Page 192 of 343

Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:13 pm
by Jackgaillard
Maarsy entered 21 notes (within this one) in a city named Honschoote postal code 59112
I think he made mistake according to wikipedia the city name is in fact Hondschoote with postal code : 59122 and coordinate : 50° 58′ 49″ N 2° 35′ 10″ E
please could you merge the two places
Jack

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:00 pm
by an-148
some new locations (I've put the coordinates in the comment :wink: )
Flag for Hongrie Nádasd : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118077144" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Flag for Croatie Janjce : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118076100" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Flag for Croatie Jacenice : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118075772" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:50 am
by Elmo
an-148 wrote:Flag for Croatie Janjce : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118076100" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This one should be merged with Janjče.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:47 am
by an-148
Elmo wrote:
an-148 wrote:Flag for Croatie Janjce : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118076100" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This one should be merged with Janjče.
oh, yes, of course: I saw both way of writing during research

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 2:37 pm
by bhoeyb
bzajc wrote:
bzajc wrote:Please add Kruševo. Coordinates 41.368,21.248
A little reminder. :wink:
Please add a link to the note, not the city profile ... also a little reminder.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:28 pm
by bzajc
http://si.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=116904806" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Kruševo note.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:20 pm
by jonman
could this bill from :flag-de: 99880 hörsel get coordinates? e.g. lat=:50.9206;long=:10.5846

could this bill from Image 1001 tunis get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.8065;long=:10.1813

could this bill from Image 2035 tunis carthage airport get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.8477;long=:10.2173

could this city profile of Image tunis carthage airport be attached to the governorate of ariana / أريانة? (source: http://www.poste.tn/codes.php, search for ariana, la soukra, aeroport tunis carthage)

thanks a lot in advance :wink:

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:33 am
by helloggs
1400 Belem http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117720526" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is located south of Lissabon: 88.7, -9.21

2900 Portinho da Arrabida http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207310" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.47, -8.99

2970 Azoia http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207306" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.4316, -9.1848

7005 Evora http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117459868" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is displaced, should be: 88.5715, -7.9086

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:49 am
by Castanhola
helloggs wrote:1400 Belem http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117720526" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is located south of Lissabon: 88.7, -9.21
Belém is part of the city of Lisboa. You should use Lisboa as city name. And the correct coordinates for 1400-206 (Praça Império) are 38.696082,-9.20605 (already defined in EBT).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:56 am
by helloggs
OK, thanks. Scratch that.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:14 am
by Castanhola
helloggs wrote:2900 Portinho da Arrabida http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207310" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.47, -8.99
The correct ZIP code is 2925-378. You also forgot the accent on the city name: Portinho da Arrábida. Your coordinates are nor correct.The correct ones are 38.472062,-8.986233 (already defined on EBT).
helloggs wrote:2970 Azoia http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118207306" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; does not yet exist on EBT: 88.4316, -9.1848
The correct coordinates are now defined (38.430585,-9.187806). You forgot the accent on Azóia.
helloggs wrote:7005 Evora http://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=117459868" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is displaced, should be: 88.5715, -7.9086
An error of about 20 km. Thank you. The coordinates are now corrected (but for the good ones :wink: ).
The correct city name is Évora (you forgot the accent).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:35 pm
by jonman
jonman wrote:...
could this bill from Image 1001 tunis get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.8065;long=:10.1813
...
could this city profile of Image tunis carthage airport be attached to the governorate of ariana / أريانة? (source: http://www.poste.tn/codes.php, search for ariana, la soukra, aeroport tunis carthage)

thanks a lot in advance :wink:
could this bill from Image 1000 tunis get coordinates? e.g. lat=:36.7993;long=:10.1756

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:35 am
by eddydevries
I've entered 2 notes from a city, not plotted yet (there was already a profile, but it was written not clearly).
Because of this, I've these questions:
  1. Please add the coordinates of this note: North 51.549538, East 3.59386 (it's the middle of the shopping street);
  2. Add this city profile in the citymanager into the municipality of Veere;
  3. Merge this profile into this one;
  4. To see the difference between the two profiles, please change the name of this profile into Serooskerke (Schouwen-Duiveland).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:08 am
by eddydevries
And here another question:
Te city profile of Meliskerke is (in city manager) asigned to the municipality of Middelburg, but in fact: it belongs to the municipality of Veere (link).
So please change it in the city manager.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:43 pm
by de*lerger
de*lerger wrote:The notes I entered in Amilly (postalcode 28300, departement Eure-et-Loire, just west of Chartres) got mixed up with the profile of a different Amilly (postalcode 45200, departement Loiret). Please create a new profile, coordinates 48,4424N, 1,3951E
"My" Amilly is still located on the wrong spot.