EuroBillTracker

Hits with note registered in the same day are automatically moderated.

okay
it's a little bit weird
and sad (for an area without many hits )

I think that the most of these hits are friendly.

Just for example:

2010-06-12 09:48:10 Lisboa - Aveiro bioj - pessp 216Km 2 days
2010-06-01 17:07:47 Loulé - Quarteira pessp - bioj 5Km 1 day
2010-01-08 09:44:20 Aveiro - Porto pessp - bioj 57Km 2 days
2009-02-22 21:19:34 Lavre - Aveiro bioj - pessp 204Km 1 day

Please moderate this hit: http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=81410756" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I cannot believe that this note, which I just received as a pristine, uncirculated copy, was first received in a Taiwanese restaurant in 2008 !

ye olde

ye olde wrote:Please moderate this hit: http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=81410756" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I cannot believe that this note, which I just received as a pristine, uncirculated copy, was first received in a Taiwanese restaurant in 2008 !

ye olde

Please simply do not register the bills you get from Guy Sohier as most of them do come from EBTers...

It's a bit "boring" to moderate hits generated by bill collectors...

Phaseolus wrote: Please simply do not register the bills you get from Guy Sohier as most of them do come from EBTers...
It's a bit "boring" to moderate hits generated by bill collectors...

All right, I will adhere to it.

Nevertheless, have you ever received a really uncirculated bill in a restaurant, a bill, which is still UNC after two years ?

ye olde

7.92x57 is a good user from Paris. There were never issues with him.
Restaurants have to get their money too from the bank. There is also the chance that they receive uncirculated bills. When you as a customer from the restaurant receive such a bill it still looks uncirculated and has passed hands only once.

Please stop insinuating users without hard evidence.

ye olde wrote:

Phaseolus wrote: Please simply do not register the bills you get from Guy Sohier as most of them do come from EBTers...

It's a bit "boring" to moderate hits generated by bill collectors...

All right, I will adhere to it.

Nevertheless, I would call the original entry of Taiwanese restaurant bill a fake - because I have this bill in my hands in as already mentioned pristine condition. Have you ever received a real uncirculated bill in a restaurant ?

ye olde

I know 7,92*57 personnaly and I have eaten several times with him in this Taiwanese restaurant (ZenZoo..), that is very nice...

Such criticism coming from someone that cumulates fake hits by exchanging bills with other collectors, is a shame....

such as :

2010-06-14 18:30:01 Saint louis - Reims Joc - ye olde 319 1053
+ 2010-06-14 18:30:01 Paris - Reims 7.92x57 - ye olde 129 556
+ 2010-04-08 12:13:18 Wunstorf - Madrid ye olde - Royal King 1663 949
+ 2010-01-04 18:30:24 Reims - Reims g.s.51 - ye olde 0 943
+ 2009-12-10 22:10:29 Barakaldo - Rechtenbach Royal King - ye olde 1204 603
+ 2009-11-22 10:32:53 Dalkey, Co. Dublin - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 1042 5
+ 2009-11-20 09:03:17 Steinhude - Wunstorf ye olde - japh 4 3
+ 2009-07-21 14:44:11 Wunstorf - Faetano ye olde - old_man 971 560
+ 2009-05-28 12:36:09 Rechtenbach - Rechtenbach ye olde - Royal King 0 345
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 La Spezia - Wunstorf giulcenc&family - ye olde 924 784
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 Lerici - Wunstorf giulcenc&family - ye olde 928 707
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 Ljubljana - Wunstorf Dioniz - ye olde 797 226
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 Ljubljana - Wunstorf Dioniz - ye olde 797 207
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 Ljubljana - Wunstorf Dioniz - ye olde 797 158
+ 2009-05-05 23:27:16 Ljubljana - Wunstorf Dioniz - ye olde 797 100
+ 2008-10-13 19:59:21 Hanau - Bilzen ye olde - romeotango 253 373
+ 2008-10-08 16:29:50 Hanau - Bilzen ye olde - romeotango 253 367
+ 2008-08-23 15:18:45 Hannover - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 22 2
+ 2008-08-23 15:14:48 Hannover - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 22 2
+ 2008-08-09 23:19:51 Saint-Louis - Reims Joc - ye olde 319 24
+ 2008-08-02 20:14:03 Sandyford - Markdorf ye olde - lordna 1259 2
+ 2008-07-16 22:32:51 Wien-Alsergrund - Reims CobbDouglas - ye olde 909 27
+ 2008-07-16 22:32:51 Wien-Alsergrund - Reims CobbDouglas - ye olde 909 27
+ 2008-06-17 00:04:53 Reims - Rechtenbach g.s.51 - ye olde 402 376
+ 2008-06-17 00:04:07 Chagny - Rechtenbach Ceric - ye olde 488 59
+ 2008-06-17 00:02:22 Irmo - Rechtenbach Royal King - ye olde 7211 67
+ 2008-06-17 00:01:20 Rechtenbach - Rechtenbach Royal King - ye olde 0 30
+ 2008-04-22 19:09:19 Chagny - Reims Ceric - ye olde 265 3
+ 2008-03-19 10:21:16 Hannover - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 22 34
+ 2008-02-19 18:44:57 Caen - Reims porridge - ye olde 317 481
+ 2008-02-18 10:32:18 Hannover - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 22 4
+ 2008-01-07 19:58:46 Günzburg - Wunstorf lordna - ye olde 446 481
+ 2008-01-07 19:57:15 Markdorf - Wunstorf lordna - ye olde 523 576
+ 2008-01-07 19:57:15 Unterwössen - Wunstorf lordna - ye olde 564 481
+ 2008-01-06 18:16:03 Poing - Wunstorf lordna - ye olde 502 504
+ 2007-12-15 10:49:48 Wunstorf - Wunstorf ye olde - Royal King 0 78
+ 2007-11-06 18:53:44 Lugano - Cassarate - Nürnberg Royal King - ye olde 414 2
+ 2007-10-23 22:40:05 München - Paris - Wunstorf

