Page 140 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:40 pm
by rlaurenssen
Tarmo wrote:The dot for Tampere (post code area 33230) is located in the Norwegian Sea due to an error on the coordinates. 61.4996,3.74252 should be 61.4996,23.74252
Done, also post code 33180 had the same problem.

anto989 wrote:I inserted this bill but the dot doesn't appear,and should be above the dot of Otranto

http://it.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=84314346" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I can't find a village with just the name Alimini. I found Serra Alimini Prima and Serra Alimini Seconda with google maps and two little lakes nearby
which caries the same name. Could you tell me wich one of the villages it is?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:57 pm
by anto989
I received bills there:

http://maps.google.it/maps?f=q&source=s ... 01725&z=19" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

maybe support can edit the location

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:05 am
by Zwedenfan
I've noticed that the coordinates for Wiekevorst are a little bit out of direction: the marked point stands closer to the border with Herenthout than the village-centre of Wiekevorst.

Coordinates like 51° 06' 34" N, 4° 47' 41" E would be better.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:40 pm
by yli
Please don't use a form for co-ordinates like that :wink:

I have changed them to 51.1093 / 4.7942, it looks like the center of Wiekevorst (Dexia bank)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:26 pm
by anto989
anto989 wrote:I received bills there:

http://maps.google.it/maps?f=q&source=s ... 01725&z=19" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

maybe support can edit the location
the dot doesn't still appear

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:35 pm
by greteck
1st point:

I had recently a hit during my vacations in Italy and it seems that the coordinates for Sevegliano are incorrect.

Today coordinates are 45.8876°N ; 13°E. True coordinates should be something like 45.8876°N ; 13.3032°E

2nd point:

Coordinates of Lisle-sur-Tarn are now missing (but existed some days before). Coordinates are 43.851838°N , 1.810119°E

Once solved, these two points should give me two other dots :) Thank you !

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:24 am
by Yelverdack
There are two different cities with the same name in the same city profile.
Could you separate them please ?

It's Estaing, France http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=26156" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The dot is in Estaing, Hautes-Pyrénées, post code 65400, France
But there is another Estaing, Aveyron, postcode 12190, France.

All the registered bills in the two differents cities are in the same city profile.

Thank you.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:23 am
by debemaks
HI guys I spotted some problem relatively at the following city profiles, where the coordinates are missing:

Poveromo http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=118399" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 43.996848 - 10.138409 )
Prarolo http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=128975" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 45.281075 - 8.477463 )
Sheremetyevo Airport http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=141573" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 55.972915 - 37.414769 )
Panorama http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=72891" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 40.585430 - 23.024455 )
Hagar Qim http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144392" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 35.827479 - 14.443374 )
Kemmuna http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144395" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 36.014322 - 14.323575 )
Craiova http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=138888" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.324993 - 23.813961 )
Saint-Pierre-de-Curtille http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=84992" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 45.774964 - 5.807441 )
Vicarello http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=161552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 43.613591 - 6.464780 )
Castiglione Vara http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=16794" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.204313 - 9.818285 )
Casinalbo http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=16435" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.595510 - 10.858972 )
Battifollo http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=167995" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.102104 - 9.943235 )

Thank you very much

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:56 am
by Phaseolus
The administrative divisions for Luxembourg should be available for translations ("districts" and "cantons" in French)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:43 am
by yli
debemaks wrote:HI guys I spotted some problem relatively at the following city profiles, where the coordinates are missing:
...
Thank you very much
Thanks for posting the co-ordinates, all locations have co-ordinates now

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:41 pm
by hmmmmm
missing coordinates for Lampaluoto http://fi.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=170006" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;: 61.636 N, 21.5066 E

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:30 am
by maarsy
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=71900" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; i think this note in a " town " ( i know the place its like 2 streets big with a church in the middle ) should be put together with http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=14220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

normaly i am positive about locations with there own profile but i think this just is a bit to far , if that is worth a profile i can make 20 more of that in mi town

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:28 pm
by rlaurenssen
maarsy wrote:http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=71900 i think this note in a " town " ( i know the place its like 2 streets big with a church in the middle ) should be put together with http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=14220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

normaly i am positive about locations with there own profile but i think this just is a bit to far , if that is worth a profile i can make 20 more of that in mi town
Is this the location: Google Earth?

If so, I agree with you, on the other hand according to wiki it is a hamlet with characteristics of a village :roll: .

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:29 pm
by groentje
Plus, it used to be an independent village, until 1977. Enough reason to keep it apart, for me. Older mergers (such as the merger in 1823 of Bachte and Sint-Maria-Leerne in Bachte-Maria-Leerne, now part of Deinze) I put together.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:52 pm
by maarsy
rlaurenssen wrote:
maarsy wrote:http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=71900 i think this note in a " town " ( i know the place its like 2 streets big with a church in the middle ) should be put together with http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=14220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

normaly i am positive about locations with there own profile but i think this just is a bit to far , if that is worth a profile i can make 20 more of that in mi town
Is this the location: Google Earth?

If so, I agree with you, on the other hand according to wiki it is a hamlet with characteristics of a village :roll: .
thats about it