort_(Borgloon" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
hladno_pivo
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:55 am

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by hladno_pivo »

I noticed some errors regarding the municipality of Bohinj (Slovenia). I will list them beginning with the ones easiest to fix.
1. Two city profiles for the same thing:
Srednja vas --> Srednja vas v Bohinju, postal 4267
e.g. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=110900326

Some famous Bohinj mountain or alpine pastures (planine) should be merged with the correct profiles of the villages in the valley bellow. However, the GPS is not the same for villages and the pastures (GPS for "Note Report" only; not meant for "City profile").
1. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113178187 Planina pri jezeru (1453 m) --> Stara Fužina (postal 4265). (GPS: 46,30968°N / 13,82758°E)
2. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716550 Planina Konjščica (1438 m) --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (postal 4267) (GPS: 46,3488°N / 13,89645°E)
3. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716359 Pokljuka Rudno polje --> Srednja vas v Bohinju (4267) (GPS: 46,3458°N / 13,9236°E)

I found one misspelled name shown at the city profile for:
1. Ribičev Laz --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).

Most complex error, there are several cities summarised in the same profile:
1. "Bohinjsko jezero". It is the name of the Bohinj lake where three settelments are found: Ribčev laz, Stara Fužina and Ukanc. To add to confusion also the post office is named "Bohinjsko jezero". There is no such city / village with this name. Post office is in the city Ribčev laz so I suggest:
Bohinjsko jezero --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
2. As far as I am aware, if somebody wrote "Bohinj" , which is a municipality with close to 20 cities / villages, it was automatically assumed that this was an unexisting city "Bohinjsko jezero". I recommend a solution, which is to assign the postals to one of the three cities in the area 4264 (Bohinjska Bistrica), 4265 (Ribčev laz) and 4267 (Srednja vas v Bohinju).

I think this is it for now. But there are still over ten different settelments in Bohinj, that have not yet been visited by any of the EBT enthusiast. :)

Thanks for all the effort correcting and updating this & regards!

Edited: 14.8.2012
Last edited by hladno_pivo on Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

Montenau 4770, coordinates: 50.35881,6.122943
first bill entered: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113885910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(beware of the false spelling of wally2cv: there is no "e" after the "n")
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

new location in Montenegro: Baošići https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=187968" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Baošići 85344, municipality Herceg Novi
coordinates: 42.442461,18.626618
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
sarebt
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:31 am
Location: Kamnik, Slovenia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by sarebt »

hladno_pivo wrote:I noticed some errors regarding the municipality of Bohinj (Slovenia).
Some good points. I'm not a plotter, so can't help you directly. But as I also like to have such things worked out correctly and consequently, maybe a few remarks can help to settle this correctly.
hladno_pivo wrote: Some famous Bohinj mountain or alpine pastures (planine) should be merged with the correct profiles of the villages in the valley bellow. However, the GPS is not the same for villages and the pastures.
1. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113178187 Planina pri jezeru (1453 m) --> Stara Fužina (postal 4265). (GPS: 46,30968°N / 13,82758°E)
2. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716550 Planina Konjščica (1438 m) --> Srednja vas (postal 4267) (GPS: 46,3488°N / 13,89645°E)
3. https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=113716359 Pokljuka Rudno polje --> Bohinjska Bistrica (4264) (GPS: 46,3458°N / 13,9236°E)
Afaik, you should give the name of the "city" (settlement) in the location and give any "city-quarters" (parts of settlement) into the comment if desired. Respective locations are then defined as combinations of settlement+postalcode. But in Slovenia this leads in most cases to 1 coordinate as settlements generally have 1 postalcode only.
None of the three seems to be an official settlement (naselje), so they should be merged into the profiles of the cities on which territories they are without coordinate assigned. (that is: they will get the average coordinate).
By the way: Rudno polje seems to be part of Srednja vas v Bohinju and to have postalcode 4267 (see e.g.: http://www.center-pokljuka.si/sl/poklju ... ljuki.html
hladno_pivo wrote:I found one misspelled name shown at the city profile for (also mind the capital letters):
1. Ribičev Laz --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
Indeed, the "i" is too much, but do you have a source for the non-capital "l"? Both Geopedia as the municipality of Bohinj give it with a capital "L"
hladno_pivo wrote: Most complex error, there are several cities summarised in the same profile:
1. "Bohinjsko jezero". It is the name of the Bohinj lake where three settelments are found: Ribčev laz, Stara Fužina and Ukanc. To add to confusion also the post office is named "Bohinjsko jezero". There is no such city / village with this name. Post office is in the city Ribčev laz so I suggest:
Bohinjsko jezero --> Ribčev laz (postal 4265).
2. As far as I am aware, if somebody wrote "Bohinj" , which is a municipality with close to 20 cities / villages, it was automatically assumed that this was an unexisting city "Bohinjsko jezero". I recommend a solution, which is to assign the postals to one of the three cities in the area 4264 (Bohinjska Bistrica), 4265 (Ribčev laz) and 4267 (Srednja vas v Bohinju).
Yes, those are difficult cases. I would say the location of the post office doesn't really matter. My suggestion would be to unassign these notes at all as they refer to a non-exisiting town, but merely to a region and you cannot be reasonably sure which of the places they were received. However I don't know what the official procedure is in this.
sarebt
Euro-Newbie
Euro-Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:31 am
Location: Kamnik, Slovenia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by sarebt »

One more case of the "Bohinjsko jezero" type: Zelenica

This is a valley (popular for skiing), not a settlement. Interesting here is that the note could have been received at the lower part (which is part of Podlubelj, municipality Tržič) or at the upper part (which is part of Doslovče, mun. Žirovnica).
User avatar
Tarmo
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:22 am

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Tarmo »

Jyväskylän maalaiskunta (Rural municipality of Jyväskylä) ceased to exist on January 1, 2009, when it was merged with the city of Jyväskylä. Please, merge the city profiles into a "new" Jyväskylä.
"Olemme kosmisia kukkakaaleja ajan ja olevaisen virrassa..."
"Klip klop - hevonen on pop, kun lasagneen sitä laittaa" :grin:
Hullulla on halvat huvit 8O
User avatar
De Slak
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2018
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:43 pm
Location: Mechelen Belgium

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by De Slak »

I have find an incorrect dot for Thirimont :arrow: http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... ity=179273" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This dot is for a place with the same name, but that's a part of Beaumont.

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirimont" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4243
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

Vico Equense is way off base. My bills from there are located in Croatia, while the city profile is located somewhere near Pescara. The right coördinates are 40.662, 14.427.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
-flop-
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 6921
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:39 pm
Location: Piemonte

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by -flop- »

Elmo wrote:Vico Equense is way off base. My bills from there are located in Croatia, while the city profile is located somewhere near Pescara. The right coördinates are 40.662, 14.427.

Fixed! :wink:
Se tu passi un posto strano che si chiama Baffalù
io non ci sarò ma tu vedrai...


Elenco dei comuni italiani con il loro inauguratore/List of italian cities with their "first-note user"
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”