EuroBillTracker

And some other minor cleanings:

llollek (140844): 224 notes deleted
zecke (31361): 86 notes
degennaro89 (182160): 5 notes
bolleke_21 (11429): 1 note
keppe (87241): 11 notes
wena (87239): 5 notes

Crazy Bob wrote:

JRR wrote:Hit in series with a by martst

2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)
2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)
2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)
2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx (*) Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)
2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)
2013-05-13 14:32:25 Xxxxx5089xxx Rxxxxx 's-Heerenberg ( Nederland, 7041)

Hmm, interesting. Looking at the previous hit by martst:

2013-05-09 07:35:55 Xxxxx9482xxx Pxxxxx Emmerich ( Flag for Duitsland Duitsland 46446)
2013-05-09 07:35:55 Xxxxx9482xxx (*) Pxxxxx Emmerich ( Flag for Duitsland Duitsland 46446)
2013-05-09 07:35:55 Xxxxx9482xxx Pxxxxx Emmerich ( Flag for Duitsland Duitsland 46446)

Sounds like future cleaning girl material...

This is also a hit in a consecutive series:

https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=125181022" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

this as well: https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=125210605" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LArdennais wrote:Please look at some Hits (not ALL Hits !) of User "Jarči" (169568)

Maybe a little more suspicious than that. How likely is for someone in Slovakia to find 200 V/V notes in a row, including a hit with a public serial? As far as I know, V/V weren't sent to Slovakia, and I doubt a collector (which Jarči claims to be) would ask a friend to send him 200 notes.

These hits, made by spartan1964 aren't hits in series, but I think it's very unlikely that 5 of the entered 11 are hits with this long time-span. BTW, if you look at the comment of for example this hit it's more unlikely: even for a it would still be UNC after more than 3 years????????

2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 1826
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 1616
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Liège - Trenčín LArdennais - spartan1964 913 1165
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 854
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Tenneville - Trenčín LArdennais - spartan1964 911 704

lmviterbo wrote:

LArdennais wrote:Please look at some Hits (not ALL Hits !) of User "Jarči" (169568)

Maybe a little more suspicious than that. How likely is for someone in Slovakia to find 200 V/V notes in a row, including a hit with a public serial? As far as I know, V/V weren't sent to Slovakia, and I doubt a collector (which Jarči claims to be) would ask a friend to send him 200 notes.

It looks like he read your post: he's now entering U/U notes instead.........

eddydevries wrote:These hits, made by spartan1964 aren't hits in series, but I think it's very unlikely that 5 of the entered 11 are hits with this long time-span. BTW, if you look at the comment of for example this hit it's more unlikely: even for a it would still be UNC after more than 3 years????????

2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 1826
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 1616
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Liège - Trenčín LArdennais - spartan1964 913 1165
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Blankenberge - Trenčín fcbruges - spartan1964 1093 854
2013-05-16 14:54:21 Tenneville - Trenčín LArdennais - spartan1964 911 704

Eddy, this is NOT the 1st time that I have some Hits with this well-knowm €€€-collector, this is NOT the 1st time I ask to MODERATE ALL these Hits (mines' Hits) because...spartan1964 deals with a very well-known €€€-collector / searcher / writer AND fcbruges & myself are "purchasers" of the guy AND spartan1964 has really had these notes...in Reims ! How can I am sure to say that ? See here :



Well... OK, it's interesting to know that these notes have made a long trip from to , with a "STOP" in - But these are NOT interesting Hits.

LArdennais, please check your inbox.

Done

I was looking at the notes entered in Latvia, and there I noticed these notes:

2013-05-12 16:26:53 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Salacgrīva ( Letland, 4033)
2013-05-12 15:46:52 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Tūja ( Letland, 4022)
2013-05-12 14:45:49 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Cēsis ( Letland, 4101)
2013-05-12 11:44:24 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Smiltene ( Letland, 4729)
2013-05-12 10:55:05 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Valka ( Letland, 4701)

2013-05-11 21:19:10 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Alūksne ( Letland, 4301)
2013-05-11 21:16:42 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Ape ( Letland, 4337)

It's impossible to find 7 notes from the same series in 7 different cities !!

I'm surprised (I didn't suspect this user to do so): the user is Kraan.

Six hits, the same users at same time.
I supose that at least, five of then must be moderated, right?

