Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

lmviterbo · Post by **lmviterbo** » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:43 pm

an-148 wrote:https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=182134108

this note has been received on the dot south of main dot Funchal

Well done!

Location fixed, you should have the dot now.

an-148 · Post by **an-148** » Fri Dec 22, 2017 7:09 pm

lmviterbo wrote:
an-148 wrote:https://fr.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=182134108

this note has been received on the dot south of main dot Funchal
Well done!

Location fixed, you should have the dot now.

obrigado

Dioniz · Post by **Dioniz** » Wed Jan 10, 2018 1:23 am

Please, move 3 notes of

Bukovec (73985) from

Bukovec (mun. Slovenska Bistrica) to its proper country. New city profile should belong to

Frýdek-Místek district on the eastern most territory of CZ.

Burdie · Post by **Burdie** » Wed Jan 10, 2018 2:53 am

Dioniz wrote:Please, move 3 notes of Bukovec (73985) from Bukovec (mun. Slovenska Bistrica) to its proper country. New city profile should belong to Frýdek-Místek district on the eastern most territory of CZ.

It's done. Thanks for spotting this

the_pooh_tripper · Post by **the_pooh_tripper** » Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:10 pm

The village of Verduz doesn't exist, the correct name is Vaduz.

the_pooh_tripper · Post by **the_pooh_tripper** » Wed Jan 10, 2018 10:39 pm

Burdie · Post by **Burdie** » Thu Jan 11, 2018 2:48 am

the_pooh_tripper wrote:The village of Verduz doesn't exist, the correct name is Vaduz.

Verduz is now merged with Vaduz

People who entering the wrong flags by the note can only change the flag by correcting there entered note.
Sorry to say that, but there are much more wrong flags in the system.
By correcting and placing them by the right city profile makes it that it is counted for that city profile / country

groentje · Post by **groentje** » Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:10 am

My notes from Bangor NI (http://www.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=183012206) ended up in the wrong Bangor. Should be http://www.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=194768

groentje · Post by **groentje** » Mon Jan 22, 2018 6:14 pm

groentje wrote:My notes from Bangor NI (http://www.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=183012206) ended up in the wrong Bangor. Should be http://www.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=194768

Thanks.

Burdie · Post by **Burdie** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:37 am

groentje wrote:
groentje wrote:My notes from Bangor NI (http://www.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=183012206) ended up in the wrong Bangor. Should be http://www.eurobilltracker.com/profile/?city=194768
Thanks.

And now I read your post. You see EBT is working

Steda · Post by **Steda** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 9:57 pm

I have a hit with Brielles

. But no red point in France.
Can you change this?

Thanks !

lmviterbo · Post by **lmviterbo** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:13 pm

Steda wrote:Brielles

Done, thanks.

(Placed under département "35 Ille-et-Vilaine", and assigned coords 48.0085,-1.0896.)

eddydevries · Post by **eddydevries** » Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:23 pm

I just entered this note, which I received in Kaltenbach (near Dorsten

).
But it was plotted in Austria.

Please move it to N 51.754096, E 6.957851

lmviterbo · Post by **lmviterbo** » Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:44 pm

eddydevries wrote:Kaltenbach (near Dorsten ) […] Please move it

Done. Thanks.

tigerpranke · Post by **tigerpranke** » Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:39 pm

lmviterbo wrote:
eddydevries wrote:Kaltenbach (near Dorsten ) […] Please move it
Done. Thanks.

@eddydevries:
Please wait at least 48 hours before asking for correction. Normally I take a look at new

places every 1 or 2 days.

@lmviterbo:
You forgot to merge Kaltenbach with the profile of Dorsten, which is the community (

Gemeinde). This is standard for german places.

Now it's done

EuroBillTracker

Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles

Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles