Page 175 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:22 pm
by an-148
request to the team:

please change the flag in front of "Barcelone" on this hit from the belgian one to the spanish one: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=87543142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:55 pm
by googlejaps
an-148 wrote:request to the team:

please change the flag in front of "Barcelone" on this hit from the belgian one to the spanish one: https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=87543142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
There's no team that can make these kind of changes to someones note data. Your best hope is to alert your hitpartner to change the note him/herself.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:54 pm
by an-148
hum !!

he only registered a few notes and is inactive since 22.05.2011 :cry:
and.... so much users (with low interrest and a few notes) don't even know that they can edit a note !!
additionally, there is no way to contact him !!


this schould be a priority in Avij & Nerzhul "to do list",: having the location moderators able to correct those simple but disturbing errors !!

because:
- all visitors of the site who see that kind of hits think the ebt-website is not serious ...... and go their way without joining !
- all the stats of users (like me?) who spend hours and hours in ebt are uncorrect: instead of 7 Spain hits, I have still 6 :evil: :evil:
- it should not be so difficult to implement this function in the software, I guess !

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:27 pm
by _Mr.Rofl_
Please make a new city profile Stroe part of municipality ImageWieringen

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:42 am
by sen-chuan
Please, be so kind to correct this place into Campodipietra. Dot is correct. Thank you.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:53 pm
by Mullams
Katwijk, 2223 LG (http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=100867046" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) is a place in the Netherlands and not Suriname. Could you correct it, please?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:22 pm
by sarebt
Please move or split (whatever is applicable) :flag-si: Dobravlje.
There is Dobravlje 5263 (most if not all the notes are probably from here) and there is Dobravlje 6210 (where the dot is now)
Suggested coordinates Dobravlje 5263 : 45,88472N 13,84056E
Thanks!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:22 pm
by yli
There are no notes entered in 6210 Dobravlje, so I changed the co-ordinates (and the municipality)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:44 pm
by Evert
http://fi.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=104362272" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Could you add the dot for Varbola, :flag-ee: please? 8)

Varbola is a village in Märjamaa Parish, Rapla County in western Estonia.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:55 pm
by an-148
Astenet 4711 , municipality of Lontzen, Province Liège, Belgium
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=183257" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

location: 50.686534,6.035564

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:04 pm
by Ord€p
This note is in Spain not Estonia
This note is in Galiza not in Canaries Islands.

Missing dot: San Marcos: from Google
Missing dot: A Casalonga: from Google

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:29 pm
by an-148
St Ives, Cornwall, Englan, UK
50.212092,-5.480511
(https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=105070172" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:57 am
by Elmo
The Spanish zipcode 10340 belongs to Castañar de Ibor in Cáceres in Extremadura. The coördinates are 39.62797, -5.41653. It seems La Mata is a 'sub-region' in Cáceres with villages such as Navalmoral de la Mata and Peraleda de la Mata.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:40 am
by roberdy
Elmo wrote:The Spanish zipcode 10340 belongs to Castañar de Ibor in Cáceres in Extremadura. The coördinates are 39.62797, -5.41653. It seems La Mata is a 'sub-region' in Cáceres with villages such as Navalmoral de la Mata and Peraleda de la Mata.
The most probable place called "La Mata" (engl. The Bush - a very common place/area name in Spain) in that area should be this: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Mata_%28Moraleja%29" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; -> 10840

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:22 am
by CNGL
Elmo wrote:The Spanish zipcode 10340 belongs to Castañar de Ibor in Cáceres in Extremadura. The coördinates are 39.62797, -5.41653. It seems La Mata is a 'sub-region' in Cáceres with villages such as Navalmoral de la Mata and Peraleda de la Mata.
Yeah. The town called La Mata where it's now the dot has the zipcode 03188 and belongs to Torrevieja, Alicante province, Valencian comunity. And as you stated, 10340 is Castañar de Ibor.