Page 267 of 339
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 9:37 pm
by eddydevries
Please merge the city
De Pinte. into the city profile of
De Pinte.
To enter the cities this way you can be sure to be the number-1-user

.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 12:01 am
by Burdie
eddydevries wrote:Please merge the city
De Pinte. into the city profile of
De Pinte.
To enter the cities this way you can be sure to be the number-1-user

.
Done, Thanks for that
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:09 am
by eddydevries
Burdie wrote:eddydevries wrote:Please merge the city
De Pinte. into the city profile of
De Pinte.
To enter the cities this way you can be sure to be the number-1-user

.
Done, Thanks for that
Thank you.
And here I've got some more work for you

:
I'll leave it for now

. I think these are all the "non-existing" cities in the province of West-Vlaanderen.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 11:15 am
by googlejaps
eddydevries wrote:
/Long list of places/
Done

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 11:49 am
by eddydevries
googlejaps wrote:eddydevries wrote:
/Long list of places/
Done

Thank you

.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:38 pm
by de*lerger
Kilmore (county Wexford) is merged with the profile of another Kilmore.
Just added WX in the postalcode field, the coordinates are: 52.2049, -006.5485
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:50 pm
by Raumi
de*lerger wrote:Kilmore (county Wexford) is merged with the profile of another Kilmore.
Just added WX in the postalcode field, the coordinates are: 52.2049, -006.5485
Done!

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:41 am
by de*lerger
Raumi wrote:de*lerger wrote:Kilmore (county Wexford) is merged with the profile of another Kilmore.
Just added WX in the postalcode field, the coordinates are: 52.2049, -006.5485
Done!

Thanks

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:24 pm
by de*lerger
Ballyfrawley is new on EBT.
Coordinates: 52.4752, -009.0169
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 9:35 pm
by tigerpranke
de*lerger wrote:Ballyfrawley is new on EBT.
Coordinates: 52.4752, -009.0169
Done
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:39 pm
by Burdie
de*lerger wrote:Ballyfrawley is new on EBT.
Coordinates: 52.4752, -009.0169
I'll keep an Eye on You

Please give me et least 24 hours (The guidelines on the first post says 48 Hours) the time to put everything in place
Ik hou je in de gaten

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 1:42 am
by eddydevries
I was looking for cities which I haven't visited yet. Than I noticed the "city" Limburg.
It made me think "I want to go there", because it's a special name (it's also the name of a Belgian province).
But when I saw the
hit entered here the user used the postcode of the municipality Heusden-Zolder in the province Limburg.
So I suppose she should use a village in that municipality. Because we can't see in which village she got the note and there's a profile for the whole municipality I suggest the notes with "Limburg 3550" move to the profile of
Heusden-Zolder.
I don't know which postcode is used for the second note entered as "Limburg", maybe he really got it from
here, but maybe it's also a mistake.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 6:32 pm
by Burdie
eddydevries wrote:I was looking for cities which I haven't visited yet. Than I noticed the "city" Limburg.
It made me think "I want to go there", because it's a special name (it's also the name of a Belgian province).
But when I saw the
hit entered here the user used the postcode of the municipality Heusden-Zolder in the province Limburg.
So I suppose she should use a village in that municipality. Because we can't see in which village she got the note and there's a profile for the whole municipality I suggest the notes with "Limburg 3550" move to the profile of
Heusden-Zolder.
I don't know which postcode is used for the second note entered as "Limburg", maybe he really got it from
here, but maybe it's also a mistake.
I saw that there where no coordinates entered for 'Limburg' but it was linked to 'Tielt' West-Vlaanderen. I don't know if the system made the connection or someone else. We can't leave it like this.
The other note is entered with the postcode 8700 and indeed Tielt has also the same Postcode.
I was trying to look for the place 'Limburg' on the Map, but I couldn't find any.
For the monent I leave it like it is. I leave it for the Belgium expert.
If it stays long like it is than I transfer 8700 to Tielt and 3550 to Heusden-Zolder
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:11 pm
by LArdennais
Because the postal code used first was 3550, this "Limburg" profile goes now to Heusden-Zolder.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 2:30 am
by groentje
Thanks to the plotter who put Støren on the map, my effort to get of the train, walk half an hour to town, wait for the banks to open at 10, change some money and return the 2-3 km to the station, paid off.
Which brings me to the following question: How should Norway be devided? For me, it's perfectly fine as it is, but some might argue smaller locations should be regrouped under the municipality, which in this case is Midtre Gauldal. In brief, should Norway be devided as Belgium or the Netherlands, or like Germany?