Page 154 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:47 am
by eddydevries
Please change the merging of Millingen (47495) from the profile of Rees to Rheinberg.
The merging of Millingen (46459) is correct.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:11 am
by vermeer
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=144555" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Can this "town" merge in Groningen?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 8:03 am
by eddydevries
I understand, not all postcodes in the Netherlands has its own coordinates.
But I've a question:

I've entered notes in Hazerswoude-Dorp which gave two "locations". Those are rather near to each other, but I've also entered notes in Hazerswoude-Dorp at a postcode which is lying further away from the other locations.

Will you change the coordinates of the postcode 2391 PX to N 52.077238, E 4.626768?
(I don't know if someone has entered notes as postcode 2391PX, but if so: please change it's coordinates, too)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:04 pm
by Phaseolus
Please merge the profiles of Cergy-Pontoise )http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=17099) and Cergy Saint-Christophe (http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=169749" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) into the profile of Cergy (http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=17097" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)

thank you

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:20 pm
by joergb30
Please correct the coordinates for Boumalne Dadès (Morocco).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:06 pm
by yli
joergb30 wrote:Please correct the coordinates for Boumalne Dadès (Morocco).
I am sorry, due to wrong information on wikipédia the dot ended up somewhere in the ocean north of Spain and Portugal.
Hopefully these co-ordinates of wikipedia are better :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:30 am
by Crossmaster
.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:47 am
by jonman
the airport leipzig-halle is actually in the community of schkeuditz, so please merge the profiles.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:37 am
by Tarmo
jonman wrote:the airport leipzig-halle is actually in the community of schkeuditz, so please merge the profiles.
And the same thing should be done with Helsinki airport (Helsinki-Vantaan lentoasema (airport)) that is located in the city of Vantaa.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:19 pm
by R/J
Is there not a recent policy that international airports should always have their own profile?

But now the reason for posting:
I noticed the Cyrpiot hit for today, and the first enty, Episkopi, gave me a profile in the United Kingdom.
Wikipedia mentions that this village lies partly in the UK sovereign base on Cyprus, partly in the country Cyprus. Google maps puts it mostly in Cyprus. The only person with hits there uses the Cypriot flag for entering. So I wonder why this profile is part of the UK?

The profile: http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/profile/?city=139749" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The hit: http://nl.eurobilltracker.eu/notes/?id=94146361" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (possibly pointing to the wrong end.)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:16 pm
by eddydevries
Please split this profile into its own.

Or, if it has to be merged, it's merged with the wrong profile: then it should be merged with Eynatten, because it has the same postcode (but it's laying quite a distance from there too).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:39 pm
by CarlosManta
R/J wrote:Is there not a recent policy that international airports should always have their own profile?
I thought the rule is exactly the opposite, since airports are not cities, but are located in or near cities, or villages.

A clarification would be really useful.

Another issue is petrol stations on motorways, or toll booths. Should they have their own profiles as well?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:52 pm
by Phaseolus
CarlosManta wrote: Another issue is petrol stations on motorways, or toll booths. Should they have their own profiles as well?
and what about my local bakery, or the post office, or the railway station...
:mrgreen:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:16 pm
by ravestorm
CarlosManta wrote:
R/J wrote:Is there not a recent policy that international airports should always have their own profile?
I thought the rule is exactly the opposite, since airports are not cities, but are located in or near cities, or villages.

A clarification would be really useful.

Another issue is petrol stations on motorways, or toll booths. Should they have their own profiles as well?
i'm against the practice to give airports their own profiles because they aren't real towns and they belong to some real location.
So, imho, best way to track from airports is inserting notes from ocatione where they belong and writing in the comment field "got at XYZ airport"

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:56 pm
by groentje
I don't mind if people enter notes in Brussels Airport, that profile is already merged with Zaventem, I believe.