Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Moderators: Fons, avij, Phaseolus, dserrano5
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I don´t say that I´ve got the solution.
In the Netherlands, the names of the towns, cities are not changing if they go to an other Municipalities. addresses and postcodes are also staying the same. People are entering in on the name of the town, city where they found the notes. EBT has a level for Municipalities for the Netherlands.
If the town/city is moving to an other Municipality, the one person has only to move the town/city to the other Municipality
BTW: I think I found Seutukunta 71 in EBT South Eastern Pirkanmaa / Kaakkois-Pirkanmaa
In the Netherlands, the names of the towns, cities are not changing if they go to an other Municipalities. addresses and postcodes are also staying the same. People are entering in on the name of the town, city where they found the notes. EBT has a level for Municipalities for the Netherlands.
If the town/city is moving to an other Municipality, the one person has only to move the town/city to the other Municipality
BTW: I think I found Seutukunta 71 in EBT South Eastern Pirkanmaa / Kaakkois-Pirkanmaa
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple
3
407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Hello,
Please add coordinates:
Kantališkiai, Marijampolė county,
54.636, 23.433
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187147722
and
Aristava, Kaunas county,
55.292, 24.089
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187147555
Thanks!
Please add coordinates:
Kantališkiai, Marijampolė county,
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187147722
and
Aristava, Kaunas county,
https://en.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187147555
Thanks!
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
still missing the dotnegative wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:13 pm missing dots for:
Wroclaw![]()
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025532
51.121365, 17.015632
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I see a Dot ¿?negative wrote: ↑Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:41 pmstill missing the dotnegative wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:13 pm missing dots for:
Wroclaw![]()
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025532
51.121365, 17.015632
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple
3
407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7230
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Yesterday, I came here, tried to solve the missing dot but realized that Wroclaw 53-633 already had coordinates. I assumed that someone else had done it just before me. I actually checked the coordinates on the map and it seemed about right, but I didn't bother double-checking it.
It turns out that those coordinates were probably assigned some time ago, and they were indeed a little bit off, enough to place this location on the wrong dot to the West. That is why we *saw* the dot—the wrong dot in fact, but we didn't realize it.
I reassigned coordinates, so it should be fixed now.
Actually, I didn't assign the exact coordinates provided by negative. Instead, I checked at PostCodeDatabase, mapped all 5 streets referred as belonging to 53-633, and guesstimated the center of this area. These are the coords I finally used: 51.124, 17.014.
It turns out that those coordinates were probably assigned some time ago, and they were indeed a little bit off, enough to place this location on the wrong dot to the West. That is why we *saw* the dot—the wrong dot in fact, but we didn't realize it.
I reassigned coordinates, so it should be fixed now.
Actually, I didn't assign the exact coordinates provided by negative. Instead, I checked at PostCodeDatabase, mapped all 5 streets referred as belonging to 53-633, and guesstimated the center of this area. These are the coords I finally used: 51.124, 17.014.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
hi again,
looks like confusion
Now one of the new dots has dissapeared, and second has appeared.
But just to clarify:
I have asked to add 2 (two) dots:
Wroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025532
51.121365, 17.015632
Wroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025520
51.122106, 16.989711
looks like confusion
I have asked to add 2 (two) dots:
Wroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025532
51.121365, 17.015632
Wroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025520
51.122106, 16.989711
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7230
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Hmmm… Which Kaufland have you visited? If I got it right, the coords you're giving are for Kaufland Legniczka, which is 54-204, not 52-204 (although it probably says so in receipts).negative wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:49 pmWroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025520
51.122106, 16.989711
According to both Google Maps—which has been increasingly more accurate with postal codes—and PostCodeDatabase, 54-204 is on that "empty" dot you show (where Popowice station lies); 52-204, on the other hand, is on the Southern outskirts of Wrocław, on Obrońców Poczty Gdańskiej.
So it seems that you have to change your entry to 54-204.
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Please merge entry https://si.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187069072 with
Szentgotthárd 9970. Thanks!
My profile & EBTST & Hit-dots map
Hits: 616x
, 277x
, 52x
, 24x
, 10x
, 7x
, 5x
, 5x
, 3x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x ME, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
, 1x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Hits: 616x
Flightdiary & Where's George?
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done, ThanksDioniz wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:51 pm Please merge entry https://si.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187069072 withSzentgotthárd 9970. Thanks!
Personal statistics from: NIGMM / EBTST / EBTcheck 259 Hits with 2 triple
3
407
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
list of (known by me) latest "codes_country.txt" files Blog
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Hello,
Please add coordinates:
Salamiestis, Panevėžys county,
55.942, 24.878
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187245031
Thanks!
Please add coordinates:
Salamiestis, Panevėžys county,
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187245031
Thanks!
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7230
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Done, thanks.siriusLT wrote: ↑Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:17 pmSalamiestis, Panevėžys county,55.942, 24.878
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187245031
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
I changed it to 54-204 and it was ok for couple of days, but now I see it has disappeared againlmviterbo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:27 pmHmmm… Which Kaufland have you visited? If I got it right, the coords you're giving are for Kaufland Legniczka, which is 54-204, not 52-204 (although it probably says so in receipts).negative wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:49 pmWroclaw
https://lt.eurobilltracker.com/notes/?id=187025520
51.122106, 16.989711
According to both Google Maps—which has been increasingly more accurate with postal codes—and PostCodeDatabase, 54-204 is on that "empty" dot you show (where Popowice station lies); 52-204, on the other hand, is on the Southern outskirts of Wrocław, on Obrońców Poczty Gdańskiej.
So it seems that you have to change your entry to 54-204.
- lmviterbo
- Euro-Master

- Posts: 7230
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:23 pm
- Location: Lisboa, Portugal
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect dots and inaccuracies among city profiles
Seems like either I made a mistake at the time (and I have no idea why it was shown correctly), or someone moved the grid just a tiny little bit further north…
Here it goes again. I believe it's solved now. Well… for now, a least.


