Page 254 of 343

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:11 pm
by negative

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:16 am
by lmviterbo
negative wrote::flag-lt: Aviežieniai (wrong) http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=217515
to be merged with :flag-lt: Avižieniai (correct) http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=217514
Merged, plotted and enregioned. :)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:48 pm
by opalon
could you please created :

São Lourenço (Brazil) : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=159249520

Latitude : -22.12517
Longitude : -45.05131890000001

Criciúma (Brazil) : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=159212299

Latitude : -28.6727702
Longitude : -49.37337709999997

Campinas (Bazil) : https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=159192255 & https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=159255230 (the same post code : 04007001)

Latitude : -22.9099384
Longitude : -47.06263319999999

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:17 am
by lmviterbo
São Lourenço (MG), Criciúma (SC) and Campinas (SP) added and assigned to their states.

However, I did not locate Campinas (04007001) not only because the postal code is not in the right form (should be 04007-001) but essentially because this is not a postal code in Campinas. Instead, this postal code belongs to a street in the city of São Paulo itself, capital of the state and 100 km far from Campinas.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2015 8:46 pm
by Vunono
Could anybody add the city of Image Fnideq? Coordinates: 35.848415, -5.353978. Thanks!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:28 am
by Vunono
Vunono wrote:Could anybody add the city of Image Fnideq? Coordinates: 35.848415, -5.353978. Thanks!
Someone from the Spanish forum already added the coordinates and dot, but the province (Mdiq-Fnideq) and the region (Tanger-Tetouan-Alhoceima) are still missing. This year they made a territorial reform in Morocco and changed most regions, so I'm afraid that the EBT database is now outdated and needs to be changed...

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:50 pm
by groentje
I was in Whitby, last week, and to my surprise, it wasn't yet in the database. I've entered e.g. this note. According to Wikipedia, it's on 54.4858 N, 0.6206 W, in county North Yorkshire.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:44 am
by Burdie
groentje wrote:I was in Whitby, last week, and to my surprise, it wasn't yet in the database. I've entered e.g. this note. According to Wikipedia, it's on 54.4858 N, 0.6206 W, in county North Yorkshire.

The dot is there :-)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 8:37 pm
by Crazy Bob
this hit appears to be with Grenada in Spain, not with Nicaragua (although the post code used by the second user is one in Rotterdam :flag-nl: )

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 9:00 pm
by Burdie
Crazy Bob wrote:this hit appears to be with Grenada in Spain, not with Nicaragua (although the post code used by the second user is one in Rotterdam :flag-nl: )
Is changed to Granada Spain. Hit iso 8974 KM to ????? Sorry still in the catch

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 7:28 am
by negative

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:33 am
by Burdie
negative wrote: :flag-lt: Strsčiūnai (wrong) http://lt.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=217803
to be changed to Stračiūnai https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stra%C4%8Di%C5%ABnai
My Lituanianis very rusty, but I hope the dot is now on the right spot and in the right district :-)

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:49 pm
by Evert
Lohja as should be merged with Lohja

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:25 pm
by lmviterbo
Evert wrote:Lohja as should be merged with Lohja
Done, thank you.

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:02 pm
by Nick6502
!New dot!

Bertrée, part of the city of Hannut, province of Liège, Belgium.

http://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=160051120