Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
klapotec
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2630
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:18 pm
Location: Steiermark / Štajerska / Styria

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by klapotec »

vermeer wrote:I have doubts about the kilometers.

It is more than the 0 stated; it is at least 2.

http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=51245125" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That is not unusual when no coordinates are assigned, as was the case with 9738 Groningen. Fixed now.
User avatar
Sneakster
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 11:42 pm
Location: Breda,The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Sneakster »

I just inserted a note I received in Buren on Ameland,province Friesland,the Netherlands.The zipcode is 9164.

The dot however,is situated in the province Gelderland, where is another Buren.That zipcode is 4116.
This needs a correction I think.

Greetz,Hans
doiknow
Euro-Master in Training
Euro-Master in Training
Posts: 766
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Hannover, Germany

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by doiknow »

There seems to be an error concerning the coordinates of Arendal:
This note was entered in Arendal but according to magpies hitmap tool the coordinates of Arendal moved somehow west to a road that leads to a very nice recreative enviroment. Nonetheless i prefer these bills to move to Arendal (the red building next to the curch with the flat roof is the bank where I received the bill)

I think this also is the source of the missing dot i wrote of in my last post in this topic
One Currency, one Union, one Eurobilltracker...
My dots are of the same order as 10.
User avatar
roberdy
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1328
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: Nürnberger Land, Germany
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by roberdy »

doiknow wrote:There seems to be an error concerning the coordinates of Arendal:
This note was entered in Arendal but according to magpies hitmap tool the coordinates of Arendal moved somehow west to a road that leads to a very nice recreative enviroment. Nonetheless i prefer these bills to move to Arendal (the red building next to the curch with the flat roof is the bank where I received the bill)

I think this also is the source of the missing dot i wrote of in my last post in this topic
OK, someone typed 8.46585 instead of 8.76585 as longitude before... now fixed :)
User avatar
bzajc
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:34 pm
Location: Velenje, Slovenia
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by bzajc »

Note entered in Vas should be in Slovenia. The coordinates are
45.472456 N, 14.872719 E.

Also this hit.
User avatar
klapotec
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2630
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:18 pm
Location: Steiermark / Štajerska / Styria

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by klapotec »

bzajc wrote:Note entered in Vas should be in Slovenia. The coordinates are
45.472456 N, 14.872719 E.

Also this hit.
fixed.
User avatar
Crazy Bob
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7431
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Crazy Bob »

Crazy Bob wrote:Bleijerheide is a neighbourhood of Kerkrade, so it should be merged into the main profile of Kerkrade.

sources: here and here
Hate to quote myself, but I see newer requests being taken care of so this one may have been missed somehow...
User avatar
lmviterbo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by lmviterbo »

Phaseolus wrote:I am missing some dots :

Portugal
[…]
Modivas (4485-592) : 41°17'40.65"N 8°41'26.86"O
[…]
I have been warned by CarlosManta that this one still didn't have its own geocoords. Well, it's done. http://pt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=157376" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13441
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Hi, I am missing a dot in Romania : http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=68947364" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The village is Blejoi

It's located west from Ploieşti just in suburb.
User avatar
Phaseolus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 13441
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Quelque part ou même ailleurs !
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Phaseolus »

Phaseolus wrote:Hi, I am missing a dot in Romania : http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=68947364" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The village is Blejoi

It's located west from Ploieşti just in suburb.
the location should be : 44°59'51,15" N and 26°00' 15,79" E

Multumesc !
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

concerning this hit:
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=61844150" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Santa Teresa Gallura (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Teresa_Gallura" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
has those coordinates: 41° 15′ 00″ north / 9° 11′ 00″ east
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

an-148 wrote:concerning this hit:
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=61844150" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Santa Teresa Gallura (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Teresa_Gallura" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
has those coordinates: 41° 15′ 00″ north / 9° 11′ 00″ east

whoow :!: how quick you made the correction :!: congratulations :wink:
thanks a lot
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
bzajc
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:34 pm
Location: Velenje, Slovenia
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by bzajc »

Please merge Skoplje to Skopje. Same city, different spelling.
User avatar
vermeer
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 13187
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Groningen, The Netherlands

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by vermeer »

Please make Oldenkotte dutch again and not german.

http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=68903738" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
capitobi
Euro-Expert
Euro-Expert
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:01 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by capitobi »

I just noticed that the coordinates for these two notes are still missing. I don't have time to find them myself right now, so if somebody else has, please give me my dots. :)
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”