Page 107 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:21 pm
by klapotec
claudio vda wrote:There is a village in Italy, near Aosta, called Saint Nicolas: the only problem is that the notes insered from 11010 Saint Nicolas, Italy are registred as Saint Nicolas, Belgium. May you separate the two towns? Thanks
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=66918744" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Done.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:13 pm
by Jes
My auntie who live in
Güemes, gave me
this banknote. It seems that Güemes is a new place for EBT.
Name:
Güemes
Post code:
39191
Coordinates:
43.456111°N, -3.633333°W
Thanks again.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:06 am
by roberdy
Jes wrote:My auntie who live in
Güemes, gave me
this banknote. It seems that Güemes is a new place for EBT.
OK. It's also the first note from the municipality Bareyo.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:17 am
by Jes
Yes, Bareyo is divided into:
- Ajo (postcode 39170)
Bareyo itself (postcode 39170) and
Güemes (postcode 39191)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:19 pm
by ispero
I have a mistake with one note from the city of Nazareth in Israel. The system think that is a city with the same name in Belgium.
This is th note and the Geographical coordinates:
Nazareth:
http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=63336290
32.7006°N 35.3009°E
Thanks for all
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:16 pm
by LonaPo
Missing dot for
8321 Gabrje
Coordinates:
45° 46′ 42.01″ N, 15° 15′ 55″ E
45.778336, 15.265278
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:47 am
by maarsy
maarsy wrote:maarsy wrote:maarsy wrote:cople of small corections
merchtem
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=60834" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is now on the location 509.667 42.333 ( on the edge of town not a singel bank in the streets around it ) a beter location would be 50.95864, 4.23137 ( in the center of town surounded by all banks ( a corection of 900 meter ))
wolvertem
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=115838" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is now on the location 50.95 4.3 ( out of the town in the middle of some fields ) a beter location would be
50.95048, 4.30874 ( also in the center of town at the town hall and all banks are around that square ( a corection of 650 meters ))
ty for changing it

but is it normal there are still lines going to the old locations so for every hit i now have 2 lines
the hits now got only 1 line agen but they are back to the old ( bad ) location

this is how its looking from mi side now

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:52 pm
by ispero
ispero wrote:I have a mistake with one note from the city of Nazareth in Israel. The system think that is a city with the same name in Belgium.
This is th note and the Geographical coordinates:
Nazareth:
http://es.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=63336290
32.7006°N 35.3009°E
Thanks for all
All is correct, thanks for all
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:50 pm
by fordj
Hello
There are 2 names (2 cities) in eurobilltracker for the same city
84310 Morières-lès-Avignon
coordinates are 43° 56′ 33″ N 4° 54′ 19″ E
84310 Morières-les-Avignon with the same coordinates
There are wrong dots for:
30200 Saint-Nazaire
coordinates are 44° 11′ 55″ N 4° 37′ 32″ E
30200 Saint-Gervais
ccordinates are 44° 11′ 8″ N 4° 34′ 28″ E
There aren't dots for:
30430 Saint-Privat-de-Champclos
coordinates are 44° 17′ 9″ N 4° 21′ 31″ E
30630 Montclus
coordinates are 44° 15′ 41″ N 4° 25′ 14″ E
30200 Vénéjan
coordinates are 44° 11′ 52″ N 4° 39′ 30″ E
30630 Cornillon
coordinates are 44° 13′ 33″ N 4° 29′ 15″ E
30760 Saint-Julien-de-Peyrolas
coordinates are 44° 17′ 19″ N 4° 33′ 57″ E
Thanks a lot
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:36 pm
by Gnaeus
Hello -- I wanted to report a missing dot for a city in France -- as in this
note report
city: Gunsbach
Post Code: 68140
Coordinates: 48.0465 N, 07.1755 E
Many thanks!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:03 pm
by curioso
Hello
I have introduced the first note from
Saint-Aignan (Loir-et-Cher), post code 41110, (France)
but the dot has innacurately been mapped in the place of a different city:
Saint-Aignan (Morbihan), post code 56480, (France)
Thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:05 pm
by Gnaeus
Gnaeus wrote:Hello -- I wanted to report a missing dot for a city in France -- as in this
note report
city: Gunsbach
Post Code: 68140
Coordinates: 48.0465 N, 07.1755 E
Many thanks!
That was quick -- thank you!!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:32 pm
by roberdy
curioso wrote:I have introduced the first note from
Saint-Aignan (Loir-et-Cher), post code 41110, (France)
but the dot has innacurately been mapped in the place of a different city:
Saint-Aignan (Morbihan), post code 56480, (France)
OK, that should be fixed.
But it isn't the first note in St-Aignan...
Gnaeus wrote:That was quick -- thank you!!

You're welcome!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:51 pm
by KoKiNouxx
Hello there!
Reporting a missing dot for a
note I entered in
Zenica (72000), Bosnia-Herzegovina
Coordinates : 44.206475 N,17.908974 E
Thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:18 am
by eddydevries
I know, the 24 hours hasn't been left yet, but to prevent you for searching the town/village (which doesn't exist):
This user abbreviated the name of the city of
Wassenaar into
Wass (example:
this note).
So to plot the dot for this (and the other 10 notes), all you have to do is merge
Wass into
Wassenaar.