Page 100 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 10:08 pm
by Crazy Bob
For some strange reason, the dot for Voorthuizen in this hit is located in Vleuten. Distance from Utrecht to Voorthuizen should be about 20-30 km.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:04 am
by roberdy
Klais is part of the municipality Krün.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 11:40 am
by japh
I entered 2 notes in Sandycove Co. Dublin but the map shows it in Co. Cork.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandycove
It is on the same dot as either Dalkey or Dublin.I don't know which.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:44 pm
by ravestorm
japh wrote:I entered 2 notes in Sandycove Co. Dublin but the map shows it in Co. Cork.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandycove
It is on the same dot as either Dalkey or Dublin.I don't know which.
Due you didn't enter the County code as post code someune guessed it was Sandycove Co. Cork instead of Sandycove Co. Dublin.
Fixed.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 9:01 pm
by japh
ravestorm wrote: Due you didn't enter the County code as post code someune guessed it was Sandycove Co. Cork instead of Sandycove Co. Dublin.
Fixed.
Thank you and please accept my apologies for this omission. I'll be sure to add the county code henceforth.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:58 pm
by Ewri
There seems to be no dot for Birgi (Trapani airport)

http://en.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63651393

missing dot

Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 10:18 pm
by tigerpranke
Missing dot: 82418 Höhlmühle (47.7121005 N, 11.2830542 E).

Höhlmühle is a part of the municipality of 82418 Riegsee (47.698786 N, 11.233762 E).

:arrow: Wikipedia (german): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riegsee_(Gemeinde)

another missing dot

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:04 pm
by tigerpranke
Missing dot: 84030 Piflas ( 48.555837 N, 12.169120 E).

Piflas is a part of the municipality of 84030 Ergolding.

:arrow: Wikipedia (german): http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergolding# ... gliederung

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:20 pm
by yli
Please merge :flag-be: Vorst (Laakdal) with :flag-be: Vorst-Laakdal

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:36 pm
by Zjonbelz
yli wrote:Please merge :flag-be: Vorst (Laakdal) with :flag-be: Vorst-Laakdal
Vorst (Laakdal) is a better name for the city profile :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 11:35 am
by bzajc
Žusterna is part of Koper, so merge this to this

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:25 pm
by Kleman
hi !

this city/note is in a wrong place
the real coordonates:
44° 25′ 05″ Nord
5° 37′ 03″ Est

thanks !

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:30 am
by googlejaps
I discovered some profiles that should be merged.
And I think these profiles can be safely deleted, as they are profiles without entered notes or coordinates, and cannot be found in Google Maps or are clearly a misspelled cityname: Of this profile I found the coordinates using Google Maps:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:41 am
by Yelverdack
Hello,

Missing dot for :

Plougrescant http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=155368

and

Le Drennec http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=155367

thanks a lot

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:34 pm
by Jan010
Hi,

dot for Rabat :flag-mt: is in Morocco: http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63710646

dot missing for Ghajn Tuffieha: http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63610428

regards,
Jan