Page 138 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
dserrano5 wrote:(Originally posted
here). The maps for
this hit show a horizontal arrow that comes from the left edge of the image, instead of having the right source (Brasilia).
Done, it seems that someone has put 478978 as a coordinate instead of 47.8978.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:40 pm
by rlaurenssen
R/J wrote:Could Zeilberg (
example note) be unmerged from Deurne? I agree that the situation is somewhat vague, but almost a year ago the community of Deurne has placed blue village signs for Zeilberg. I think this should be enough to qualify for a separate EBT-profile.
I Agree, this village has been a part of Deurne for a few years, now they have gone back to their own municipality. It's the only village that has gone back to their own
municipality in the Netherlands this year. Once again a special place where the rules do not apply for regular places.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:42 pm
by Yelverdack
There's an uncorrect dot for the city of Sainte-Croix, Switzerland
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The dot appears on the city of Sainte-Croix, France, but they are two different cities.
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The coordinates for the swiss Sainte-Croix are
46° 49' 00'' N
6° 30' 00'' E
Thanks a lot
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:47 pm
by €€F
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
They are registered as one city in the EBT Database, I will let them make seperate. The coordinates are added.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:19 pm
by rlaurenssen
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:13 pm
by Yelverdack
rlaurenssen wrote:
They are registered as one city in the EBT Database, I will let them make seperate. The coordinates are added.
Thanks, the 3 recent bills here :
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823357" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823294" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=83823246" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
are now at the right place but if you click on Sainte-Croix (CH) in this notes link, you'll see there is only one city in France
http://fr.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=159695" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (whose dot has now moved at a wrong place)
that merges the bills entered in Sainte-Croix (CH) and Sainte-Croix (F) and the related visitors.
For example, user Greteck has not entered notes in Sainte-Croix (F) but in CH.
If you look at the swiss visited cities, Sainte-Croix (CH) doesn't exist.
Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:03 am
by ravestorm
Yelverdack wrote:....Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?
Indeed.
Both Sainte-Croix have their own profile by now

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:56 pm
by vermeer
I want to have distance for this hit below.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=57838889" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:22 pm
by rlaurenssen
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:38 pm
by Yelverdack
ravestorm wrote:Yelverdack wrote:....Could you create a separate city profile for both, please ?
Indeed.
Both Sainte-Croix have their own profile by now

Thanks a lot
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:34 pm
by maarsy
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=75958473" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
turnhout is most definatly not in australia
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:48 pm
by de*lerger
de*lerger wrote:The name
Seeryp (postal code 8892) is officially changed into
Striep. So these two profiles can be merged.
Just discovered that the old name is added to the new profile

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:19 pm
by Kleman
Hi !
I don't really understand why
this note (and
this one) was
automatically put into
this city
not the same name (but close, of course), note the same zipcode...
thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:25 am
by yli
I also don't know, there was already a profile of
Saint-Michel. I put your note of département 16 into that profile.
It might be because you didn't use a - in the location name, just like same spelling of Saint-Michel-sur-Orge.