Page 104 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:21 pm
by eddydevries
I know, these are a lot of changes, but they haven't carried out yet.

In this message should be changed one thing (indicated below in orange): the profile of Nieuweschans doesn't consist anymore (because the name of the village was changed, it was merged in the profile Bad Nieuwerschans. So Nieuwechans should be merged now into Bad Nieuwerschans.
googlejaps wrote:I don't know if my message is forgotten or if you didn't have time to process all the profiles. So I will re-enter this post as a small reminder:
googlejaps wrote:I discovered some profiles that should be merged.
And I think these profiles can be safely deleted, as they are profiles without entered notes or coordinates, and cannot be found in Google Maps or are clearly a misspelled cityname: Of this profile I found the coordinates using Google Maps:

Originally posted June 1st 2009

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:13 pm
by Crossmaster
Please add Burggrumbach to the profile of Unterpleichfeld

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:48 am
by Jes
First of all, I thank to all people working on this. It should be sometimes tyring.

Secondly, I introduced a new note in a location called Ubiarco (Spain) postcode 39360 and it has no dot. it seems to be a new location for EBT.
Coordinates: 43°24′42″N 4°6′5″O
Thanks in advance ;)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:25 pm
by margata
margata wrote:This notes are from the isla of Madeira:
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63572006" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63571750" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63571667" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63498677" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63498603" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://pt.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=63406135" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
All of this notes are from Ilha da Madeira, and you have changed the post code of Sao Vicente, and that was wron.
In Portugal we have two Sao Vicente, one in the Continent and one on the Ilha da Madeira.
So you need to put the original Post code.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:02 am
by Jes
Sorry for this again... I am travelling a little bit in these last days: I entered a note in another new place :oops:

Name: Igollo (Spain)
Post code: 39608
Coordinates: 43°25′36″N 3°51′19″O

Thanks in advance

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:38 pm
by eddydevries
Jes wrote:First of all, I thank to all people working on this. It should be sometimes tyring.

Secondly, I introduced a new note in a location called Ubiarco (Spain) postcode 39360 and it has no dot. it seems to be a new location for EBT.
Coordinates: 43°24′42″N 4°6′5″O
Thanks in advance ;)
Because we need to give the coordinates in decimal format, you mean: 43.4116666°N, 4.1013888°E
Jes wrote:Sorry for this again... I am travelling a little bit in these last days: I entered a note in another new place :oops:

Name: Igollo (Spain)
Post code: 39608
Coordinates: 43°25′36″N 3°51′19″O

Thanks in advance
And here, you mean: 43.42666667°N, 3.8552777°E

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:13 pm
by Infrarouge
there are still three profiles for Serbia, Montenegro and Serbia and Montenegro...

http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?country=Serbia" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... Montenegro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... Montenegro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

i guess the last one should be split sometime...

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:33 pm
by R/J
Infrarouge wrote:there are still three profiles for Serbia, Montenegro and Serbia and Montenegro...

http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?country=Serbia" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... Montenegro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://de.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... Montenegro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

i guess the last one should be split sometime...
I do not think this is a problem, as the last is no longer an option on entering new bills. Bills that were entered in the country, while it still existed, are of course valid entries for Serba and Montenegro

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:15 am
by Jes
eddydevries wrote:
Jes wrote:First of all, I thank to all people working on this. It should be sometimes tyring.

Secondly, I introduced a new note in a location called Ubiarco (Spain) postcode 39360 and it has no dot. it seems to be a new location for EBT.
Coordinates: 43°24′42″N 4°6′5″O
Thanks in advance ;)
Because we need to give the coordinates in decimal format, you mean: 43.4116666°N, 4.1013888°E
Jes wrote:Sorry for this again... I am travelling a little bit in these last days: I entered a note in another new place :oops:

Name: Igollo (Spain)
Post code: 39608
Coordinates: 43°25′36″N 3°51′19″O

Thanks in advance
And here, you mean: 43.42666667°N, 3.8552777°E
Thanks eddydevries, I will post it that way next time.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:56 pm
by R/J
He may be named in the suspicous user topic, but he definetely does not know how to spell.

T'Goy should be 't Goy. Both profiles have only one user that entered notes there.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:28 pm
by ravestorm
Thank eddy to provide us Jes new location cooordinate in decimal format.
As it has been explained tons of times EBT needs coords in decimal format so if you give us them in this way we don't need to translate them in a suitable format for EBT (so you can have your new dot faster :wink: ).

And I'd like to remark what Gauss wrote in 1st post of this topic when you entere notes from new locations:
Gauss wrote:Please wait at least 48 hours after entering a note before complaining about a missing dot (see also the FAQ).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:19 pm
by ravestorm
googlejaps wrote: a long list of location to fix
they're now fixed :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:05 am
by googlejaps
ravestorm wrote:
googlejaps wrote: a long list of location to fix
they're now fixed :wink:
Great, thanks. Glad I could help to keep EBT tidy.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:14 pm
by roberdy
Please merge:

Langweid
Langweid am Lech

Thanks! :D

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:21 am
by höpsismöppiäinen
Coordinates missing for Kalithea 7542. :roll: Please fix it.Thank you.