Page 206 of 343
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 5:48 pm
by eddydevries
Please merge the profile of
Veerle Laakdal into the profile of
Veerle. The user entering the notes as "Veerle Laakdal" used this to seperate them from (if existing) another Veerle. But it formed a new city-profile.
I'm also wondering: if you merge 2 profiles, are also coordinates added to the notes?
Because for example
this hitnote doesn't have coordinates.
If you have to add them, I suggest you use these coordinates:
51.069907 N , 4.986506 E (I don't know where this user exactly received his notes, but this is the centerpoint of the village).
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 6:16 pm
by LArdennais
Oh my God ! All coordinates for all villages, places... shoud be at the good place !
Yes, eddy...it's a great iceberg
I will try to replace all from the postal code (2430 = Laakdal, Eindhout, Vorst (Kempen) / 2431 = Veerle, Varendonk).
EDIT : done.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 9:04 pm
by groentje
About a month ago, I visited Vlassenbroek. Apparantly, I was the first to visit this touristic village... According to Wikipedia, it's on 51,048333 N, 4,130278 O. It's part of Dendermonde, in the section of Baasrode.
A note I entered in Vlassenbroek:
http://www.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=130127367" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:31 pm
by LArdennais
't is nu gedoen, groentje
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:00 am
by groentje
Tès da gaa vriedeg bedankt zaat, hein.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:03 pm
by LArdennais
Allei, zeg !
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:28 pm
by opalon
I see some hit from this city :
Ath and I see a wrong hit : the hit with
laurent050669
The mistake are here, the post code from Ath are 7800 and not 7801. But the poste code 7801 are from this city :
Irchonwelz
Many thanks for this changing
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:32 pm
by Ewri
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=131033247" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Can you please change dot of that note? It should be at the dot to its right. Its co ordinates are : 45.081N 7.7674E
Thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:54 pm
by -flop-
Actually coordinates were not right but the real ones are not so east located as you state.
The centre of the area covered by Turin 10132 is about 45.0703N, 7.738E.
Don't know if this smaller repositioning implies a change of dot as well.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:23 pm
by LArdennais
opalon wrote:I see some hit from this city :
Ath and I see a wrong hit : the hit with
laurent050669
The mistake are here, the post code from Ath are 7800 and not 7801. But the poste code 7801 are from this city :
Irchonwelz
Many thanks for this changing
For changing...
WHAT, opalon ?????????????????????
a) the postal code (7801
7800) ?
b) the city (Ath
Irchonwelz) ?
For me, this Hit would be placed to Irchonwelz (because of the postal code) - and I can do that
BUT if this Hit would be place to Ath, sorry but only the EBTer (laurent050669) can change himself the postal code.
No, Opalon, the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do
ALL ! Capisce ?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:46 pm
by romanm
Please add these two as well:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:17 pm
by MaxVR
LArdennais wrote: the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do ALL !
But maybe you can help me:
MaxVR wrote:Dear city-profile-moderators,
Last week I was on holiday in the beautiful Berner Oberland, Switzerland. I was very lucky to receive
this 
from a souvenir shop in Kleine Scheidegg and
these 
and from a souvenir shop at the Jungfraujoch! I was the first member of EBT to enter notes in these 2 places. Two days later, the notes were end up in the city profile of Lauterbrunnen (so the city profiles of Kleine Scheidegg and Jungfraujoch were merged with the city profile of Lauterbrunnen). This seems very wrong to me! Neither of them are even part of the municipality of Lauterbrunnen (postal code 3822).
Kleine Scheidegg has its own railway station, its own hotels, its own restaurants, its own shops, even its own postal code (3801).
The Jungfraujoch also has its own railway station, restaurants and shops and has the same postal code as Kleine Scheidegg, but actually there's no real link between them.
So I would like to separate the city profiles of Kleine Scheidegg (46°35′N 7°57′E) and Jungraujoch (46°32′N 7°58′E) from the city profile of Lauterbrunnen. Most likely would be if Kleine Scheidegg and Jungfraujoch both get their own city profile!
Thanks!
I asked for it almost one month ago.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:05 pm
by opalon
LArdennais wrote:opalon wrote:I see some hit from this city :
Ath and I see a wrong hit : the hit with
laurent050669
The mistake are here, the post code from Ath are 7800 and not 7801. But the poste code 7801 are from this city :
Irchonwelz
Many thanks for this changing
For changing...
