portaonze wrote:English!
presidente wrote:please in english!!!!
Although I am not beaweb, I have tried to tell those of you, who don't speak English, what beaweb wrote. If beaweb writes her statement in English, this post can be deleted. Of course, I cannot say more, than she said in her posting.
beaweb wants avij to open a new thread with the title: legal or legitimate
Then, she says, that:
1.) an-148 is no supicous user nor are his notes suspicous
2.) that there is a difference between normal and "forced" hits
She then gives the example of her weekly amount of

bank notes, which would deliver at least 30 hits with

Abercrombie and 270 moderated ones, if she would pay them in at the Commerzbank in

Liebenwalde. She asks the uestion, whether these hits were normal, or forced.
Then, she says how she gets her notes. She receives her

in the original packaging from the ECB branch in Berlin, enters them to EBT and brings them back, so that they come back to the Central Bank, or to the "Cash Group" company, which refills ATMs.
After that, she evaluates, whether it is in compliance with the rules, if someone recieves notes in small foreign countries and spends all of them in Helmbrechts, knowing, that they will become hits. In her opinion, this is according to the rules of EBT.
But she asks whether this is legitimate, as EBT wants to show the natural way of bank notes throughout the Eurozone.
She pleads, that the "intensive trackers" (sorry, I didn't find a better way to translate or paraphrase it

) should take more care, as such actions could frighten or dishearten the small trackers, who only enter some notes per day.
Her proposal is, that we should discuss this in a new topic.
In the P.S. she emphasises, that the things she said above are also about the hits with Paraguay.