And your Caps Lock was stuck I guess
http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... id=7618775
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
yes ..Crazy Bob wrote:@ FVS
And your Caps Lock was stuck I guess
http://www.eurobilltracker.eu/index.php ... id=7618775

Tintin, you really don't need to announce that here. Entering brand new notes, even with consecutive serials, is common and not in the least suspicious.tintin6971 wrote:Hi,
I just come back from my ATM with a serieof 14 brand new bills (20 euro) just as printed and 2 ten in the same condition. They are not fake, I keep a scan of it !
This might go to the wrong location topic.hjkmans wrote:Since I'm preparing to collect some notes and 'dots' in Central Asia I found this one quite suspicious. Why? Baku is the capital of Azerbaijan

Yes. Writing that is important, because that way people are able to prove theirselves unguilty, which is very important with this thread.. :(Klazu wrote: To the matter regarding brand new notes: remember to enter something in the comment field like "atm" or "brand new" so it's easy for us to notice that those look OK. More information is always better. :idea:

OK thanks I just do that after reading this threadNerzhul wrote:Tintin, you really don't need to announce that here. Entering brand new notes, even with consecutive serials, is common and not in the least suspicious.tintin6971 wrote:Hi,
I just come back from my ATM with a serieof 14 brand new bills (20 euro) just as printed and 2 ten in the same condition. They are not fake, I keep a scan of it !
Don't let the witch hunt that this thread has become at times scare you. Nobody needs to justify the notes he's about to enter.
-M
I think it would be totally unnecessary moderation. If the hit was, as you said yourself, not a fake or unintentional, there is no reason to modarate it. And can you speak for the other person as well? Would he want this hit to be moderated?Marius wrote:Please moderate this hit since it's not interesting.
(Not a fake, unintentional, but still not interesting...)

Because I didn't want to insert that note. It was a mistake (so, not intentional and not a fake). Is this enough?imleH wrote:I think it would be totally unnecessary moderation. If the hit was, as you said yourself, not a fake or unintentional, there is no reason to modarate it. And can you speak for the other person as well? Would he want this hit to be moderated?Marius wrote:Please moderate this hit since it's not interesting.
(Not a fake, unintentional, but still not interesting...)

I think the moderators can arrange that for you, but like imleH I wonder if the other person agrees with moderation too. It is his first hit, i think it would be very sad for him to lose his first hit in this way. Unless he has not problem with it of course.Marius wrote:Because I didn't want to insert that note. It was a mistake (so, not intentional and not a fake). Is this enough?
I'd prefer to delete that note from my list, but this is not possible. Could you?
Thanks

Is it necessary that he agrees? O_odaniellez wrote:I think the moderators can arrange that for you, but like imleH I wonder if the other person agrees with moderation too. It is his first hit, i think it would be very sad for him to lose his first hit in this way. Unless he has not problem with it of course.Marius wrote:Because I didn't want to insert that note. It was a mistake (so, not intentional and not a fake). Is this enough?
I'd prefer to delete that note from my list, but this is not possible. Could you?
Thanks