The story is that... it is scheduled for the coming decade. The Convention on Europe works on writing a constitution for 2004, before the enlargment.BossaNova wrote:I don't believe, and don't want an European Federation, at least not in the next 20-50 years.. that would be moving too fast.. and probably it wouldn't last much..
The problem is that nobody cares except the Convention. So, everybody feels all happens in Brussels without any debate, which is wrong.
It started with the treaties of Maastricht (92) and Amsterdam (98?)...BossaNova wrote: I don't think we're ready for a common Foreign politics, remember in the echelon for example.. there are many different interests..
I agree with a common european policy for important crisis, such as the Middle East. Each country alone has no more influence. There are peoples which could benefit from a single european voice.
Moreover, for the moment, Europe gives billions of euros to humanitarian causes, but has nothing to say...
Of courses, there are different interests, but there are also common interest we could fight for all together.
BossaNova wrote: I would like to see a common university system however (well, looks like I tottaly disagree with Pinguino)
and with me!
I prefer education and culture to remain "national".
BossaNova wrote: and also a common tax system!
It's on the agenda of the danish presidency.
Not "the USE"... but a different European Union.BossaNova wrote: but United States of Europe, no thanks, too danger!
BN![]()
BossaNova wrote: PS: and I'm sure that portuguese wouldn't accept that in referendum.. and probably the majority of the countries..
I don't know... if our leaders take the time to explain really what it is about, as it was in 1992 in France, for the Maastricht treaty.



