Page 74 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:13 pm
by ravestorm
doctorwho wrote:A few days ago, I noticed that when I enter the city Santa Venera (in Malta) using the usual abbreviation Sta Venera, the website thinks it is a separate city. Perhaps this could be fixed in future.
Thanks in advance!
doctorwho
This kind of problems are solved manually by coordinates volunteers.
Sta Venera is now subsumed to Santa Venera profile, so if you'll continue to enter notes using Sta Venera you won't have two distinct locations anymore.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:36 pm
by doctorwho
ravestorm wrote:doctorwho wrote:A few days ago, I noticed that when I enter the city Santa Venera (in Malta) using the usual abbreviation Sta Venera, the website thinks it is a separate city. Perhaps this could be fixed in future.
Thanks in advance!
doctorwho
This kind of problems are solved manually by coordinates volunteers.
Sta Venera is now subsumed to Santa Venera profile, so if you'll continue to enter notes using Sta Venera you won't have two distinct locations anymore.
oh i c..
Thanks!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:49 am
by Yelverdack
A dot on the map is still missing for this french city
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=3916
Thanks in advance
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:20 pm
by Quizmaster
La Hoya hasn't yet got a dot on the map. It's La Hoya in the Murcia province, halfway between Lorca and Totana along the Autovía del Mediterraneo.
And please correct the name of
La rabita. It should be La Rábita
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 10:51 pm
by knospe
// Bérat (ID 142178)

split in Bérat (France) and Berat (Albania)
// Gelenkirchen (ID 146743)

Gelsenkirchen (ID 30975)
// Maria Bildhausen (ID 58565)

Münnerstadt (ID 60164)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:03 pm
by knospe
// Ljubljana- Center (ID 146848), Vevče (ID 126510), Ljubljana-Polje (ID 126563), Sostro (ID 127979)

Ljubljana (ID 55755)
Only if Slovenian useres agree!!! (
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljubljana# ... _Ljubljana)
// Bad Ischll (ID 146846)

Bad Ischl (ID 6665)
Id-Dwejra (ID 146844)

Binja Ġebel id-Dwejra

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:46 pm
by knospe
// Duino Aurisina - Devin (ID 146866)

Duino-Aurisina / Devin-Nabrežina (ID 23003)
// Sale san giovanni (ID 85670)

Sale San Giovanni
// San giovanni a piro (ID 86137)

San Giovanni a Piro
// San giovanni lipioni (ID 86141)

San Giovanni Lipioni
// Boogaarden (ID 12079)

Bogaarden (ID 11664)
// Annawerk (ID 3661)

Annaberg (ID 142038) there is no AnnaWERK with this zip code
// Einoedhausen (ID 24247), Einodhausen (ID 24243)

Einödhausen (ID 24202)
// Doerrensolz (ID 21877), Dorrensolz (ID 22313)

Dörrensolz (ID 20332)
// Dreissigacker (ID 22586)

Dreißigacker (ID 22547)
// Buecheloh (ID 14573)

Bücheloh (ID 8186)
// Farnbach (ID 26789)

Fambach (ID 26746) there is no FaRNbach with this zip code
// Giessuebel (ID 31576), Giessübel (ID 31567):arrow: Schleusegrund (ID 89389) (
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gie%C3%9F%C3%BCbel)
// Billbrook (ID 10638), Eimsbüttel (ID 24192), Eppendorf (ID 25458) [only zip codes with 2xxxx]

Hamburg (ID 36240)
// Haale-Nienrade (ID 35470)

Haale (ID 35469)
// Biersdorf-am-See (ID 146921)

Biersdorf am See (ID 10545)
Villa San Giovanni (ID 109696)

Villa San Giovanni (PE) [zip code 65020] and Villa San Giovanni (CH) [zip code 66010]
Villa San Giovanni (ID 139982)

Villa San Giovanni (BO)
Villa San Giovanni (ID 101402)

Villa San Giovanni (RC)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:28 pm
by R/J
I think
this city should be merged with
this one.
The first one has only bills by one (inactive) user and the name looks like a nickname for the true name of the place.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:50 pm
by yli
R/J wrote:I think
this city should be merged with
this one.
The first one has only bills by one (inactive) user and the name looks like a nickname for the true name of the place.
I dissagree. Looking at the postalcode of the
hit with
Dommelvalley (5627) I think it should be merged with
Eindhoven (postalcodes 5600 to 5658).
Dommelvalley isn't a propername - not even a nickname for Eindhoven. But the river Dommel is going to this town.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:54 am
by R/J
yli wrote:R/J wrote:I think
this city should be merged with
this one.
The first one has only bills by one (inactive) user and the name looks like a nickname for the true name of the place.
I dissagree. Looking at the postalcode of the
hit with
Dommelvalley (5627) I think it should be merged with
Eindhoven (postalcodes 5600 to 5658).
Dommelvalley isn't a propername - not even a nickname for Eindhoven. But the river Dommel is going to this town.
You're right, I didn't look far enough, I just knew Dommelvalley is not an existing place name.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:06 pm
by knospe
// Leipzig Flughafen (ID 147028)

Flughafen Leipzig/Halle (ID 28075)
// Gornji macelj (ID 32547)

Gornji Macelj
Baths of Afrodite (ID 142515)

Baths of Aphrodite
// Vir (ID 124391)

split in
Vir (Slovenia) and
Vir (Croatia) (
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vir_(Kroatien))
and btw: there are also
*
Vir (Serbia)
*
Vir (Mazedonia)
*
Vir (Bosnia-Herzegowina) (43.521389,17.213056)
*and a
Vír in Czech (49.558333,16.315556)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vir
what's up with the Country profile of
Hong Kong should all cities be merged into
Hong Kong and the country be deleted or how are we going to aproche this (Hong Kong as independend country doesn't exist since 1999, I think, so no one could have entered bills there anyway)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:39 pm
by bhoeyb
knospe wrote:Baths of Afrodite (ID 142515)

Baths of Aphrodite
Go and have a look at that place yourself and see the signs along the road there:
Baths of Afrodite - like I did

.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:44 pm
by knospe
bhoeyb wrote:knospe wrote:Baths of Afrodite (ID 142515)

Baths of Aphrodite
Go and have a look at that place yourself and see the signs along the road there:
Baths of Afrodite - like I did

.
May be. The english dictionary tells an other story. And since the official name would be greek or turkish anyway, I'd guess they ment to write it in English for the tourists and made a little typo. And
Baths and
of are english words ... so I thourght
Aphrodite should be, too. No

Ok

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:48 pm
by bhoeyb
knospe wrote:bhoeyb wrote:knospe wrote:Baths of Afrodite (ID 142515)

Baths of Aphrodite
Go and have a look at that place yourself and see the signs along the road there:
Baths of Afrodite - like I did

.
May be. The english dictionary tells an other story. And since
Baths and
of are english words ... I'd guess they ment to write it in English

You don't have to guess ... you have to
be sure if you want to make changes. This is just making EBT less correct

.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:52 pm
by knospe
bhoeyb wrote:You don't have to guess ... you have to
be sure if you want to make changes. This is just making EBT less correct

.
This is why I
didn't change anything and
posted it in the forum. So we (maybe not you and I, 'cause I get the feeling I pissed you off by posting something about Belgium before) can talk about it.
And for my motives: Even if all signs in China would say "Chek Lap Kok - Hong Kong Internatio
nl Airport" or some other kind of typo,
I'd (and that's just me) prefer it to be "Chek Lap Kok - Hong Kong Internatio
nal Airport" in EBT, if we want to write it in English. That's my point of view.