EuroBillTracker

eddydevries wrote:

lmviterbo wrote:Prices
(We'll update this as soon as possible:)

Hmmmmm,

The meeting is already over for a few days, but no update yet........

Hahaha, thanks for the reminder. We will update that post sometime before Summer Meeting. Of course, you can update it yourself, too.

One answer was just behind my head. Rest of the meeting we forgot to look for answers as we didn't have change to win as we did participate only few events (+Cabo do Roca on our own, but didn't knew question so early). So, we can fill the form, if you think there is a change to win with one point Or... we can fill one form with that only one right question and another with one right and try if we win in lottery by quessing answers (or get -10 points or whatever)

If only 4 or 5 users answer and some of them will guess some questions (of which some are wrong), you can still win with only 1 correct answer (but I hope, I've more correct answers ).

48 hours later. Six respondents have filled the form so far. We've got everything, from all answers wrong to all answers right, from 3 to 11 questions answered, from negative points to 85% of the highest possible score. Based on this, answer if you will, the way you believe to maximize your chances.

Less than 24 hours to win at least one prize. I know who's winning

And it's still possible to win with no more than 8 correct answers and 1 wrong (or, better yet, only 8 correct answers).

http://goo.gl/n61riK

And the winners are:

Grand Prize	170 notes —	Math Murderer
2nd Prize	080 notes —	eddydevries
3rd Prize	0 —	mico
3rd Prize	040 notes —	Juristi M

The 3rd prize had to be decided by the tiebreaker question, and it was a close call!

We still don't know who gets the hit note(s). We're now sending the three files to avij, so that he can decide on what to do (send them to the winners or registering the notes himself on their behalf).

Tomorrow, we will publish the correct answers and some stats.

EDIT (28 March): After having thought and debated with dalaise, mico has declared that, in spite of hoping that this game will become a standard feature in future meetings, they wouldn't want to accept the prize due to a personal strict rule they've been following since they started tracking six years ago ("you shouldn't enter a note if you know in advance that there is a 0,01% possibility it has already been entered by someone else"). So, mico stated they would "be happier if the competitor who finished in fourth place will enter" the prize. After that, the 3rd Prize (40 notes) has gone to Juristi M, who gladly accepted it.

Congratulations to the winners

lmviterbo wrote:We're now sending the three files to avij, so that he can decide on what to do (send them to the winners or registering the notes himself on their behalf).

Congratulations to the winners I think you can just PM the data to the winners, I don't need to be involved in this.

avij wrote:I think you can just PM the data to the winners, I don't need to be involved in this.

Oh, OK! (I have already sent you the file, so please delete it. I'll send PMs to the winners then.)

Congrats to the 3 winners and to the organisers for such a good idea.

All prize files sent. Dear winners, check your Inboxes!

And register those notes, folks! I'm looking forward to knowing who got the hit(s)!

Thank you !!!! (for the prize and for the congratulations)

'unfortunately' no "extra prize" for me (I mean: no hit;) ) .

Congratulations to the winners!

Is it possible to publish the correct answers here?

...and the detailed classification , please ?

Sorry for the delay. I'll publish the answers as soon as a minor predicament is cleared.

With the correct answers, everyone can do their own maths and know what was their score. So I will not publish the detailed classification, since someone might prefer their score to be kept private.

EDIT: I had written contrivance instead of predicament. I don't know how my brain picked the former word instead of the latter. Nor do I know how my brain suddenly got it two hours later.