Page 271 of 342
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:34 am
by Burdie
All done. I also found a few other

profiles without a dot. Thanks for that
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:14 am
by negative
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 2:40 pm
by Burdie
All Sorted and I found also 3 more

cityprifiles without a dot

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:51 pm
by Fons
When viewing the city profile of
Naples there's something wrong with the small map right above. Wrong part of the world and obviously no dot to be find.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 1:16 am
by Burdie
Fons wrote:When viewing the city profile of
Naples there's something wrong with the small map right above. Wrong part of the world and obviously no dot to be find.
I found a coordinate from napels without a digital point 40xxx iso 40.xxx and showed a dot somewhere in de artic ocean. map shown is still not correct, but I think it is in the catch. I hope after tomorrow it is showing correct
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:43 pm
by groentje
I was away, last 2 weeks, and got notes in some new and semi-new places.
Hronská Dúbrava is an apparant newcomer. According to Wikipedia, it's at 48.583333 N, 19 E, belonging to the Banskobystrický Region, and the Žiar nad Hronom District.
Tiszacsernyő is the Hungarian name for
Čierna nad Tisou, so they can be merged. According to Wikipedia, 60% of the population is Hungarian, which is why I chose to use the Hungarian name.
Shegyni is just a different translitteration for
Shehyni, I used it because it was proposed by the Ukrainian postal service. They can be merged.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 8:08 pm
by Burdie
groentje wrote:I was away, last 2 weeks, and got notes in some new and semi-new places.
Hronská Dúbrava is an apparant newcomer. According to Wikipedia, it's at 48.583333 N, 19 E, belonging to the Banskobystrický Region, and the Žiar nad Hronom District.
Tiszacsernyő is the Hungarian name for
Čierna nad Tisou, so they can be merged. According to Wikipedia, 60% of the population is Hungarian, which is why I chose to use the Hungarian name.
Shegyni is just a different translitteration for
Shehyni, I used it because it was proposed by the Ukrainian postal service. They can be merged.
All done, thanks
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:19 pm
by vermeer
Klein Genhout (Kelmond was also possible; had to make a choice)
https://nl.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=171200171
50.921518, 5.807994
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:53 pm
by Burdie
Ik heb me laten leiden door
wiki en daar EBT al een city profiel had van Genhout waar ook al Groot Genhout was geplaats. Vandaar dat hij ook daaronder is geplaatst. De Coordinaten zijn wel van Klein Genhout
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:47 pm
by siriusLT
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:18 pm
by Raumi
siriusLT wrote: 
Rusne should be

Rusnė with coordinates 55°17′49″N 21°22′41″E
Done! Thanks for spotting!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:55 am
by negative
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 11:29 am
by LArdennais
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 12:49 am
by Elmo
I just found out that somebody mistakenly put
Marigot (Guadeloupe) together with Marigot (Saint-Martin), but obviously they are not the same. The coordinates are
16.0856504, -61.7729044.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:00 am
by tigerpranke