Page 114 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:53 am
by dargqui
Missing dot for
Otero de Herreros 
(Segovia). C.P. 40422
Coordinates:
N 40º 49' 12.47''
W 4º 12' 32.8''
Thanks in advance.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:29 pm
by maarsy
to get back to this the hits stil have 0 km
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:01 pm
by SUp3rFM
I've just entered a note in Lébény, Hungary. There's no dot there, I just confirmed it on dots.php. Figured I could help you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9b%C3%A9ny" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; , Coordinates 47.736264,17.393417
or N 47 44.176, E 17 23.605 or N 47 44 10.55, E 17 23 36.30. The postal code is:
9155
Another dot in my map on yet another dot hunting trip, this time to Hungary, Austria and Slovakia.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:52 pm
by WinstonSmith
http://eo.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=92781" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This was the profile of a Finnish town named Sola. When I entered a note from an Italian town named Sola, it was automatically assigned to the Finnish city profile, which now subsumes both locations.
These should be split. The Italian Sola is located at 45,4832 N; 9,7249 E. Thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 10:46 am
by googlejaps
I discovered a wrong city profile
The profile of
Bildhoven is a spelling mistake and should be merged with
Bilthoven.
Thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:43 am
by googlejaps
I found some profiles that should be merged because of spelling mistakes or typo's
Merge
Bronchorst into
Bronckhorst
Merge
Trich into
Tricht
Merge
Leidem into
Leiden
Merge
Woudebverg into
Woudenberg
Merge
Maarsen into
Maarssen
Merge
Hoogkarpsel into
Hoogkarspel
Thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:50 pm
by knebb
Hi,
Missing dot for
Chiseldon (UK), coordinates are 51.514125°N 1.734796°W
Narberth (UK), coordinates are 51.7989°N 4.7423°W
Pembroke Dock (UK), coordinates are 51.69333°N 4.94584°W
Penllergaer (UK), coordinates are 51.66990°N 4.00709°W
All collected from the British Post Offices

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:38 am
by maarsy
do they always have euro's in stock
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:01 pm
by groentje
http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=65038" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Neder-Over-Heembeek is not written with as -Hembeek, not even in French. Please change.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:26 am
by yli
Missing dots for
Dobrota
42.454 N, 18.768 E according to wikipedia
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:02 am
by eddydevries
From the dutch forum:
Please change the name of this cityprofile:
Aalst/Waalre (Noord-Brabant)
There are more cities called "Aalst" in the Netherlands, but there's only one in the province of Noord-Brabant.
To keep the names of the profiles in the same way, the name of this profile should be "
Aalst (Noord-Brabant)".
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:26 am
by Pole Doctor
Just bumping this one
Pole Doctor wrote:A couple of weeks ago, I entered bills in the spanish location of
Montserrat. It looks like its position is messed up with the nearby city of
Monistrol de Montserrat's one, which lies in the nearby dot (see
Google Maps). The correct coordinates of Montserrat (from Google Earth) are 41.593225° N, 1.837374° W.
Moreover, the correct spelling of
this city is Les Marches, not les Marchés

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:51 pm
by ravestorm
Pole Doctor wrote:Just bumping this one
Pole Doctor wrote:A couple of weeks ago, I entered bills in the spanish location of
Montserrat. It looks like its position is messed up with the nearby city of
Monistrol de Montserrat's one, which lies in the nearby dot (see
Google Maps). The correct coordinates of Montserrat (from Google Earth) are 41.593225° N, 1.837374° W.
Moreover, the correct spelling of
this city is Les Marches, not les Marchés

Fixed

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:01 pm
by bzajc
Missing dot for
Sremski Karlovci 45.2, 19.933333
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:29 pm
by yli
missing dot for
Istočno Novo Sarajevo (Bosnia-Hercegovina).
This municipality is also known als Serb Sarajevo. Translated it means East New Sarajevo, but stangely it's south west of the center of Sarajevo. It's the place where busses from Serbia to Sarajevo arrive. It is part of Republika Srpska (Serb Bosnia) and no part of Sarajevo (what is part of the Federation between Croats and Muslims in BiH)
according to wikipedia : 43.82 N, 18.359167 E