BaliBennie wrote:Please stop insinuating users without hard evidence.

ye olde has an evidence, because he has NOW an UNC note in his hand!

But please consider ALL, that in such cases, the reason could be also just an typo in the serial number made by the first user!

I for myself had eg a hit into consecutive series with brandnew notes (the hit note is still in my possession!), where the first user must made an error.

So please, calm down everybody

ErGo wrote:

BaliBennie wrote:Please stop insinuating users without hard evidence.

ye olde has an evidence, because he has NOW an UNC note in his hand!

But please consider ALL, that in such cases, the reason could be also just an typo in the serial number made by the first user!

I for myself had eg a hit into consecutive series with brandnew notes (the hit note is still in my possession!), where the first user must made an error.

So please, calm down everybody

I am calm.

Just pointing out that getting a pristine bill is not always really UNC. It could be that it has passed once since getting it from a bank.
A type is also possible.

But accusing someone of being a faker is a step too far in this case.

edit: Thanks for editing the message and taking back saying he is a faker.

Humble apologies: I do not call 7,92*57 a fake. Insult was not intended on my side .

By the way Phaesolus, thanks for the long list of my moderated hits ! Quite interesting. How can I obtain such data, because thre are quite a few examples, I had no information about.

Furthermore, nice to show the list, but take for example the cases of Dioniz as well as giulcenc&family, did I not myself ask for moderation, long before you moderated, because I made a mistake ?

and furthermore, please do not blame me for passive hits, I have no way of avoiding those, or do you know the secret, of how to do that ?

Those of you, who know me (not personally, but via EBT) will hopefully agree, that I have never tried to fake or insinuate faking - far from it. I am only interested in the numbers for my statistics and in nice UNC notes for my collection.

Apologies accepted ?

And again Galinhas and galinhas2: hit

2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx (*) Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:01:59 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)

trinacria wrote:2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx (*) Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)
2010-07-15 16:02:44 5 EURUxxxx6452xxx Lxxxxx Graz-Lend ( Flag for Austria Austria, 8020)

this should probably be over in "suspicious notes..."

I have photographed the note in question and the surrounding notes, as they are from a bundle of brandnew L027I2

Judging from the short code my "hitpartner" entered (L012D2, which doesn't fit at all with the serial number except for the L) this was either a mistake or faking on his part. (And the link to the - now moderated - hit is: http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82727921" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)

Is it possible to moderate this friendly hit: http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=82913476 ??

Is the only hit to moderate caused by the spanish EBT meeting in Logroño last weekend.

I tried to create a support request, but I don't know the full serial of the note....

Thanks