2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Tampere - Ulvila - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia manselaine - mautzahamis - LeeTuu 106 921
2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Ulvila - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia mautzahamis - LeeTuu 0 24
2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Ulvila - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia mautzahamis - LeeTuu 0 23
2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Vanha-ulvila - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia mautzahamis - LeeTuu 1 14
2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Pori - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia mautzahamis - LeeTuu 0 13
2013-05-16 21:30:49 10 EUR Ulvila - Ulvila Flag for Finlandia Flag for Finlandia mautzahamis - LeeTuu 0 2

Not suspicious but imho not found in Afganistan;

https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=125413178

namastebaba wrote:Not suspicious but imho not found in Afganistan;

https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=125413178

It's just a mistake. The user is Portuguese, probably from Aveiro, in which region, according to his map, his notes are registered. That's what happens if you press the tab key and then blindly write Aveiro (again).

The automatic EBT location system has found a sibling and placed the note correctly in Portugal (on the map).

I actually don't know what us geomanagers should or can do in such a case. As far as I know, nothing without getting in touch with the user.

That username is priceless, for us Portuguese.

eddydevries wrote:I was looking at the notes entered in Latvia, and there I noticed these notes:

2013-05-12 16:26:53 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Salacgrīva ( Letland, 4033)
2013-05-12 15:46:52 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Tūja ( Letland, 4022)
2013-05-12 14:45:49 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Cēsis ( Letland, 4101)
2013-05-12 11:44:24 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Smiltene ( Letland, 4729)
2013-05-12 10:55:05 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Valka ( Letland, 4701)

2013-05-11 21:19:10 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Alūksne ( Letland, 4301)
2013-05-11 21:16:42 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Ape ( Letland, 4337)

It's impossible to find 7 notes from the same series in 7 different cities !!

I'm surprised (I didn't suspect this user to do so): the user is Kraan.

Dear eddydevries,



I noticed your remark about my small Latvian trip in the EBT forum and I agree – my actions seem to be strange or even suspicious. But let me clear this out. I had a small road trip with my friend (who is not an EBT user) in the northern part of Latvia and I had the intention to collect some new dots as well. But unfortunately it’s almost impossible to change some euro notes in these small places at weekends . My friend offered, that he gives me some brand new 5 euro notes, if I wanted them. I thought about it and decided, that this tracking style is not brilliant, but on the other hand it is not against rules. I obtained the note in Latvia and I entered this note correctly at this point. After that I repeated this operation in some other small Latvian towns and villages. All notes were entered by phone strictly in places, where I got the notes. You can even check the time difference between different locations.



I’m sorry about the confusion.



Kindest regards,

Kraan

Kraan wrote:

eddydevries wrote:I was looking at the notes entered in Latvia, and there I noticed these notes:

2013-05-12 16:26:53 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Salacgrīva ( Letland, 4033)
2013-05-12 15:46:52 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Tūja ( Letland, 4022)
2013-05-12 14:45:49 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Cēsis ( Letland, 4101)
2013-05-12 11:44:24 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Smiltene ( Letland, 4729)
2013-05-12 10:55:05 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Valka ( Letland, 4701)

2013-05-11 21:19:10 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Alūksne ( Letland, 4301)
2013-05-11 21:16:42 Xxxxx9195xxx Rxxxxx Ape ( Letland, 4337)

It's impossible to find 7 notes from the same series in 7 different cities !!

I'm surprised (I didn't suspect this user to do so): the user is Kraan.

Dear eddydevries,



I noticed your remark about my small Latvian trip in the EBT forum and I agree – my actions seem to be strange or even suspicious. But let me clear this out. I had a small road trip with my friend (who is not an EBT user) in the northern part of Latvia and I had the intention to collect some new dots as well. But unfortunately it’s almost impossible to change some euro notes in these small places at weekends . My friend offered, that he gives me some brand new 5 euro notes, if I wanted them. I thought about it and decided, that this tracking style is not brilliant, but on the other hand it is not against rules. I obtained the note in Latvia and I entered this note correctly at this point. After that I repeated this operation in some other small Latvian towns and villages. All notes were entered by phone strictly in places, where I got the notes. You can even check the time difference between different locations.



I’m sorry about the confusion.



Kindest regards,

Kraan

I think this is not the way to collect new dots.