Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Concerns? Let us know by posting here.

Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5

User avatar
dserrano5
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Madrid, ES

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by dserrano5 »

Elmo wrote:A few villages in Spain are new to the system:

La Mora, near Tarragona: 41,130° N, 1,346° E;
La Isleta, near Almeria: 36,814° N, 2,052° W;
Caudete de las Fuentes, about 80 km west of Valencia: 39,559° N, 1,279° W.
Sorry for the late answer to this.

I fixed La Isleta and Caudete de las Fuentes some days ago. Didn't do La Mora because there are no less than 5 places with that name in Spain, and I didn't know which one was correct. Now I've seen your post and have added the coordinates.
User avatar
Elmo
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4245
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:16 pm
Location: Leiden (Netherlands)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Elmo »

Thanks!

However, La Isleta and Caudete de las Fuentes don't show up as dots yet.
Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are 'It might have been.' - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
an-148
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 4596
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: summer: Ivanica, BiH ; winter: La Calamine (Liège) BE
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by an-148 »

Sitnica (http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=10" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) is included in municipality Herceg-Novi :wink:
it is the border crossing point on the new toll road from Trebinje (BiH) to Herceg-Novi (MNE): the toll paying station ( where all the bills come from ) is located there, close to the border control station :wink:
http://meine.flugstatistik.de/image/an148.gif" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
dserrano5
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:59 am
Location: Madrid, ES

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by dserrano5 »

Elmo wrote:However, La Isleta and Caudete de las Fuentes don't show up as dots yet.
Odd... their coordinates weren't there - probably my fault. Thanks for letting me know!

Nice signature, BTW ;)
User avatar
R/J
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2300
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:04 pm
Location: Eindhoven & omgeving, Nederland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by R/J »

I hope I can also mention incorrect region-divisions here.

I spotted that Reunion is for some reason located in Baden-Wurttemberg, while it should be in French DOM. Also, Saint-Marie, Reunion is grouped under Other overseas territories of France, while it is of course part of Reunion.
My NIG stats have finally disappeared. My EBTST stats are still available.
User avatar
googlejaps
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by googlejaps »

The profile of the country Vatican city states:
Vatican City consists of 2 Cities.

That's incorrect.
User avatar
Zjonbelz
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Kaulille, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Zjonbelz »

After a trip to some towns in the neighbourhood of Antwerp:

Please split Hoogboom from the profile of Kapellen. This is a separate village, has townsigns too. Probably also Putte (Kapellen) is within the profile of Kapellen, but I didn't enter any notes there.

Please split Maria-ter-Heide from the profile of Brasschaat. This is also a separate village with it's own townsigns.
User avatar
de*lerger
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 5315
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Lies - Terschelling (NL)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by de*lerger »

Timmendorf Strand is placed in the wrong profile (of TimmendorfER Strand).
It should be in the profile of Insel Poel
My map
User avatar
R/J
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2300
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:04 pm
Location: Eindhoven & omgeving, Nederland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by R/J »

Zjonbelz wrote:Probably also Putte (Kapellen) is within the profile of Kapellen, but I didn't enter any notes there.
Putte (Kapellen) is already seperate. No need to change that.

This is something I've posted in a thread in the Dutch forum:
Valkenburg aan de Geul -> Valkenburg (Limburg)
Valkenburg (Zh) -> Valkenburg (Zuid-Holland)
Please change it as the first profile now has the name of the municipality, the main location in that municipality always has had the 'short' name. The second is to make it more clear.
My NIG stats have finally disappeared. My EBTST stats are still available.
User avatar
Wovychamois
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: 38068 Rovereto (TN) - Italy

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Wovychamois »

Please add the dot for:
Drena: http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=171699" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Latitudine: 45.9711 Longitudine: 10.9469

Please amend the dot for:
Tiarno di Sopra: http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=104776" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Latitudine: 45.8908 Longitudine: 10.6728
San lorenzo in Banale: http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=147424" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Latitudine: 46.0781 Longitudine: 10.9081

Thanks.
:flag-it: Alpca 10105 e Nunavut :flag-it: - 38068 Rovereto (TN)

:flag-eu: My EBT-profile - since 2nd September 2007
EBTCheck statistics - last updated 12th September 2020
User avatar
Wovychamois
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: 38068 Rovereto (TN) - Italy

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Wovychamois »

I'd like to ask a question.

The dot we see in the small map on the right of every location profile is the same that we can find if we use the Google dotmap when we click on EBT-menu than Locations?

I'm asking this because the are some places from where I have notes, shown in the city profile, but not shown in the Google dotmap.
For example these 2 are missing on Google Dotmap:
Fondo Grande: http://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=28174" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Lodrone: http://en.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=55947" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks to let me know.
:flag-it: Alpca 10105 e Nunavut :flag-it: - 38068 Rovereto (TN)

:flag-eu: My EBT-profile - since 2nd September 2007
EBTCheck statistics - last updated 12th September 2020
User avatar
Wovychamois
Euro-Expert in Training
Euro-Expert in Training
Posts: 348
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Location: 38068 Rovereto (TN) - Italy

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by Wovychamois »

As far as I know in Singapore country there is only Singapore-city (and its airport).

So please merge: Bencoolen http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=161469" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; to Singapore http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=92207" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

Bencoolen is only a street: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bencoolen_Street" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:flag-it: Alpca 10105 e Nunavut :flag-it: - 38068 Rovereto (TN)

:flag-eu: My EBT-profile - since 2nd September 2007
EBTCheck statistics - last updated 12th September 2020
User avatar
eddydevries
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20032
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Rotterdam (NL)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by eddydevries »

Please merge the profile of Zeebrugge (Brugge) into the already existing profile of Zeebrugge.

There's only one Zeebrugge in Belgium, so the addition of "(Brugge)" isn't neccesary.
Eddy - Rotterdam - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.

Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
User avatar
R/J
Euro-Master
Euro-Master
Posts: 2300
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 12:04 pm
Location: Eindhoven & omgeving, Nederland

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by R/J »

Berg en Dal is actually located in two municipalities. Most of it, with postcodes starting 6571 is indeed in the municipality of Groesbeek, but entries with postcodes starting 6572 are located in the municipality of Ubbergen. These are very few locations in that last part (only 25 possible postcodes...), but quite a few notes and hits apperently.
My NIG stats have finally disappeared. My EBTST stats are still available.
User avatar
eddydevries
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20032
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:49 am
Location: Rotterdam (NL)
Contact:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Post by eddydevries »

Someone has entered notes with the "city name" of 3527vp.
Actually this is just the postcode.

Please merge it in the cityprofile of Utrecht.
Eddy - Rotterdam - NL
weblog - EBT-stats 24-05-2013 - hits: 1742 +59 triples +1 quadruple = 1802.

Facebook-profile + Geocaching + postcrossing
Post Reply

Return to “Feedback and Development”