EuroBillTracker

My notes entered here are placed in the cityprofile of Stockum-Püschen.

Actually Ihaven't been in "Westerwaldkreis, Rheinland-Pfalz", but in "kreis Unna, Nordrhein-Westfalen".

Coordinates are: 51.673066,7.692989

Antigua, Guatemala (https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=108472870" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
14.559078,-90.737214

virgin gorda (https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=184719" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
18.451115,-64.435701

A bit of touring brought me in many wonderful places, among them the following two that were new to EBT:

Kačiče-Pared, Divača - 45,64278N 13,96861E
Kazlje, Sežana - 45,76278N 13,90583E

Some other stuff I came across:

Jezero 1352 (e.g. this note)
Zgornje Stranje 1242 (e.g. this note)
are getting a correct placemarker for "cities" but no marker under "locations".

Stahovica 1242 (e.g. this note) has a marker for "cities" that is quite out of the way, the one under "locations" is ok, probably an outlayer in the coordinates?

The following profiles should be combined :
Zgornje Jarše and Zgornje Jarše
Rovišče and Rovišče

Thanks as ever!

sarebt wrote: Kačiče-Pared, Divača - 45,64278N 13,96861E
Kazlje, Sežana - 45,76278N 13,90583E

Done

sarebt wrote: Jezero 1352 (e.g. this note)
Zgornje Stranje 1242 (e.g. this note)
are getting a correct placemarker for "cities" but no marker under "locations".

I haven't changed anything because I am not an expert of Slovenia topography.
Jezero pri Podpeči (1352) has been given co-ordinates (45.97,14.4361) - Jezero (1352) doesn't have it's own co-ordanites and has the co-ordinates of the other location (postalcode) combination in the cityprofile.
Zgornje Stranje (1424) has been given co-ordinates (46.2539,14.6021) - Zgornje Stranje (1242) doensn't have it's own co-ordinates.

sarebt wrote: Stahovica 1242 (e.g. this note) has a marker for "cities" that is quite out of the way, the one under "locations" is ok, probably an outlayer in the coordinates?

The average co-ordinates of the cityprofile are (46.3010,14.6135) - due to the fact that it consists of the following locations (postalcode + co-ordinates) :

Kamniško sedlo (1242 = 46.3592,14.5974)
Stahovica (1242 = 46.2696, 14.6092)
Sveti Primož (1242 = 46.2743, 14.6338)
...and Stahovica (1241 without co-ordinates)

sarebt wrote: The following profiles should be combined :
Zgornje Jarše and Zgornje Jarše
Rovišče and Rovišče

Done

yli wrote: I haven't changed anything because I am not an expert of Slovenia topography.
Jezero pri Podpeči (1352) has been given co-ordinates (45.97,14.4361) - Jezero (1352) doesn't have it's own co-ordanites and has the co-ordinates of the other location (postalcode) combination in the cityprofile.

Ok, Slovene topography aside for now. For me this brings up two questions about the system:
1. What is the criterium that a location gets its own coordinates?
2. If a location gets coordinates from another location, shouldn't it then be shown with those coordinates in the dotmap? (in other words: the fact that I don't see a marker for location Jezero 1352 is that a bug or a feature?)

I have only a humble opinion.

1. I don't give (or erase) co-ordinates of locations with spelling mistakes or impossible postalcodes.

In The Netherlands we have an impossible postalcode system (around 8 houses share a postalcode like 1111 XX or 1111XX), so it's a huge job to get all combinations with co-ordinates. If a see a new dutch combination (location + postalcode) I never bother to give it co-ordinates.
2. No idea

fair enough.
In that case the following notes should be relevant :

Kamniško Sedlo (because it is here) should go under Kamniška Bistrica.
Sveti Primož (here) is officially part of Črna pri Kamniku, but that doesn't have a profile (yet).

The official postal code of Zgornje Stranje is 1242. See also: http://v1.geopedia.si/#T105_L256_F157_s12_b4_vF" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. The postalcode 1424 doesn't seem to exist at all in Slovenia.

Please add the coordinates for Brje pri Komnu: 45.784608, 13.717492

6997 MORMONT (50.327491,5.593014)
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=109185626" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
... and maybe some little e-mail to the second user, asking for full names

one of mine, that time

Bad Feilnbach-Au (D-83075) Bavaria, Germany
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=109256490" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; => 47.808024,12.018857

and another one:
Pang (village near Rosenhein, Bavaria, Germany)
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=109284909" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
47.824191,12.092292

an-148 wrote:one of mine, that time

Bad Feilnbach-Au (D-83075) Bavaria, Germany
http://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=109256490" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; => 47.808024,12.018857

done

an-148 wrote:and another one:
Pang (village near Rosenhein, Bavaria, Germany)
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=109284909" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
47.824191,12.092292

and done

Danke

Please move 61197 Staden (note) to 61197 Florstadt
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staden_(Florstadt)
Thank you - tigerpranke