Page 252 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:38 pm
by Burdie
erasmuston wrote:According to this map http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/map/usern ... ;maptype=0, bills entered at Paviljoen the Walvis in West-Terschelling, the Netherlands (8881AB) such as this one http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=157963174 should be in the dot that also contains the island of Vlieland and the north-east part of Texel
Entered coordinates 53.35696, 5.21131 for postal code 8881AB and 8881 AB

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 11:53 pm
by erasmuston
Burdie wrote:
erasmuston wrote:According to this map http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/map/usern ... ;maptype=0, bills entered at Paviljoen the Walvis in West-Terschelling, the Netherlands (8881AB) such as this one http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=157963174 should be in the dot that also contains the island of Vlieland and the north-east part of Texel
Entered coordinates 53.35696, 5.21131 for postal code 8881AB and 8881 AB
thanx

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:51 am
by an-148
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=118077144

please locate the bill on Nádasd (coordinates 46.987147,16.618685) and not under Nádasdladány .

thank you

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:38 am
by lmviterbo
an-148 wrote:please locate the bill on Nádasd (coordinates 46.987147,16.618685) and not under Nádasdladány.
Done.

In the process I eliminated Nádasdladány, sorry for any inconvenience.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:39 am
by an-148
lmviterbo wrote:
an-148 wrote:please locate the bill on Nádasd (coordinates 46.987147,16.618685) and not under Nádasdladány.
Done.

In the process I eliminated Nádasdladány, sorry for any inconvenience.

muito obrigado ;-)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:24 pm
by vermeer

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 12:13 am
by lmviterbo
139 notes already. Done.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:20 pm
by Jan010

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 2:27 pm
by tigerpranke

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:18 pm
by Jan010
tigerpranke wrote:
Jan010 wrote:Klarenbeek pls merge with Klarenbeek (Apeldoorn)
I merged Klarenbeek with Klarenbeek (Voorst) :arrow: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klarenbeek (dorp)

This villages belongs to two municipality: Apeldoorn and Voorst

The notes I got are from Klarenbeek in the municipality Apeldoorn.
Pls add my notes to Klarenbeek (Apeldoorn).

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:13 pm
by tigerpranke
Jan010 wrote:
tigerpranke wrote:
Jan010 wrote:Klarenbeek pls merge with Klarenbeek (Apeldoorn)
I merged Klarenbeek with Klarenbeek (Voorst) :arrow: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klarenbeek (dorp)

This villages belongs to two municipality: Apeldoorn and Voorst

The notes I got are from Klarenbeek in the municipality Apeldoorn.
Pls add my notes to Klarenbeek (Apeldoorn).
Sorry, but I don't know which notes of Klarenbeek are yours. You should provide a link to one note, that is easier for citymanagers.

I guess as you entered 30 notes in Klarenbeek, most of your notes are with the postal code 7382 CB. Your hit with Klarenbeek was at Rabobank, Sparrenweg 5. I searched through the :flag-nl: postal codes to get the right municipality, which seems to be Voorst for 7382 CB. Am I wrong?

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 4:47 pm
by Nick6502
Sars-la-Bruyère has no dot yet.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=158573134

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:21 pm
by LArdennais
Nick6502 wrote:Sars-la-Bruyère has no dot yet.
http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=158573134
Done, and also done for all "Cities" included into "Municipality" of Frameries.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 11:33 am
by opalon
https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=158713220 could you please merge with this city : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=172041

this is the same post code :) 10540

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2015 1:18 pm
by lmviterbo
Done.

I have also merged this "Samut Prakan" into https://eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=172041

I understand that the airport visitors who chose "Samut Prakan" as the city name (Nam Som, Jawos, Luumi, Yok's, AKVS, TurboTim, Ate, and the inactive shugal) are not wrong, but also not following the majority nor the pervasive idea that international airports should have their own city profiles on EBT.