Page 9 of 22
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:43 pm
by trezay
Désolé, j'ai 2-3 semaines de retard sur la
mise à jour annoncée

Grâce à lmviterbo, nous avons deux nouveaux participants, bhoeyb et Mil€s66, qui prennent directement des places de choix dans les classements. Deux autres participants (laurentina et moi-même) ont des mises à jour mineures, sans changer de place dans les classements. 72% des participants ont un score supérieur à 50%. L'amas moyen compte 527 dots
(+77), et représente un pourcentage moyen de 65,40%
(-0,21%).
Sorry, I'm 2 or 3 weeks late with the
update I promised you

Thanks to lmviterbo, two new players, bhoeyb and Mil€s66, joined us and immediately rose to good spots in both rankings. Two other players (laurentina and myself) made minor updates, without moving in the rankings. 72% of the players scored above 50%. The average cluster has 527 dots
(+77), and equals an average score of 65,40%
(-0,21%).
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2018 8:59 pm
by trezay
J'ai fait la mise à jour générale et j'ai oublié de mettre mon propre score à jour
Ce sera pour la prochaine fois …
Score en nombre absolu de dots :
560
Score en pourcentage : 560/625x100 =
89,60%
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:06 am
by lmviterbo
Points consécutifs d'Elmo:
933 (d'un total de
1529).
Alors,

Elmo
933

Elmo
61,02%
Quelques autres faciles à compter:
Moise: 330/509 = 64,83%
H.i.n.t.i: 291/436 = 66,74%
zimmerge: 83/109 = 76,15%
#deletefakebook: 84/129 = 65,12%
avij: 90/249 = 36,14%
Kraan: 296/468 = 63,25%
BGO: 261/264 = 98,86%
Math Murderer: 310/530 = 58,49%
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:22 am
by laurentina
MAJ
1054/676 = 64.14%
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:36 pm
by the_pooh_tripper
Je commence à jouer
De Haguenau à Aoste, de Bourg-en-Bresse à Bormio = 80 dots
Pourcentage: 80/275 = 29.09%
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 5:07 pm
by trezay
Cette fois-ci, nous avons une grosse
mise à jour ! Nous accueillons The_pooh_tripper, et (grâce à lmviterbo) neuf autres participants

Quelques remarques en vrac : BGO se place à la tête du second classement, avec un score de 98,86% (il ne lui manque que trois dots à rattacher à son amas principal). On signalera aussi que sept personnes (soit un quart des participants) ont un score entre 250 et 350 points au premier classement, et que 10 personnes (plus du tiers des participants) ont entre 60% et 70% au second classement

Du coup, avec des écarts moins larges entre eux, ces joueurs devraient pouvoir gagner des places plus facilement

Les trois quarts des participants ont un score supérieur à 50%. L'amas moyen compte 438 dots
(-89), et représente un pourcentage moyen de 64,18%
(-1,22%).
This time, we have a big
update! Let's welcome The_pooh_tripper and (thanks to lmviterbo) nine other players

A few random comments: BGO takes the first place in the second ranking, with 98.86% (he only needs to link three more dots to his main cluster). I'll also point out that seven people (one fourth of the players) have 250 to 350 points in the first ranking, and ten people (over a third of the players) scored 60% to 70% in the second ranking

Since the gaps between these players have shrunk, it should be easier for them to progress in the rankings

Three quarters of the players scored above 50%. The average cluster has 438 dots
(-89), and equals an average score of 64,18%
(-1,22%).
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 7:35 pm
by Kleman
Il faut que j'essaye de trouver d'autres dots

Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 10:49 pm
by aloxe
Kleman wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:35 pm
Il faut que j'essaye de trouver d'autres dots
dans la mer ?

Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 11:06 pm
by aloxe
avec tout ça j'ai oublié ma mise à jour…
Score en nombre absolu de dots : 141
Score en pourcentage : 141/348x100 = 40,52%
Je progresse sur les deux mais pas très vite.
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 3:57 am
by Kleman
aloxe wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 10:49 pm
Kleman wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 7:35 pm
Il faut que j'essaye de trouver d'autres dots
dans la mer ?
Par exemple, à l'ouest il me reste quelques iles

Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 9:30 pm
by GWR7007
First post. Hope I did it correct
101 consecutive dots
Percentage: 101/177 = 57,06% (rounded)
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 12:58 am
by lmviterbo
GWR7007 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 9:30 pm101 consecutive dots
Percentage: 101/177 = 57,06% (rounded)
I only count
100.
And that is if we count Bielefeld, a town that doesn't exist as everybody knows.
So 100/177 = 56,50%
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 2:22 am
by trezay
GWR7007 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 9:30 pm
101 consecutive dots
So many red dots
lmviterbo wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 12:58 amI only count
100.
And that is if we count Bielefeld, a town that doesn't exist as everybody knows.
Sorry, but would you mind checking again? I counted three times and I also see 101.
Also, I think the dot exists even though the city doesn't

After all, there are also real cities in the area…
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 2:50 am
by lmviterbo
trezay wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 2:22 amSorry, but would you mind checking again? I counted three times and I also see 101.
Also, I think the dot exists even though the city doesn't

After all, there are also real cities in the area…

Oops, you're absolutely right. I had counted twice, not that well as it happens… Sorry for the mess.
You're also right about the other real cities, I hadn't think of that. Now I wonder if there might be some town where Bielefeld is supposed to be! That would be crazy.
Re: Densité de votre dotmap
Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:50 am
by trezay
lmviterbo wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 2:50 amSorry for the mess.
No problem, it's really easy to make mistakes when counting dots "manually"
lmviterbo wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 2:50 amNow I wonder if there might be some town where Bielefeld is supposed to be! That would be crazy.
Let's stay realistic, shall we? That's something that would only happen in movies