WHAT, opalon ?????????????????????
a) the postal code (7801
7800) ?
b) the city (Ath
Irchonwelz) ?
For me, this Hit would be placed to Irchonwelz (because of the postal code) - and I can do that
BUT if this Hit would be place to Ath, sorry but only the EBTer (laurent050669) can change himself the postal code.
No, Opalon, the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do
ALL ! Capisce ?
You are right LArdennais. The hit would be placed to Irchonwelz and not to Ath. The postal code from Irchonwelz are 7801... that it
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:39 pm
by opalon
opalon wrote:LArdennais wrote:opalon wrote:I see some hit from this city :
Ath and I see a wrong hit : the hit with
laurent050669
The mistake are here, the post code from Ath are 7800 and not 7801. But the poste code 7801 are from this city :
Irchonwelz
Many thanks for this changing
For changing...
WHAT, opalon ?????????????????????
a) the postal code (7801
7800) ?
b) the city (Ath
Irchonwelz) ?
For me, this Hit would be placed to Irchonwelz (because of the postal code) - and I can do that
BUT if this Hit would be place to Ath, sorry but only the EBTer (laurent050669) can change himself the postal code.
No, Opalon, the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do
ALL ! Capisce ?
You are right LArdennais. The hit would be placed to Irchonwelz and not to Ath. The postal code from Irchonwelz are 7801... that it
At LArdennais... that the same :
but, the city are changing
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:24 pm
by LArdennais
MaxVR wrote:LArdennais wrote: the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do ALL !
But maybe you can help me:
MaxVR wrote:Dear city-profile-moderators,
Last week I was on holiday in the beautiful Berner Oberland, Switzerland. I was very lucky to receive
this from a souvenir shop in Kleine Scheidegg and
these and from a souvenir shop at the Jungfraujoch! I was the first member of EBT to enter notes in these 2 places. Two days later, the notes were end up in the city profile of Lauterbrunnen (so the city profiles of Kleine Scheidegg and Jungfraujoch were merged with the city profile of Lauterbrunnen). This seems very wrong to me! Neither of them are even part of the municipality of Lauterbrunnen (postal code 3822).
Kleine Scheidegg has its own railway station, its own hotels, its own restaurants, its own shops, even its own postal code (3801).
The Jungfraujoch also has its own railway station, restaurants and shops and has the same postal code as Kleine Scheidegg, but actually there's no real link between them.
So I would like to separate the city profiles of Kleine Scheidegg (46°35′N 7°57′E) and Jungraujoch (46°32′N 7°58′E) from the city profile of Lauterbrunnen. Most likely would be if Kleine Scheidegg and Jungfraujoch both get their own city profile!
Thanks!
I asked for it almost one month ago.
It's a little bit more "amazing"...
Kleine Scheidegg = CH-3823, Kanton Bern - region Interlaken-Oberhasli - depends on Grindelwald - 46.58426 N / 7.96193 E;
Jungfraujoch = CH-3801, Canton du Valais - region of Bezirk Goms - depends on Fieschertal - 46.54745 N / 7.98208 E.
As I am City Manager only for
, I can't do the splitting operations
(Who deals with CH, please ?????????????)
opalon wrote:LArdennais wrote:opalon wrote:I see some hit from this city :
Ath and I see a wrong hit : the hit with
laurent050669
The mistake are here, the post code from Ath are 7800 and not 7801. But the poste code 7801 are from this city :
Irchonwelz
Many thanks for this changing
For changing...
WHAT, opalon ?????????????????????
a) the postal code (7801
7800) ?
b) the city (Ath
Irchonwelz) ?
For me, this Hit would be placed to Irchonwelz (because of the postal code) - and I can do that
BUT if this Hit would be place to Ath, sorry but only the EBTer (laurent050669) can change himself the postal code.
No, Opalon, the City Managers can do some things...be we aren't able to do
ALL ! Capisce ?
You are right LArdennais. The hit would be placed to Irchonwelz and not to Ath. The postal code from Irchonwelz are 7801... that it
OK, it's done - so, next time, here or in another thread, BE FIRST PRECISE in your comments, so we can gain time !
And for Casteau...I have done this ! Capisce ?