EuroBillTracker

vermeer wrote:Zuidzijde > http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129110336" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; > North 51.781369 and East 4.365048
Nieuwenhoorn > http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129109957" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; > North 51.855271 and East 4.142736
Zandberg (Zeeland) > http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129076370" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; > North 51.30716 and East 4.10154
Scheldevaartshoek > http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129075961" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; > North 51.322486 and East 4.078825
Roverberg > http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129075854" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; > North 51.340358 and East 4.069008

done.

I think that municipality information of Šilo, Croatia is currently incorrect. According to the Wikipedia article about Šilo, it lies in Dobrinj municipality, not Krk municipality.

romanm wrote:I think that municipality information of Šilo, Croatia is currently incorrect. According to the Wikipedia article about Šilo, it lies in Dobrinj municipality, not Krk municipality.

Also in an official source (municipality's website): http://www.dobrinj.hr/index_eng.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Schmölln https://fi.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=128352958" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dot is in correct position but the profile is wrong Schmölln. This Schmölln is part of city of Randowtal (According to Deutsche Post)

romanm wrote:I think that municipality information of Šilo, Croatia is currently incorrect. According to the Wikipedia article about Šilo, it lies in Dobrinj municipality, not Krk municipality.

aplfi wrote:Schmölln https://fi.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=128352958" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dot is in correct position but the profile is wrong Schmölln. This Schmölln is part of city of Randowtal (According to Deutsche Post)

Both changed now.

tigerpranke wrote:

aplfi wrote:Schmölln https://fi.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=128352958" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dot is in correct position but the profile is wrong Schmölln. This Schmölln is part of city of Randowtal (According to Deutsche Post)

Both changed now.

That was fast!
Thank You!

if someone could change the city when we clic on "Soignes (Casteau) : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129280930" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, EBT make this city : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=92765" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; but this isn't the correct city. It change with this city : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=16509" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

opalon wrote:if someone could change the city when we clic on "Soignes (Casteau) : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=129280930" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, EBT make this city : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=92765" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; but this isn't the correct city. It change with this city : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=16509" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You're right. It's changed now.

Ostermarch 53.633333, 7.233333

tigerpranke wrote:

romanm wrote:I think that municipality information of Šilo, Croatia is currently incorrect. According to the Wikipedia article about Šilo, it lies in Dobrinj municipality, not Krk municipality.

Both changed now.

Thank you! I have a few more, from my recent vacations:

• Čižići (sample note) - 45.1576 N 14.5961 E
• Klimno (sample note) - 45.1577 N 14.6227 E
• Soline (sample note) - 45.1487 N 14.6066 E
• Škrila (sample note) - 44.9663 N 14.6755 E
• Sveti Vid (sample note) - 45.1273 N 14.5426 E - it should also be renamed to "Sveti Vid - Miholjice" with "Sveti Vid" (the one with the postal number 51511) as a synonym
• Kraljevica (sample note) - 45.27352 N 14.56898 E
• Reka (sample note) - this place should be merged with Rijeka, as "Reka" is Slovene language toponym for the Croatian city of "Rijeka"
• Stara Baška (sample note) - 44.95371 N 14.68984 E
• Dolenje pri Jelšanah (sample note) - 45.5057 N 14.2670 E

Could you, please, add these dots as well?

This note seems to take its time to get a dot. It's about here.
+58° 6' 56.90", +25° 11' 57.04"

Having read somewhere that international airports get their own profile, I was disappointed to see that a bill with location Keflavik International Airport (entered with the correct diacritical sign of course) didn't get a dot. Who will come to the rescue?

Hi, if someone can check my comment here : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38691&start=300" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; it's about MOERBEKE (9500) and MOEREBEKE-WAAS (9180)

X

In light of some recent post I'd like to know what's the custom/policy for entering places that are quite remote from the EBT "city". It's apparently possible in cities divided into several post code areas, but what I'm interested in are mountain huts, tourist farms, castles, ski resorts, sometimes simply some houses away from the main village, also border crossings, toll stations, petrol stations in between places etc. It's not an issue of dots in Slovenia and it's perfectly clear to which "city" they belong as all the teritory is divided into "settlements", but e.g. the top 20 by area, after Ljubljana, measure 40-95 km2, covering vast sections of Alps or forests around/above a small village that receives a dot

So my question is if it's worth entering the exact location as the city (which would then be redirected), will it get its own coordinates in the system in this case (and correct distance in case of a hit)? Or shall I just enter the right city and all other info in the comments?