Page 138 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
dserrano5 wrote:(Originally posted here). The maps for this hit show a horizontal arrow that comes from the left edge of the image, instead of having the right source (Brasilia).
Done, it seems that someone has put 478978 as a coordinate instead of 47.8978.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:40 pm
by rlaurenssen
R/J wrote:Could Zeilberg (example note) be unmerged from Deurne? I agree that the situation is somewhat vague, but almost a year ago the community of Deurne has placed blue village signs for Zeilberg. I think this should be enough to qualify for a separate EBT-profile.
I Agree, this village has been a part of Deurne for a few years, now they have gone back to their own municipality. It's the only village that has gone back to their own
municipality in the Netherlands this year. Once again a special place where the rules do not apply for regular places.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:42 pm
by Yelverdack
There's an uncorrect dot for the city of Sainte-Croix, Switzerland
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The dot appears on the city of Sainte-Croix, France, but they are two different cities.
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The coordinates for the swiss Sainte-Croix are
46° 49' 00'' N
6° 30' 00'' E

Thanks a lot

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:47 pm
by €€F

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
Yelverdack wrote:There's an uncorrect dot for the city of Sainte-Croix, Switzerland
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The dot appears on the city of Sainte-Croix, France, but they are two different cities.
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The coordinates for the swiss Sainte-Croix are
46° 49' 00'' N
6° 30' 00'' E

Thanks a lot
They are registered as one city in the EBT Database, I will let them make seperate. The coordinates are added.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
€€F wrote:http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=83326698
No dot
Francheville
03430
Done

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:13 pm
by Yelverdack
rlaurenssen wrote:
Yelverdack wrote:There's an uncorrect dot for the city of Sainte-Croix, Switzerland
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The dot appears on the city of Sainte-Croix, France, but they are two different cities.
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The coordinates for the swiss Sainte-Croix are
46° 49' 00'' N
6° 30' 00'' E

Thanks a lot


They are registered as one city in the EBT Database, I will let them make seperate. The coordinates are added.
Thanks, the 3 recent bills here :

http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823357" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823294" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823246" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

are now at the right place but if you click on Sainte-Croix (CH) in this notes link, you'll see there is only one city in France
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (whose dot has now moved at a wrong place)
that merges the bills entered in Sainte-Croix (CH) and Sainte-Croix (F) and the related visitors.
For example, user Greteck has not entered notes in Sainte-Croix (F) but in CH.

If you look at the swiss visited cities, Sainte-Croix (CH) doesn't exist.

Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:03 am
by ravestorm
Yelverdack wrote:....Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?
Indeed.
Both Sainte-Croix have their own profile by now :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:56 pm
by vermeer
I want to have distance for this hit below.

http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=57838889" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:22 pm
by rlaurenssen
vermeer wrote:I want to have distance for this hit below.

http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=57838889" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Done.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:38 pm
by Yelverdack
ravestorm wrote:
Yelverdack wrote:....Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?
Indeed.
Both Sainte-Croix have their own profile by now :wink:
Thanks a lot

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:34 pm
by maarsy
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=75958473" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

turnhout is most definatly not in australia

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:48 pm
by de*lerger
de*lerger wrote:The name Seeryp (postal code 8892) is officially changed into Striep. So these two profiles can be merged.
Just discovered that the old name is added to the new profile :?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:19 pm
by Kleman
Hi !

I don't really understand why this note (and this one) was automatically put into this city 8O

not the same name (but close, of course), note the same zipcode...


thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:25 am
by yli
I also don't know, there was already a profile of Saint-Michel. I put your note of département 16 into that profile.

It might be because you didn't use a - in the location name, just like same spelling of Saint-Michel-sur-Orge.