In a ICE it's quite impossible to determine where you are ordining beer at 250-300 km/h
This travel I also had to buy a trainticket in the train


Why?haemoglobin wrote:sorry, but dothunting that way really sucks !!!!!!!

That's funny, you know...knebb wrote: Assuming you're in a train with 2 stops between you start and destination. Let's call it A, B, C and D while D is destination
You buy the first beer shortly after departure (one dot in A)
The next beer (and note!) you get after the stop in B. Train travels again. So it's one dot in B.
For C it's the same. Pay your beer after the train left C and you have another stop.
That's it.
What's wrong with it?

I think it is a rather... liberal way of determining where you got the note. I certainly wouldn't do it like that. If I did, I could have had a lot more dots.Jes wrote:That's funny, you know...knebb wrote: Assuming you're in a train with 2 stops between you start and destination. Let's call it A, B, C and D while D is destination
You buy the first beer shortly after departure (one dot in A)
The next beer (and note!) you get after the stop in B. Train travels again. So it's one dot in B.
For C it's the same. Pay your beer after the train left C and you have another stop.
That's it.
What's wrong with it?![]()
![]()
I don't think there's something wrong on it... but obvoiusly it is not very "orthodox"![]()
Interesting.... I wonder what other people think.
CAll it how you want it to call. I call it the "official" way (and in my opinion only way that makes sense).MDeen wrote: I think it is a rather... liberal way of determining where you got the note. I certainly wouldn't do it like that. If I did, I could have had a lot more dots.




