Page 140 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:40 pm
by rlaurenssen
Tarmo wrote:The dot for Tampere (post code area 33230) is located in the Norwegian Sea due to an error on the coordinates. 61.4996,3.74252 should be 61.4996,23.74252
Done, also post code 33180 had the same problem.
I can't find a village with just the name Alimini. I found Serra Alimini Prima and Serra Alimini Seconda with google maps and two little lakes nearby
which caries the same name. Could you tell me wich one of the villages it is?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:57 pm
by anto989
I received bills there:
http://maps.google.it/maps?f=q&source=s ... 01725&z=19" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
maybe support can edit the location
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:05 am
by Zwedenfan
I've noticed that the coordinates for
Wiekevorst are a little bit out of direction: the marked point stands closer to the border with Herenthout than the village-centre of Wiekevorst.
Coordinates like 51° 06' 34" N, 4° 47' 41" E would be better.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:40 pm
by yli
Please don't use a form for co-ordinates like that
I have changed them to 51.1093 / 4.7942, it looks like the center of Wiekevorst (Dexia bank)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:26 pm
by anto989
the dot doesn't still appear
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:35 pm
by greteck
1st point:
I had recently a
hit during my vacations in Italy and it seems that the coordinates for
Sevegliano are incorrect.
Today coordinates are 45.8876°N ; 13°E. True coordinates should be something like 45.8876°N ; 13.
3032°E
2nd point:
Coordinates of
Lisle-sur-Tarn are now missing (but existed some days before). Coordinates are 43.851838°N , 1.810119°E
Once solved, these two points should give me two other dots

Thank you !
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:24 am
by Yelverdack
There are two different cities with the same name in the same city profile.
Could you separate them please ?
It's Estaing, France
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=26156" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The dot is in Estaing, Hautes-Pyrénées, post code 65400, France
But there is another Estaing, Aveyron, postcode 12190, France.
All the registered bills in the two differents cities are in the same city profile.
Thank you.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:23 am
by debemaks
HI guys I spotted some problem relatively at the following city profiles, where the coordinates are missing:
Poveromo
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=118399" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 43.996848 - 10.138409 )
Prarolo
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=128975" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 45.281075 - 8.477463 )
Sheremetyevo Airport
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=141573" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 55.972915 - 37.414769 )
Panorama
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=72891" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 40.585430 - 23.024455 )
Hagar Qim
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144392" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 35.827479 - 14.443374 )
Kemmuna
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=144395" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 36.014322 - 14.323575 )
Craiova
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=138888" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.324993 - 23.813961 )
Saint-Pierre-de-Curtille
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=84992" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 45.774964 - 5.807441 )
Vicarello
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=161552" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 43.613591 - 6.464780 )
Castiglione Vara
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=16794" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.204313 - 9.818285 )
Casinalbo
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=16435" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.595510 - 10.858972 )
Battifollo
http://it.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=167995" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ( 44.102104 - 9.943235 )
Thank you very much
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:56 am
by Phaseolus
The administrative divisions for Luxembourg should be available for translations ("districts" and "cantons" in French)
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:43 am
by yli
debemaks wrote:HI guys I spotted some problem relatively at the following city profiles, where the coordinates are missing:
...
Thank you very much
Thanks for posting the co-ordinates, all locations have co-ordinates now
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:41 pm
by hmmmmm
missing coordinates for Lampaluoto
http://fi.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=170006" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;: 61.636 N, 21.5066 E
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:30 am
by maarsy
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=71900" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; i think this note in a " town " ( i know the place its like 2 streets big with a church in the middle ) should be put together with
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=14220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
normaly i am positive about locations with there own profile but i think this just is a bit to far , if that is worth a profile i can make 20 more of that in mi town
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:28 pm
by rlaurenssen
Is this the location:
Google Earth?
If so, I agree with you, on the other hand according to wiki it is a hamlet with characteristics of a village

.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:29 pm
by groentje
Plus, it used to be an independent village, until 1977. Enough reason to keep it apart, for me. Older mergers (such as the merger in 1823 of Bachte and Sint-Maria-Leerne in Bachte-Maria-Leerne, now part of Deinze) I put together.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:52 pm
by maarsy
rlaurenssen wrote:
Is this the location:
Google Earth?
If so, I agree with you, on the other hand according to wiki it is a hamlet with characteristics of a village

.
thats about it