Page 109 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 9:53 pm
by BaliBennie
Coordinates have been added for Ranchot.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 11:02 pm
by Wovychamois
Please insert the dot for Transacqua: http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=158686" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

46.183333°N, 11.833333°E

Thanks.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:07 am
by Adela.Merchan
I've inserted this note in a location new for EBT.

These are the data:
Location: Santo Domingo-Caudilla (province of Toledo, Spain)
Postal Code: 45526
Coordinates: 40.011944° N, -4.325556° W

Thanks in advance

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:39 pm
by jovada
[SOLVED! Thanks!]

According to the NIG-tool, these are the countries where I've entered notes:

Countries with notes entered (10)
Belgium - 77031 (99,4 %)
Italy - 203 (0,3 %)
France - 120 (0,2 %)
Germany - 51 (0,1 %)
Netherlands - 41 (0,1 %)
Austria - 16 (0,0 %)
Slovakia - 10 (0,0 %)
Slovenia - 8 (0,0 %)
Turkey - 7 (0,0 %)
Luxembourg - 1 (0,0 %)

However, my dotmap shows a strange Russian dot... Any idea why?

Image

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:09 pm
by tigerpranke
jovada wrote:However, my dotmap shows a strange Russian dot... Any idea why?
Have you spent your holidays in South Tyrol, Italy? It seems that the coordinates for 39040 Margreid, Italy (Italian: Magrè) are wrong. Maybe you should change the name of the location to the Italian spelling.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:29 pm
by jovada
tigerpranke wrote:Have you spent your holidays in South Tyrol, Italy? It seems that the coordinates for 39040 Margreid, Italy (Italian: Magrè) are wrong. Maybe you should change the name of the location to the Italian spelling.
Isn't a dot linked to a postal code instead of the name?
Anyway, I've changed the spelling but it didn't work.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:44 pm
by R/J
jovada wrote:
tigerpranke wrote:Have you spent your holidays in South Tyrol, Italy? It seems that the coordinates for 39040 Margreid, Italy (Italian: Magrè) are wrong. Maybe you should change the name of the location to the Italian spelling.
Isn't a dot linked to a postal code instead of the name?
Anyway, I've changed the spelling but it didn't work.
As far as I know: to both.

Edit: coordinates are in the CSV-file, so you can check to find the note(s) that belong to that dot. And try to find the outlier.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:51 pm
by doiknow
The coordinates for N-4828 Mjåvatn are 58.539029N 8.489524E according to google maps. (Missing a dot there).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:48 pm
by lmviterbo
doiknow wrote:The coordinates for N-4828 Mjåvatn are 58.539029N 8.489524E according to google maps. (Missing a dot there).
Coordinates assigned, thanks, it's already on the map.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 5:03 pm
by doiknow
Thanks for your quick acting 8) so you just qualified to enter the next one:
The coordinates of N-4836 Arendal are 58.460385N, 8.765481E according to google maps.

(Well as I don't plan another trip to Norway this year, there shouldn't be any new entries from me this year - but never say never again :wink: )

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:24 pm
by lmviterbo
doiknow wrote:The coordinates of N-4836 Arendal are 58.460385N, 8.765481E according to google maps.
Done

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:01 pm
by R/J
lmviterbo wrote:
doiknow wrote:The coordinates of N-4836 Arendal are 58.460385N, 8.765481E according to google maps.
Done
I think you made a mistake between east and west, because now the dot ends up somewhere west of Scotland.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:11 pm
by lmviterbo
R/J wrote:I think you made a mistake between east and west, because now the dot ends up somewhere west of Scotland.
You're absolutely right. Sorry, my mistake. Done again. :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:47 pm
by tigerpranke
Hello! Missing dot for :flag-de: 82431 Einsiedl, coordinates are 47.569574° N, 11.3026° E

edit: thanks for the quick reaction

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:21 am
by tigerpranke
Hello again!

Missing dot for :flag-de: 94419 Haberskirchen, coordinates are 48.5114° N, 12.6514° E
Haberskirchen is a village in the municipality of :flag-de: 94419 Reisbach (Niederbayern) :arrow: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reisbach

tigerpranke