EuroBillTracker

Noticed some strange entries regarding M/U by user rakel 1988.
For example, https://pt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121067939" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As far as I am aware, has not yet printed .
Maybe a mistake?
Or a fake?
Thanks.

portaonze wrote:Noticed some strange entries regarding M/U by user rakel 1988.
For example, https://pt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121067939" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As far as I am aware, has not yet printed .
Maybe a mistake?
Or a fake?

Sometimes such errors are only typos - in this case the notes should be and not

PIŠKOTEK entered this fiver in 2007. It was found by aspik, 2219 days later. The note become a hit in serie F/N, since the latter user entered more notes of that series. (I just noticed that the hit has been moderated).

Friendly Hits ?

https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/ ... ser=168536

Users :
a) popman : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?user=167818
b) serguey : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?user=168536

it seems to be a hit resulting from a direct exchange between bill collectors (be careful if moderating: it's only suspect to me, I can't prove!)
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121752759" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

the following 2 hits of spartan1964 seem to be in the same case

user: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?user=163256" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

See this, an-148 :

19/10/2012 :

Eureka.72 wrote:2012-10-19 15:16:21 Xxxxx2837xxx Rxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:16:21 Xxxxx2837xxx Rxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:16:21 Xxxxx2837xxx (+) Rxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:16:21 Xxxxx2837xxx (+) Rxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)

User spartan1964

same date :

Eureka.72 wrote:2012-10-19 15:19:41 Yxxxx1144xxx Nxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:19:41 Yxxxx1144xxx Nxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:19:41 Yxxxx1144xxx Nxxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:18:05 Xxxxx0523xxx Exxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)
2012-10-19 15:18:05 Xxxxx0523xxx (*) Exxxxx Trenčín ( Eslováquia, 911 08)

User spartan1964

For your information, spartan1964 writes sometimes on FaceBook, into the "EBT "group...
Like for these two notes :

https://sk.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121502745
https://sk.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121502748

And I have received a strange mail this evening - concerning two Hits with these f.................ing guy !

https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=87571249
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=94375877

The two Hits are (fortunately ! ) moderated, but if you look at this screen :

https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/ ... ser=163256

You will see names of EBTers (like me) who are "€€€-notes purchasers" of.........................g.s.51. And I am sure that this guy has received "my" two notes via g.s.51.

Ihmo, as all €€€-collectors who introduces their notes into EBT, all hits of spartan1964 must be moderated, as €€€-collector.

it's my opinion too !

Mkay wrote:[...]
User tonellosala

He entered a lot of bills in series today.

an-148 wrote:hit in serie: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121595921" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
user: tonellosala: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?user=119780" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

tonellosala (119780): 1315 notes deleted

And some other:

ZalejoZ (180300): 1 notes deleted
a.palou.m (171207): 1 note
DazedShaft96 (177182): 1 note

And again some older cases, where the users showed some years ago a period of missbehaviour, but we avoid to restrict the account, because the entries of the last years are looking good:

le Michel'ange (130057): 1872 notes deleted
pantoufle (63758): 1754 notes

Tarmo wrote:PIŠKOTEK entered this fiver in 2007. It was found by aspik, 2219 days later. The note become a hit in serie F/N, since the latter user entered more notes of that series. (I just noticed that the hit has been moderated).

Indeed a example of a "hit in series", where we proofed, that the first user was faking:

PIŠKOTEK (97909): 60 notes

Thankfully it is moderated automaticly, but still, I have a bad feeling about this.
and a hit in less than 10 minutes.


(addition)
One user in the happy possession of 2 accounts?

ErGo wrote:PIŠKOTEK (97909): 60 notes

Good detective work.

jrnsndrs wrote:Thankfully it is moderated automaticly, but still, I have a bad feeling about this.
and a hit in less than 10 minutes.

(addition)
One user in the happy possession of 2 accounts?

It seems that there are two users (verdi19 and verderi) and they are friends. This triple hit states that verderi got the note from verdi 19. Or then there's just one user trying to poorly hide the location connection between the user locations. Verdi19 entered the notes as 28300 Pori, while verderi as 28300 Satakunta. Same post code, with the correct location = Pori. Satakunta is just the name of the whole region (including also Pori). The more I think of these two alternatives, the more I'm getting the impression that there's just one user with two accounts.

friendly hits
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121818245" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
the comment says "geruild met", that is "exchanged with".
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=121818341" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
the comment says "ook geruild met", that is "also exchanged with".

Tarmo wrote:

ErGo wrote:PIŠKOTEK (97909): 60 notes

Good detective work.

jrnsndrs wrote:Thankfully it is moderated automaticly, but still, I have a bad feeling about this.
and a hit in less than 10 minutes.

(addition)
One user in the happy possession of 2 accounts?

It seems that there are two users (verdi19 and verderi) and they are friends. This triple hit states that verderi got the note from verdi 19. Or then there's just one user trying to poorly hide the location connection between the user locations. Verdi19 entered the notes as 28300 Pori, while verderi as 28300 Satakunta. Same post code, with the correct location = Pori. Satakunta is just the name of the whole region (including also Pori). The more I think of these two alternatives, the more I'm getting the impression that there's just one user with two accounts.

Just noted that both have hidden the single hit from their hit list.
(this link is to verderi but verdi19 did the same thing)

And that is the last thing I am going to say about this one. I think the cleaning girls are reading along and they know what to do and what not to do.