Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:52 pm
Considering the immense diversity of administrative/political, customary, and postal divisions in Europe, varying from country to country and in some cases even from region to region - I doubt that a general and practicable policy could be found.
Germany seems to be the most complex case; initially a stunning 48% of all city profiles were from Germany. To some extent this high number is due to the conversion and to a habit of taking care in advance of German specialties like ä <-> ae (and not a, which could have been treated the same way as é / è / e), and the varieties of abbreviations (Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt (Main), Frankfurt a. Main, Frankfurt a.M., Frankfurt a. M. (one more blank), etc.). However, it appears that the approach of filling the location field in maximal detail is far more common in Germany than anywhere else.
Let me ask the question like this. Would the term "city" be appropriate for the place named Asemissen?
Entering as location Leopoldshöhe (Asemissen) could be interpreted in the sense that the user intends to register the note in Leopoldshöhe, but wishes to point out vehemently (if not vehemently, he'd use the comment field) that it was in Asemissen and not in the main center of Leopoldshöhe.
It is my hope that we will not need to go through a painful process like the one that lead to the naming conventions of Wikipedia which fill - just in the english version - three large webpages: page 1, page 2, page 3.
Germany seems to be the most complex case; initially a stunning 48% of all city profiles were from Germany. To some extent this high number is due to the conversion and to a habit of taking care in advance of German specialties like ä <-> ae (and not a, which could have been treated the same way as é / è / e), and the varieties of abbreviations (Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt (Main), Frankfurt a. Main, Frankfurt a.M., Frankfurt a. M. (one more blank), etc.). However, it appears that the approach of filling the location field in maximal detail is far more common in Germany than anywhere else.
Let me ask the question like this. Would the term "city" be appropriate for the place named Asemissen?
Entering as location Leopoldshöhe (Asemissen) could be interpreted in the sense that the user intends to register the note in Leopoldshöhe, but wishes to point out vehemently (if not vehemently, he'd use the comment field) that it was in Asemissen and not in the main center of Leopoldshöhe.
It is my hope that we will not need to go through a painful process like the one that lead to the naming conventions of Wikipedia which fill - just in the english version - three large webpages: page 1, page 2, page 3.
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. Oops, this country is only recognized by Turkey - so, the Turkish flag might be the best sollution