Page 102 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:19 am
by Jackgaillard
Hello
Missing dot for 76660
Londinières
Coordinates are
49°49'56.06"N 1°24'7.97"E
thanks a lot
Jack
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:16 am
by eddydevries
Because I exported my notes into Google Earth, only now I notice one of my notes is missing a dot.
Can you fix it?
This note I received at:
N 54.872513°
E 9.605311°
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:19 am
by eddydevries
Because we need to give the coordinates in decimal format, you mean: 49,8322388°N 1,4022138°E
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:56 am
by vermeer
Could this place below:
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=33797519" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
have the following coordinates: North 52.8905 and East 6.5325.
Thereby going off from the unknown city list.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:57 pm
by claudio vda
The correct name of
this village is "Cascine di Buti", not "Cascine"
(coord: 43° 43' 40" N 10° 37' 00" E)
I haven't got in this moment my digital camera, but when my parents will come home, I can post pictures of the road signs, if needed

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:47 pm
by gergapsek
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:22 pm
by doiknow
Please annex
Flörsheim / Main
to the profile of
Flörsheim am Main
as I thought the programm to understand it without human help

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:56 pm
by k'mon seven5
Hi
I tracked 3 notes in Compaccio / Compatsch
http://de.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=155778" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
which is on "Seiser Alm / Alpe di Siusi"
I think it has got the wrong dot.
The coordinates are
46°32'26" N
11°37'04" E
thx
k'mon
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:14 am
by roberdy
Haigerseelbach belongs to
Haiger !
Reminder:
roberdy wrote:Klais is part of the municipality Krün.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:30 pm
by bzajc
How can this
hit have 0 km?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:27 pm
by klapotec
bzajc wrote:How can this
hit have 0 km?
Because whoever entered the coordinates for 63
22 Portorož used wrong ones. These have now been corrected.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:07 am
by Crazy Bob
Please merge
Bussum, 1404 with
Bussum.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:19 am
by vermeer
I say that i.love.euro went to Bad Nieuweschans; this is it new name. With 2 banknotes he (she) is the first to do so. There are already 272 notes entered with its old name. What to do?
From Wiki: In 2009 the municipality changed the name from Nieuweschans, to promote the town as a spa.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:40 am
by an-148
please correct this note (I already used the possibility for editing but made a wrong manipulation):
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=64892528" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
change "Chantereine" - which is the name of the service area - in "Briis sous Forges"
thanks a lot

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:05 pm
by ravestorm
an-148 wrote:please correct this note (I already used the possibility for editing but made a wrong manipulation):
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=64892528" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
change "Chantereine" - which is the name of the service area - in "Briis sous Forges"
thanks a lot

You have to ask, for this kind of corrections, to
contact@eurobilltracker.com