Page 96 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:06 pm
by eddydevries
To be more precize (according to Google Earth):
The coordinates of this village are:
East 4.4208766; North 51.98531250000001
And those of anothe village (
't Woudt) are:
East 4.2936288; North 51.9955136
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:30 am
by Crossmaster
Gattenhofen is a part of the commune
Steinsfeld (profile doesn´t exist yet)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:53 am
by Juud
This is an old one. Few years ago I've inserted bills in Içmeler(48720), Turkey. Içmeler is about 5 km from Marmaris (48700). So,
this dot is wrong... And
this also doesn't make sence. The dot should appear about
here
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:53 pm
by Crazy Bob
Scheveningen is part of the city of
Den Haag. See
here (English) and
here (in Dutch).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:34 pm
by LonaPo
Missing dot for
Zgornja Korena
Coordinates 46° 31′ 14.21″ N, 15° 46′ 44.97″ E
Decimal 46.520614, 15.779158
Thank you
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:06 pm
by yli
There is something wrong with the cityprofile of
Boxberg/Oberlausitz
You entered
3 notes from this city.
First appearance on EBT:
0000-00-00 (I entered on
2007-09-10)
Users who entered notes from this city: 1
Notes entered in Boxberg/Oberlausitz:
0
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:49 pm
by GP
13 months ago I already sayd that. Look to this post:
http://www.eurobilltrackerforum.com/vie ... en#p532045
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:27 pm
by de*lerger
The name
Seeryp (postal code 8892) is officially changed into
Striep. So these two profiles can be merged.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:22 am
by tigerpranke
Please split
Weiding (ID 112825) into
note
92557 Weiding (Landkreis Schwandorf) 
Wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weiding_(L ... chwandorf)
note
93459 Weiding (Landkreis Cham) 
Wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weiding_(Landkreis_Cham)
thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:15 am
by googlejaps
I found two entries for the same belgian village (different spelling):
Meersel-Dreef and
Meerseldreef.
The first one seems to be the right one. The profile of
Meerseldreef only has one visitor that entered 2 notes.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:58 am
by tigerpranke
Please rename
82547 Eurasburg (ID 26406) to Eurasburg (Oberbayern)

Wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasburg_(Oberbayern) and
86495 Eurasburg (ID 26407) to Eurasburg (Schwaben)

Wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasburg_(Schwaben)
When searching for "Eurasburg" it only shows 1 location whose link points to 86495 Eurasburg (ID 26407).
thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:40 pm
by Olivier.ch
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=61703601
Wrong dot.
Weissenberg (I don't have bêta letter for double "s") 88138 near by Lindau in Bayern region.
Thank you.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:18 pm
by Burdie
Testing the new feature of Visitors I came to
Rozenburg (Noord-Holland). This town did not have the new feature. Maybe because the total of notes entered in Rozenburg (Noord-Holland) is -216. Indeed it is Minus.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:01 pm
by tigerpranke
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:03 am
by yli
Please split the following cityprofiles :
Bavel
postal code 4854 is Bavel
postal code 4859 is Bavel (Alphen-Chaam)
Ulvenhout
postal codes 4850 and 4851 is Ulvenhout
postal code 4858 is Ulvenhout (Alphen-Chaam)
The
main locations are in the municipality Breda, but a small part of both villages are part of the municipality Alphen-Chaam (since 1997, after a reorganisation of the municipality border is that area)