Re: Suspicious notes and users
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 3:46 pm
The comment of beaweb says, that she found this bills in a bundle of the bank of spain. Do you really think, Daina could insert her note in this bundle? And I have no doubt that the comment of beaweb is correct. She never faked any note!-flop- wrote:Well, there are several aspects of this hitlist that appear really unlikely (let me avoid the word "suspicious").nossi wrote:What is suspicious with that? Every year one hit and beaweb ist a powertracker...Crazy Bob wrote:beaweb and Daina Gaida seem to exchange bills:
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/? ... ser=129825" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Three hits between them, on a total (for Daina Gaida) of four.
A couple of examples:
1) Three hits of Daina Gaida upon a total of four involve the same user and this is not a user living nearby but more 800 km far. Maybe there is an explanation for this but until this will not be displayed the event is at least "strange".
2) Daina Gaina has tracked 217 notes and only four of them have become hits. Beaweb found no one of the 213 "normal notes" but two of the four hits. I don't know the reason of it but you have to admit the this is a quite unlikely event.
These are just probability considerations. Nothing more.
It is not uncommon, that a user found a note from us and in the next day we found a note from him and this was the last hit with him for the next 6 month. You should study statistics and you will see, that such things are normal.
The first hit is a pure Berlin-hit and I can not see any strange thing with it. And the same with the next 2 hits. And beaweb found the last note after more then 4 (!) years. Much work to construct only one hit. And at least Diana insert her last note one year ago. Do you really think that is typically for fakers?
