Page 108 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:31 pm
by groentje
My habbit of using the Dutch name for French places, if existing, has created another profile.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=158457" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (Belle) should be merged withhttp://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=6912" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (Bailleul).
BTW, if possible,
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=48245" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a new city profile, the coordinates are 50.7997222222222, 2.79972222222222, according to the all knowing Wikipedia.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:36 pm
by erasmuston
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=77624" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; mixes two cities, one Rabat in Morocco, and one in Malta. My bills are all from Malta
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:47 am
by Burdie
Kinvarra or Kinvara has three different dots
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=67553441 is the right dot
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=67553439 is in Germany
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=132135 is in the UK
BTW there are two Kinvarra's in Ireland county Galway. Both also known with one or two R's. But I think the first dot is on the right spot
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 6:54 pm
by Jackgaillard
could you add this place :
Name : Le Chesne
Postcode : 08390
map : 49.513535 4.763174
i had this note :
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=67624113 there
thanks a lot
jack
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:53 pm
by gergapsek
Please change the city profile of Gösselsdorf:
First appearance on EBT: 2009-08-03
Last Note Entered: 2009-08-10 08:13:49
Users who entered notes from this city: 1
EBT users living in this city: 0 (0 active)
Hits involving Gösselsdorf: 0
Notes entered in Gösselsdorf: 2
International rank
Notes: 37.274
National rank
Notes: 7.902
It is not in

!
Here are the correct coordinates:

Lat: 46.5744° Lon: 14.6339°
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=30546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:22 am
by ravestorm
gergapsek wrote:Please change the city profile of Gösselsdorf:
....
Gösselsdorf you mean is already present into the location db and is beloging to
Eberndorf
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:30 am
by Juud
The user that enterd
this bill made a mistake. Uithoorn is a city in the Netherlands, not in Afghanistan.... Zipcode is allright.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:00 pm
by Wovychamois
Hello,
I inserted some notes from:
Gölköy:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=67133827" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The dot is misplaced. It is a little village on egean coast near Bodrum Mugla province (as you can see from the zip code), not the city in Ordu province on Black Sea. Its coordinates are 37° 7'4.20"N - 27°23'30.32"E (sorry but i am not able to find the decimal ones).
Marathounda:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=67078787" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These notes have been put in "Symi" profile, but this place is quite far from Symi city (half an hour by car).
Its coordinates are 36°33'57.42"N - 27°51'44.30"E.
I kindly ask you to create a new profile for Marathounda.
Thanks and greetings.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:09 pm
by gergapsek
Missing dot for: Nova vas pri Markovcih Lat.: 46.3874° Lon.: 15.9324°
http://si.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=158548" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
THX
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:28 am
by yli
I am missing a

dot on
my dotmap
Veľká Ida (South East of Košice) is just below the dotborder (at least most of the village)
The green line is my cycleroute. I didn't enter notes from the other villages inside this dot.
according to wikipedia the co-ordinates are : 48.600, 21.167
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:50 pm
by Pole Doctor
Two homonymous french cities (both named Sainte-Marie-du-Mont) are merged.
The
existing profile points to a city located near the Channel (with postcode 50380). I entered
a note (and spent a few more this morning) in a small city located in the Alps, which coordinates are 45.406944, 5.946389 (postcode 38660) -- notes appear 700 km off their real position
Thanks for the fix !

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:53 pm
by Wovychamois
Reporting a missing dot for a hit entered in Barabò:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=158491" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It is a part of Nogara municipality in Italy.
Coordinates : 45.183333 N, 11.066667 E
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:03 pm
by BaliBennie
All coordinates have been fixed.
To Yli: The coordinates of Veľká Ida were indeed in the north part of the town. I have set the coordinates now more to the south near the busstation.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:52 am
by yli
BaliBennie wrote:To Yli: The coordinates of Veľká Ida were indeed in the north part of the town. I have set the coordinates now more to the south near the busstation.
Thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:27 pm
by Phaseolus
I am still missing this dot :
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=67665080
Ranchot :
47°09'03,75"N
5°43'28,86"E
Merci