Page 192 of 343
Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:13 pm
by Jackgaillard
Maarsy entered 21 notes (within
this one) in a city named
Honschoote postal code 59112
I think he made mistake according to
wikipedia the city name is in fact
Hondschoote with postal code : 59122 and coordinate :
50° 58′ 49″ N 2° 35′ 10″ E
please could you merge the two places
Jack
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:00 pm
by an-148
some new locations (I've put the coordinates in the comment

)
Flag for Hongrie Nádasd :
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118077144" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Flag for Croatie Janjce :
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118076100" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Flag for Croatie Jacenice :
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118075772" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:50 am
by Elmo
This one should be merged with
Janjče.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:47 am
by an-148
Elmo wrote:
This one should be merged with
Janjče.
oh, yes, of course: I saw both way of writing during research
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 2:37 pm
by bhoeyb
bzajc wrote:bzajc wrote:Please add
Kruševo. Coordinates 41.368,21.248
A little reminder.

Please add a link to the note, not the city profile ... also a little reminder.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:28 pm
by bzajc
http://si.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=116904806" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Kruševo note.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:20 pm
by jonman
could
this bill from

99880 hörsel get coordinates? e.g. lat=:50.9206;long=:10.5846
could
this bill from

1001 tunis get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.8065;long=:10.1813
could
this bill from

2035 tunis carthage airport get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.8477;long=:10.2173
could
this city profile of

tunis carthage airport be attached to the governorate of
ariana / أريانة? (source:
http://www.poste.tn/codes.php, search for ariana, la soukra, aeroport tunis carthage)
thanks a lot in advance

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:33 am
by helloggs
1400 Belem
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117720526" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is located south of Lissabon: 88.7, -9.21
2900 Portinho da Arrabida
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207310" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.47, -8.99
2970 Azoia
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207306" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.4316, -9.1848
7005 Evora
http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117459868" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is displaced, should be: 88.5715, -7.9086
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:49 am
by Castanhola
Belém is part of the city of Lisboa. You should use
Lisboa as city name. And the correct coordinates for 1400-206 (Praça Império) are 38.696082,-9.20605 (already defined in EBT).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:56 am
by helloggs
OK, thanks. Scratch that.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:14 am
by Castanhola
The correct ZIP code is
2925-378. You also forgot the accent on the city name:
Portinho da Arrábida. Your coordinates are nor correct.The correct ones are 38.472062,-8.986233 (already defined on EBT).
The correct coordinates are now defined (38.430585,-9.187806). You forgot the accent on
Azóia.
An error of about 20 km. Thank you. The coordinates are now corrected (but for the good ones

).
The correct city name is
Évora (you forgot the accent).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:35 pm
by jonman
could
this bill from

1000 tunis get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.7993;long=:10.1756
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:35 am
by eddydevries
I've entered 2 notes from a city, not plotted yet (there was already a profile, but it was written not clearly).
Because of this, I've these questions:
- Please add the coordinates of this note: North 51.549538, East 3.59386 (it's the middle of the shopping street);
- Add this city profile in the citymanager into the municipality of Veere;
- Merge this profile into this one;
- To see the difference between the two profiles, please change the name of this profile into Serooskerke (Schouwen-Duiveland).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:08 am
by eddydevries
And here another question:
Te city profile of
Meliskerke is (in city manager) asigned to the municipality of
Middelburg, but in fact: it belongs to the municipality of
Veere (
link).
So please change it in the city manager.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:43 pm
by de*lerger
de*lerger wrote:The notes I entered in
Amilly (postalcode 28300, departement Eure-et-Loire, just west of Chartres) got mixed up with the profile of a different Amilly (postalcode 45200, departement Loiret). Please create a new profile, coordinates 48,4424N, 1,3951E
"My" Amilly is still located on the wrong spot.