EuroBillTracker

CarlosManta wrote:I agree. It is for me annoying the amount of localities called "aiport" ou "flughafen".

Just for the record, there are no less than 10 profiles that match the spanish "aeropuerto". In the spanish EBT community there's a general disagreement about the fact that airports have their own "city" profiles.

bhoeyb wrote: Please, add an url of a note, not the city profile. It makes entering coords a lot easier. Thanks!

Ok! Here they are:

Comano Terme in Trento, Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, Italia.
Coordinates: 46.042685 N, 10.885941 E

Paratico in Brescia, Lombardia, Italia
Coordinates: 45.654964 N, 9.956982 E

Rivalta Scrivia in Alessandria, Piemonte, Italia.
Coordinates: 44.846787 N,8.814017 E

Montesardo
Coordinates: 39.877500 N, 18.341278 E

Mel
Coordinates: 46.064542 N, 12.088101 E

Mensa in Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, Italia
Coordinates: 44.222445 N, 12.241884 E

Thanks!

Could someone split two neighbours cities with the same name and almost at the same place but on the other side of the border.

The swiss city Saint-Gingolph Zip Code 1898 coordinates 46.3932 6.8049
is now subsumed but the french city Saint-Gingolph Zip code 74500 coordinates 46.3914 6.8016
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=84084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

but they are two different cities

Thanks

mistake in the country (should be the Netherlands) : http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=88631875" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Yelverdack wrote:Could someone split two neighbours cities with the same name and almost at the same place but on the other side of the border.

The swiss city Saint-Gingolph Zip Code 1898 coordinates 46.3932 6.8049
is now subsumed but the french city Saint-Gingolph Zip code 74500 coordinates 46.3914 6.8016
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=84084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

but they are two different cities

Thanks

Could someone do something for that ? That's still not fixed yet.

Thanks.

Yelverdack wrote:

Yelverdack wrote:Could someone split two neighbours cities with the same name and almost at the same place but on the other side of the border.

The swiss city Saint-Gingolph Zip Code 1898 coordinates 46.3932 6.8049
is now subsumed but the french city Saint-Gingolph Zip code 74500 coordinates 46.3914 6.8016
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=84084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

but they are two different cities

Thanks

Could someone do something for that ? That's still not fixed yet.

Thanks.

done

ravestorm wrote:

Yelverdack wrote:

Yelverdack wrote:Could someone split two neighbours cities with the same name and almost at the same place but on the other side of the border.

The swiss city Saint-Gingolph Zip Code 1898 coordinates 46.3932 6.8049
is now subsumed but the french city Saint-Gingolph Zip code 74500 coordinates 46.3914 6.8016
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=84084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

but they are two different cities

Thanks

Could someone do something for that ? That's still not fixed yet.

Thanks.

done

Thanks a lot, ravestorm

The system does not always find the correct city from the data introduced by users, when entering new notes. I understand that this is difficult under certain situations and that in some cases the best is to create a new city and wait for manual corrections from plotters.

But "recently" it seems the system creates new cities when it could easily find an existing city with the same name and the same postal code. A recent example: someone enters a note in the location Zambujal (2785-691, Portugal) when the following cities with the name Zambujal where defined:

Zambujal (ID 124655 < Loures < Lisboa)
* Zambujal (2660-431, Portugal)

Zambujal (ID 124335 < Cantanhede < Coimbra)
* Zambujal (3060-115, Portugal)

Zambujal (ID 129353 < Caldas da Rainha < Leiria)
* Zambujal (2500-389, Portugal)

Zambujal (ID 132340 < Mafra < Lisboa)
* Zambujal (2640, Portugal)

Zambujal (ID 153359 < Cascais < Lisboa)
* Zambujal (2785-423, Portugal)
* Zambujal (2785-695, Portugal)

My question is why does the system create a new city for the new location, when he could easily identify the correct city, Zambujal, ID 153359, from the beginning of the postal code (2785)? Maybe the system does not like the portuguese postal codes xxxx-xxx...

Shouldn't Poix-Saint-Hubert be merged with Hatrival?

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint-Hubert_(Belgi" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;ë)#Kernen

Well, it's possible, but not necessary to me. It's clearly a distinct place, closer to other villages then Hatrival.

It's not a policy to merge villages into (part)municipalities in Belgium

yli wrote:It's not a policy to merge villages into (part)municipalities in Belgium

In that case, can someone take another look at the profile of Comblain-Fairon? This is the name of the deelgemeente, which consists of two villages, Comblain-la-Tour (separate profile exists) and Fairon (one of my notes). The current Comblain-Fairon profile came into existence somewhere between me entering notes in Fairon and now. One user entered notes named Comblain-Fairon, the third visitor used Fairon.

Two things can be done:
1 Assume that Comblain-Fairon means the village of Fairon and rename the profile to Fairon.
2 Assume that you cannot know what was meant with Comblain-Farion and split the profile.

Rafz http://it.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=171861" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; has to be put in Zurich Canton

Again: Some spelling mistakes are so obvious that there can't be any discussion what city is ment

Zjonbelz wrote:Friendly reminder:

Zjonbelz wrote:Have been looking through all cityprofiles in Limburg and found some errors:

Please merge Zichem Zussen Bolder and Bolder into Zichen-Zussen-Bolder
Reimst is a misspelling of Riemst
Vorsen is the same as Vorsen
The user who entered notes from Bovelingen-Heers probably ment Mechelen-Bovelingen
Opglabbeek-louwel = Louwel
Opglabeekis a misspelling of Opglabbeek
Ellikom -Meeuwen = Ellikom
Hern = Sint-Huibrechts-Hern
Please remane Niel bij as in the official name Niel-bij-As.
Maaeik is a misspelling of Maaseik
Rekum is a misspelling of Rekem
Herk = Herk-de-Stad
Sint-truiden (ordingen) = Ordingen
Zwartberg-Genk = Zwartberg
Hechtel-Eksel can be easily split into Hechtel (postcode 3940) and Eksel (postcode 3941)
Korspel-Beverlo = Korspel
Munster bilzen = Munsterbilzen

Zjonbelz wrote:After a trip to some towns in the neighbourhood of Antwerp:

Please split Hoogboom from the profile of Kapellen. This is a separate village, has townsigns too.

Please split Maria-ter-Heide from the profile of Brasschaat. This is also a separate village with it's own townsigns.

corrected all above in last posting