Page 139 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:00 am
by googlejaps
The new location manager sure makes it easy to spot some issues.
See the profile of
Peel en Maas
It contains both Baarlo (Limburg) as Baarlo. I guess these two can be (need to be) merged.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:14 am
by yli
googlejaps wrote:The new location manager sure makes it easy to spot some issues.
I might be a new location manager, but I mainly did french speaking locations
Anyway profiles are merged
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:33 am
by Kleman
yli wrote:I also don't know, there was already a profile of
Saint-Michel. I put your note of département 16 into that profile.
It might be because you didn't use a - in the location name, just like same spelling of Saint-Michel-sur-Orge.
Thanks Yli !
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:42 am
by Wovychamois
These 2 "Locca" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55876" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55877" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 "Levico" profiles have to be put together under "Levico Terme":
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=54753" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=54752" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=168164" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; has to be amended in Piazza (Terragnolo). The correct spelling is Terragnolo, not Terragnola.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:26 pm
by Wovychamois
These 2 "San Marino" profiles have to be put together under "San Marino":
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=168245" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=86219" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:45 pm
by rlaurenssen
Done, thanks for noticing.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:34 pm
by androl
Kleman wrote:I don't really understand why
this note (and
this one) was
automatically put into
this city
not the same name (but close, of course), note the same zipcode...
when there is only one profile with the newly entered city name, the new location will automatically be put into that profile, not regarding the post code. That is especially bad now when all the unused locations in the database have been deleted, there are more cases now where only one location of a place name exists, and when someone enters a note from one of the other places with the same name, the system thinks it is the same place.
Could it be a solution to use this automatic merge only in countries with many different post codes like the Netherlands?
Or only if the name of the location is the same as the name of the profile?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:38 pm
by Wovychamois
These 2 "Pas de la Casa" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=73185" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=156322" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 "Kiev" profiles have to be put together:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=46700" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 "Baarle" profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=160584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=6082" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:12 pm
by rlaurenssen
Pas de le casa and Pas de la Casa are merged.
Kiev seems to be done already
Baarle is indeed a seperate village within the municipality of Baarle-Hertog,
so this will remain this way.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:26 pm
by Zjonbelz
rlaurenssen wrote:
Baarle is indeed a seperate village within the municipality of Baarle-Hertog,
so this will remain this way.
No, this Baarle is a small community within the municipality of Gent. I entered the only note there. See this link:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baarle_(Oost-Vlaanderen)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:45 pm
by Zjonbelz
Please give
Flora it's own profile back, it is a separate village within the municipality of Merelbeke. It has it's own villagesign. Coordinates 51.017642N,3.760414E
Missing dots:
Baarle 51.036645N,3.618279E
't Loo (Bergeijk) 51.308887N,5.337381E
Boshoven 51.254717N,5.679245E
Zeelst 51.424313N,5.415745E
Brachterbeek 51.146833,5.906696E
Reutje 51.128684N,6.008749E
Hedikhuizen 51.733992N,5.185289E
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:54 pm
by rlaurenssen
Zjonbelz wrote:Please give
Flora it's own profile back, it is a separate village within the municipality of Merelbeke. It has it's own villagesign. Coordinates 51.017642N,3.760414E
Missing dots:
Baarle 51.036645N,3.618279E
't Loo (Bergeijk) 51.308887N,5.337381E
Boshoven 51.254717N,5.679245E
Zeelst 51.424313N,5.415745E
Brachterbeek 51.146833,5.906696E
Reutje 51.128684N,6.008749E
Hedikhuizen 51.733992N,5.185289E
Baarle has been added to the municipality of Gent, sorry didn't notice the postal code.
Flora is not a village, its a suburb of the gemeente Merelbeke
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_(Merelbeke) so this
wil stay this way.
Also Boshoven has been identified as a suburb of the municipality Weert
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boshoven_(Weert)
The rest of your list has coordinates now and should show up on your Dotmap. I'm really sorry if you lost those two citys from your
list, but a suburb should be merged with the correct City. Villagesigns do not always tell you if it is really a village, a lot of
suburbs, in both the Netherlands and Belguim, have signs at their borders, but can not be identified as a village.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:45 pm
by Tarmo
The dot for Tampere (post code area 33230) is located in the Norwegian Sea due to an error on the coordinates. 61.4996,3.74252 should be 61.4996,23.74252
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:02 pm
by anto989
I inserted this bill but the dot doesn't appear,and should be above the dot of Otranto
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=84314346" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:12 pm
by Wovychamois
These 2 profiles have to be merged:
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=74044" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=74043" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;